https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70977
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67485
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67482
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67483
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67486
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66940
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
--- Comment #25 from Andreas Schwab ---
FAIL: gfortran.dg/dec_union_4.f90 -O0 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/dec_union_4.f90 -O1 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/dec_union_4.f90 -O2 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/dec_union_4.f90 -O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71006
Bug ID: 71006
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: type
mismatch in conditional expression) w/ -O1
-ftree-loop-vectorize
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68717
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> As discussed in the other related PR, those are real issues - Fortran
> fronetnd should not declare one function with multiple and incompatible
> declarations.
The other related PR is pr68649.
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67498
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Dominique
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71007
Bug ID: 71007
Summary: Divergence between treatment of char[0] between OR (=>
SFINAE failure) and diagnostic printing (no failure)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71007
--- Comment #1 from Johannes Schaub ---
Sorry, forgot to actually add the code of the reduced testcase:
template
void f(char(&)[N])
{ }
int main() {
char x[1];
f(x);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60290
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Sun May 8 11:42:49 2016
New Revision: 236005
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236005&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Compile libcilkrts with -funwind-tables (PR target/60290)
Backport fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60290
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Sun May 8 11:45:03 2016
New Revision: 236006
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236006&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Compile libcilkrts with -funwind-tables (PR target/60290)
Backport fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69582
Bug 69582 depends on bug 60290, which changed state.
Bug 60290 Summary: 32-bit g++.dg/cilk-plus/CK/catch_exc.cc FAILs on Solaris/x86
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60290
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60290
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71008
Bug ID: 71008
Summary: [7 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vprord-1.c
scan-assembler-times vprord
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71008
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71008
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> It is rotatert vs rotate. How did this happen?
There is:
/* Convert ROTATERT to ROTATE. */
if (code == ROTATERT)
{
unsigned int bitsize =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67482
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I cannot reproduce the runtime error with my instrumented trunk (7.0).
nor with instrumented 6.1.1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
--- Comment #26 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 10:09:02AM +, sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
>
> --- Comment #25 from Andreas Schwab ---
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/dec_union_4.f90 -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
--- Comment #27 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> WORKFORME on i686-*-freebsd and x86_64-*-freebsd.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-05/msg00779.html for
m68k-unknown-linux-gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67482
--- Comment #3 from Vittorio Zecca ---
I confirm I cannot reproduce it on 6.1.0 nor 7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71009
Bug ID: 71009
Summary: g++: ICE on modified gdb/valarith.c with -Ofast
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71009
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager ---
Created attachment 38442
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38442&action=edit
bzipped preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67482
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I confirm I cannot reproduce it on 6.1.0 nor 7
Closing as FIXED?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67482
--- Comment #5 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Running the sanitized version of gcc against the testsuite I got no
runtime error in dwarf2out.c
So I believe this issue can be closed as FIXED.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
--- Comment #28 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 03:06:39PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
>
> --- Comment #27 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > WORKFORME on i686-*-freeb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71010
Bug ID: 71010
Summary: error: 'begin' was not declared in this scope
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70998
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun May 8 18:18:42 2016
New Revision: 236011
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236011&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/70998
* config/i386/sse.md (*sse2_vd_cvt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70873
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70998
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71011
Pranith Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bobby.prani at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71011
Bug ID: 71011
Summary: Wrong "may be uninitialized" warning
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71011
--- Comment #2 from Pranith Kumar ---
Created attachment 38444
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38444&action=edit
pre-procssed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71011
--- Comment #3 from Pranith Kumar ---
Command which shows this error:
$ g++ -o .opt_build/src/allocate.o -c -O3 -std=c++11 -funroll-loops -Werror
-Wuninitialized -Wno-write-strings -DLONG_COUNTERS -DNO_MPI -DNO_DEBUG
src/allocate.i -Wall -Wextra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71011
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71012
Bug ID: 71012
Summary: ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:9348 when
compiling stress-ng
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
URL: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71013
Bug ID: 71013
Summary: [7 Regression] c-common.c:12810:37: error: 'LLONG_MAX'
was not declared in this scope
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30527
David changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gccbugzilla@limegreensocks.
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39440
--- Comment #5 from David ---
This is a duplicate of 30527.
A subset of the most commonly needed/used modifiers have been added to the docs
as of 5.x (including the %c0 referenced above). For this reason, I recommend
this bug be closed.
If the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43319
David changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gccbugzilla@limegreensocks.
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71014
Bug ID: 71014
Summary: associate statement inside omp parallel do appears to
disable default private attribute for inner loop
indices
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69523
--- Comment #5 from Eric Fiselier ---
Would it be possible to add a -Wno-literal-suffix flag? I really want to use
warning with GCC, but I need to disable this one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70987
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70986
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71015
Bug ID: 71015
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in inline_small_functions, at
ipa-inline.c:1881
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
47 matches
Mail list logo
