https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70956
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Sat May 7 07:02:36 2016
New Revision: 235995
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235995&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
backport "Handle NULL def in build_cross_bb_scalars_def"
2016-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70992
Bug ID: 70992
Summary: Infinite recursion between fold_build2_stat_loc and
fold_binary_loc w/ -fwrapv
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70956
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70989
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo ---
Another case from bzlib.c:
.L820:
bt .L823
mov.l r0,@r7
.L823:
tst r11,r11
bt/s.L824 <<< convert to zero-displacement cbranch
mov #0,r1 <<< mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70937
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The patch in comment 13 fixes the regression without creating new one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70977
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
markus@x4 tmp % cat Acceptor-c++14.ii
namespace __gnu_cxx {
namespace __ops {
struct _Iter_less_iter {
template
constexpr int operator()(_Iterator1, _Iterator2 __it2) {
return *__it2;
}
};
co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70993
Bug ID: 70993
Summary: ICE with gcov and lto
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70994
Bug ID: 70994
Summary: gfortran: -fcheck=all implied do loop confusing
messages
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70853
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70995
Bug ID: 70995
Summary: [SH] rotcl usage results in bloaty code
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70994
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70996
Bug ID: 70996
Summary: deadlock on compilation sequence of operator<<
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70996
--- Comment #1 from Alexander ---
Created attachment 38435
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38435&action=edit
actually only this src leads inifinite compilation. src before finished with
error after 5 minutes
actually only th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70996
--- Comment #2 from Alexander ---
std-98 is not affect to result
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70997
Bug ID: 70997
Summary: [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on s390x-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70996
Alexander changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|infinite compilation of |regression - infinite
|seq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66328
physiker at toast2 dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||physiker at toast2 dot net
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70998
Bug ID: 70998
Summary: [7 Regression]: ICE in pre_and_rev_post_order_compute,
at cfganal.c
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70998
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70999
Bug ID: 70999
Summary: String incorrectly placed in flash instead of RAM when
building with -ffunction-sections
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70998
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70998
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
sse2_cvtsd2ss pattern is wrong.
This pattern is written as:
(define_insn "sse2_cvtsd2ss"
[(set (match_operand:V4SF 0 "register_operand" "=x,x,v")
(vec_merge:V4SF
(vec_duplicate:V4SF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70998
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66328
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71000
Bug ID: 71000
Summary: Wrong defines for ATMEGA328p
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70985
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70985
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
BIT_FIELD_REF allows non-is_gimple_val first operand, but when it is
transformed into a cast, obviously it needs to be forced into gimple val first.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70991
--- Comment #2 from bennet brauer ---
By the way, this bug mentions classes specifically, because the same idea but
with a simple "int" assignment generates a warning:
error: ‘foo’ is used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized]
i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71001
Bug ID: 71001
Summary: cross build native: fixincludes searches host path on
build system
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71002
Bug ID: 71002
Summary: [6 Regression] -fstrict-aliasing breaks Boost's short
string optimization implementation
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
--- Comment #20 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat May 7 23:16:23 2016
New Revision: 235999
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235999&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-05-07 Fritz Reese
PR fortran/56226
* m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
--- Comment #21 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 38439
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38439&action=edit
fortran/ChangeLog diff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
--- Comment #22 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 38440
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38440&action=edit
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog diff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
--- Comment #23 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 38441
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38441&action=edit
diff for revision 235999
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58601
Bug 58601 depends on bug 34747, which changed state.
Bug 34747 Summary: __attribute__((aligned(x)))+__alignof != correct behaviour
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34747
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10179
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andry at inbox dot ru
--- Comment #7 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34747
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71003
Bug ID: 71003
Summary: __extension__ silences pedwarn for "\e" in C but not
in C++
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71004
Bug ID: 71004
Summary: recursive_directory_iterator does not have a
user-provided default ctor
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71004
--- Comment #1 from Eric Fiselier ---
Additionally this seems to be affecting the value returned from
"recursion_pending()". The following code compiles and runs without asserting
on my machine.
#include
#include
using namespace std::experime
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71005
Bug ID: 71005
Summary: recursive_directory_iterator::operator++(int)
incorrectly implemented
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70963
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
44 matches
Mail list logo
