[Bug tree-optimization/70740] [7 Regression] ICE when compiling the Linux kernel (net/wireless/util.o)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70740 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/70740] [7 Regression] ICE when compiling the Linux kernel (net/wireless/util.o)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70740 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Apr 22 06:59:32 2016 New Revision: 235359 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235359&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-04-22 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/70740

[Bug ipa/70760] New: [6 regression] wrong generated code for std::make_unique with -fipa-pta

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70760 Bug ID: 70760 Summary: [6 regression] wrong generated code for std::make_unique with -fipa-pta Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/68331] [meta-bug] fipa-pta issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68331 --- Comment #13 from David Abdurachmanov --- Done, See: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70760

[Bug c++/67650] undef reference with -fdevirtualize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67650 Jonathan Briggs changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zlynx at acm dot org --- Comment #12 f

[Bug ipa/70760] [6/7 regression] wrong generated code for std::make_unique with -fipa-pta

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70760 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug ipa/70760] [6/7 regression] wrong generated code for std::make_unique with -fipa-pta

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70760 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/70754] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE during predictive commoning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70754 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.4 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/70725] Internal compiler error (ICE) on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70725 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/70624] [6/7 Regression] Several hundred asan failures with 6.0 on x86_64-apple-darwin10.8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70624 --- Comment #12 from Maxim Ostapenko --- Should be fixed on trunk and gcc-6-branch. Older branches don't need the patch, because they don't contain 'dyldVersionNumber' in libsanitizer.

[Bug sanitizer/70624] [6/7 Regression] Several hundred asan failures with 6.0 on x86_64-apple-darwin10.8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70624 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70761] New: C++ ICE on ppc64le and ppc64 with -m64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70761 Bug ID: 70761 Summary: C++ ICE on ppc64le and ppc64 with -m64 Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Prior

[Bug libstdc++/70762] New: FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/copy.cc execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin1*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70762 Bug ID: 70762 Summary: FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/copy.cc execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin1* Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug c++/70744] preincrements possibly double-evaluated in GNU ternaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70744 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- You're right. Of course - in C++, ++i and --i are considered lvalues, while i++ and i-- are not.

[Bug sanitizer/70712] False positive from AddressSanitizer with use of 'alignas'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70712 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/67650] undef reference with -fdevirtualize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67650 --- Comment #13 from Vincent --- Indeed, that sounds like the same bug. It took me an entire afternoon shrinking my case down to the code provided in attachment, it was a needle in a huge haystack. I haven't been able to reduce the code further.

[Bug preprocessor/16358] -Wno-system-headers hides warning caused by user header vs system header conflict

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16358 niva at niisi dot msk.ru changed: What|Removed |Added CC||niva at niisi dot msk.ru --- C

[Bug libfortran/70684] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] incorrect reading of values from file on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70684 --- Comment #14 from Andy May --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #13) > (In reply to Andy May from comment #12) > > I don't know that it's necessary or desired to support both '\n' and '\r' as > > eol, but instead the native eol just nee

[Bug libstdc++/70762] FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/copy.cc execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin1*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70762 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- There's no way I can debug that, someone with an OS X system will have to step through the code. The alternative, which is quite tempting, is to just disable the filesystem TS on darwin ;)

[Bug ada/70759] Ada rts fails to build with -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70759 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Look like Pmode vs. ptr_mode mixup, probably due to internal_reference_types. unit size align 32 symtab -1246558336 alias set 10 canonical type 0x3ffb5a548d 8 fields context Ada

[Bug sanitizer/70712] False positive from AddressSanitizer with use of 'alignas'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70712 Maxim Ostapenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m.ostapenko at samsung dot com --- Com

[Bug c++/70714] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70714 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/70691] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault with lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70691 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

gcc gives inccorect value for simple expression

The following code, when compiled with gcc, it outputs "7". I have tried it with gcc-4.8.3 and gcc-6.0.1-20160415, both on x86_64 linux, with options -O0, -g, -O2. All of them gave the same answer. When compiled with clang, it gives 6. I know that it is an ill coded program, but I still can't u

Re: gcc gives inccorect value for simple expression

On 22/04/16 14:01, c...@center.wakayama-u.ac.jp wrote: The following code, when compiled with gcc, it outputs "7". I have tried it with gcc-4.8.3 and gcc-6.0.1-20160415, both on x86_64 linux, with options -O0, -g, -O2. All of them gave the same answer. When compiled with clang, it gives 6. I

[Bug c++/70755] [ARM] excessive struct alignment for globals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70755 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/70739] VALUE attribute interpretation in a non-interoperable procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70739 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/62236] : error: aggregate value used where an integer was expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62236 simon at pushface dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simon at pushface dot org ---

[Bug target/70763] New: Use SSE for DImode load/store

movlb, %eax movlb+4, %edx movl%eax, a movl%edx, a+4 ret .size foo, .-foo .ident "GCC: (GNU) 7.0.0 20160422 (experimental)" .section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits .file "x2.i&qu

[Bug rtl-optimization/70761] C++ ICE on ppc64le and ppc64 with -m64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70761 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/70762] FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/copy.cc execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin1*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70762 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/70098] PowerPC64: eigen hits ICE following invalid register assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70098 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markos at freevec dot org --- Comment #9

[Bug libstdc++/70762] FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/copy.cc execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin1*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70762 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Also on i386-unknown-freebsd10.3, see https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-04/msg02065.html.

[Bug libstdc++/70762] FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/copy.cc execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin1*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70762 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Ah cool, I should be able to reproduce that, thanks.

[Bug debug/70764] New: PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70764 Bug ID: 70764 Summary: PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/70762] FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/copy.cc execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin1*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70762 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 38327 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38327&action=edit Compressed preprocessed file Note that the problems are located in the procedures test02 and test03.

[Bug c++/66543] False positive warning "variable set but not used"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66543 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/70762] FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/copy.cc execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin1*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70762 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #38327|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/68206] ICE: unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind loop_expr in potential_constant_expression_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68206 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Apr 22 15:39:03 2016 New Revision: 235369 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235369&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/68206 - Fix constexpr diagnostics with loops. PR c

[Bug debug/70764] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70764 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 68206, which changed state. Bug 68206 Summary: ICE: unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind loop_expr in potential_constant_expression_1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68206 What|Removed

[Bug c++/68206] ICE: unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind loop_expr in potential_constant_expression_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68206 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/70738] Add -minteger-only option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70738 --- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw --- AArch64 already has a similar option already. We've called it -mgeneral-regs-only.

[Bug debug/70764] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70764 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think so. gcc.log contains: PASS: a is 0 FAIL: tmp is -1, not 0 FAIL: tmp2 is -1, not 0 PASS: a is 0 FAIL: tmp is -1, not 0 FAIL: tmp2 is -1, not 0 FAIL: tmp3 is -1, not 0 FAIL: 2 PASS, 5 FAIL,

[Bug c++/68530] [C++14] sorry, unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind loop_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68530 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Apr 22 15:39:03 2016 New Revision: 235369 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235369&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/68206 - Fix constexpr diagnostics with loops. PR c

[Bug c++/70522] Hidden friend functions block qualified name lookup into nested unnamed namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70522 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Apr 22 15:38:57 2016 New Revision: 235368 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235368&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/70522 - fix N4381 customization points * name-look

[Bug c++/70522] Hidden friend functions block qualified name lookup into nested unnamed namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70522 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/70719] the libjava testsuite does not work with dejagnu 1.6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70719 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Would it be possible to back port the fix to the other open branches?

[Bug c/65083] Can not indirectly call some C11 atomic library functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65083 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- It's basically a matter of whether you consider adding a new symbol version to be appropriate in a backport.

[Bug preprocessor/16358] -Wno-system-headers hides warning caused by user header vs system header conflict

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16358 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug c/70765] New: GCC fails to detect possibly uninitialized variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70765 Bug ID: 70765 Summary: GCC fails to detect possibly uninitialized variable Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c/70765] GCC fails to detect possibly uninitialized variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70765 --- Comment #1 from Mike Conlen --- Created attachment 38330 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38330&action=edit a second translation unit Using the second translation unit will cause the compilation to error (as expected) wit

[Bug c/70765] GCC fails to detect possibly uninitialized variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70765 --- Comment #2 from Mike Conlen --- If I compile with -O3 the compiler produces (as expected) $ gcc -Wall -Wextra -Werror -save-temps -O3 -c test.c test.c: In function 'try_to_fail': test.c:25:2: error: 'data' is used uninitialized in this funct

[Bug bootstrap/70704] [6 Regression] AIX bootstrap comparison failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70704 --- Comment #37 from Jakub Jelinek --- Marek tried to reproduce this using the RC1 tarball, but it seems it went through comparison just fine; configure line has been: /home/xxx/gcc-6.0.1-RC-20160415/configure --prefix=/home/xxx/rc --enab

[Bug bootstrap/70704] [6 Regression] AIX bootstrap comparison failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70704 --- Comment #38 from David Edelsohn --- The gt* files don't differ. I normally use --disable-werror --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc --with-gmp=/opt/cfarm --with-libiconv-prefix=/opt/cfarm --disable-libstdcxx-pch --with-included-gettext --

[Bug c++/70733] Wrong code with nested structs and bit field.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70733 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- This bug report is for C++, where bit-field width is explicitly not part of the type and bit-field types wider than int are not extensions, not for C, where there is a line of C90 DRs treat

[Bug c/70742] Support div as a builtin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70742 --- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- A script that assumes build = host = target is obviously unacceptable. You can't do any compilations for $target at all when configuring GCC, only when configuring its runtime libraries su

[Bug target/65705] ICE: SIGSEGV in contains_struct_check with -fsanitize=null -fcheck-pointer-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65705 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70522] Hidden friend functions block qualified name lookup into nested unnamed namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70522 --- Comment #5 from Casey Carter --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #4) > (In reply to Casey Carter from comment #2) > > This is a regression of sorts, FWIW, gcc 4.3 compiled it correctly > > (http://melpon.org/wandbox/permlink/Efjfvay0U

[Bug target/69143] PowerPC64: aggregate results are badly handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69143 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64le-linux |powerpc64le-linux,

[Bug tree-optimization/70717] missing warning on trivial buffer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70717 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/57137] spurious "format string is not literal" when the format string is marked with __attribute__((format))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57137 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/70766] New: stream iterators, shared_lock, and atomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70766 Bug ID: 70766 Summary: stream iterators, shared_lock, and atomic should all use addressof and not & Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug c++/70767] New: std::numeric_limits::digits is wrong unless --std=c++11 used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70767 Bug ID: 70767 Summary: std::numeric_limits::digits is wrong unless --std=c++11 used Product: gcc Version: 4.8.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/70768] New: Increased compilation time

--disable-werror Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160422 (experimental) (GCC) [jamrial@ArchVM ~]$ time c++-7 -ftemplate-backtrace-limit=0 -Wall -Wextra -pedantic -Werror -pedantic-errors -Wno-error=deprecated-declarations -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused-parameter -march=haswell -Of

[Bug libstdc++/70745] Wrong handling of regex_constant::match_not_eow and regex_constant::match_not_bow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70745 --- Comment #2 from Tim Shen --- Author: timshen Date: Sat Apr 23 03:58:37 2016 New Revision: 235382 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235382&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/70745 * include/bits/regex_executor.tcc (_Execut

[Bug sanitizer/70712] False positive from AddressSanitizer with use of 'alignas'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70712 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Apr 23 05:28:16 2016 New Revision: 235384 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235384&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/70712 * cfgexpand.c (expand_stack_vars): Fix

[Bug c++/70768] Increased compilation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70768 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/70767] std::numeric_limits::digits is wrong unless --std=c++11 used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70767 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#559 It has status CD1, I don't remember if that means it applies retroactively or not. (by the way, the 4.8 branch is not maintained anymore)