https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70685
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #28 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #27)
> I was arguing that if IPA proves a condition to true/false then it
> should adjust it that way in modification phase.
The thing is that it does not prove i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41138
Vincent Lefèvre changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59666
--- Comment #7 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #6)
> There are no such requirements in ISO C for non-IEEE types;
The standard says nowhere that the rounding directions that are provided by the
implement
ars.cc
.globl _ZN8tcmalloc6Static9pageheap_E
.bss
.align 8
@@ -1173,5 +1198,5 @@
.size _ZN8tcmalloc6Static14pageheap_lock_E, 4
_ZN8tcmalloc6Static14pageheap_lock_E:
.zero 4
- .ident "GCC: (GNU) 6.0.0 20160415 (experimental)"
+ .ident &quo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70684
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70691
Bug ID: 70691
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault with
lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70691
--- Comment #1 from cornelius.mika at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 38287
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38287&action=edit
repro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70691
--- Comment #2 from cornelius.mika at gmail dot com ---
Comment on attachment 38287
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38287
repro
>template
>void demoError(int x, F f)
>{
>const int y = x;
>
>auto lambda = [=](auto g)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60936
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
For the record, I tried this and didn't see any change in code size, so didn't
commit anything.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70691
--- Comment #3 from cornelius.mika at gmail dot com ---
This bug is fixed in GCC 6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64329
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70692
Bug ID: 70692
Summary: No warning when std::function binds a
reference to a temporary
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64329
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> (In reply to Michael Stahl from comment #1)
> > i believe i've hit the same problem
>
> I don't think so. The original bug report is for 4.9.3, and seems to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53833
angelo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||angelo70 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70692
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70692
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Bah, it seems that -Wsystem-headers doesn't get turned off again by the
#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50818
Steven Shi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven.shi at intel dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50818
--- Comment #6 from Steven Shi ---
BTW, latest LLVM/Clang 3.8 release has fixed this va_list ms_abi issue, please
see below email thread. Does GCC really cannot fix it as LLVM/Clang? This issue
really impact Uefi firmware building with GCC.
http
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64883
--- Comment #37 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Still present at revision r235031 with more failures, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-04/msg01541.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70693
Bug ID: 70693
Summary: valgrind error in get_visual_column
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70689
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64883
--- Comment #38 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Please create a PR for the experimental/filesystem FAILs, they're almost
certainly all due to a single error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70694
Bug ID: 70694
Summary: 50 experimental/filesystem/* failures on
x86_64-apple-darwin10
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70694
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64883
--- Comment #39 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Please create a PR for the experimental/filesystem FAILs, they're almost
> certainly all due to a single error.
PR70694.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70694
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Why is it hidden in the archive? This doesn't seem like a libstdc++ bug, given
that the destructor is defined like so:
namespace std _GLIBCXX_VISIBILITY(default)
{
...
~path() = default;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70695
Bug ID: 70695
Summary: [C++14] ICE in a herdly complicated compile-time
metaprogramming
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70018
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Apr 16 16:30:48 2016
New Revision: 235063
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235063&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/70018
* cgraph.c (cgraph_node::get_availability):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68737
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
14220.cc fails due stack growth:
-bash-4.3$ ./14220.exe
Pid 28500 received a SIGSEGV for stack growth failure.
Possible causes: insufficient memory or swap space,
or stack size exceeded maxssiz.
Segmen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57093
--- Comment #3 from Damian Rouson ---
This bug report can be closed now. The submitted code completes without error
with gfortran 5.3 and 6.0.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57093
--- Comment #4 from Damian Rouson ---
This bug report can be closed now. The submitted code completes without error
with gfortran 5.3 and 6.0.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57093
Damian Rouson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57093
--- Comment #6 from Damian Rouson ---
And it works with gfortran 4.9.3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70694
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 38291
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38291&action=edit
don't jam visibility for newer Darwin
Dominique, please could you try this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55905
Damian Rouson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50818
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
As a workaround, you can try
__builtin_ms_va_list ap;
__builtin_ms_va_start (ap, n);
__builtin_ms_va_end (ap);
instead of
__builtin_va_list ap;
__builtin_va_start (ap, n);
__builtin_va_end (ap);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70696
Bug ID: 70696
Summary: [6.0] ICE on EVENT POST of host-associated EVENT_TYPE
coarray
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70697
Bug ID: 70697
Summary: ICE on EVENT WAIT with array element UNTIL_COUNT
argument
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70697
--- Comment #1 from Damian Rouson ---
The ICE disappears if the UNTIL_COUNT is a scalar instead of an array element.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50818
--- Comment #8 from David Woodhouse ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> As a workaround, you can try
> __builtin_ms_va_*
> instead of
> __builtin_va_*
The problem is that in the UEFI build we don't *know* what ABI we'll be built
wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70018
--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Apr 16 18:54:49 2016
New Revision: 235065
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235065&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/70018
* cgraph.c (cgraph_set_const_flag_1): Only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70698
Bug ID: 70698
Summary: ICE in autoconf test for C++11 features
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66240
--- Comment #4 from Denis Vlasenko ---
Created attachment 38293
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38293&action=edit
Proposed patch
This patch implements -falign-functions=N[,M] for now, with the eye for easy
extension to other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70696
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150
--- Comment #15 from psturm at computervoice dot com ---
Tested with hjl/pr70150 branch and no unexpected errors using
--enable-default-pie.
However, when testing the same branch with both --enable-default-pie and
--enable-default-ssp, a couple n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
--- Comment #15 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Sat Apr 16 23:22:52 2016
New Revision: 235066
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235066&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-04-16 Sandra Loosemore
PR target/1078
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70696
--- Comment #2 from Damian Rouson ---
If I recall correctly, support for events just barely missed being included in
5.3, but will appear versions 5.4 and higher. There probably is no reason way
to port this back to the 4.9 branch because versio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70183
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Sun Apr 17 05:22:04 2016
New Revision: 235072
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235072&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Propagate dump flags in pass_manager::register_pass
2016-04-17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70185
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Sun Apr 17 05:22:33 2016
New Revision: 235074
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235074&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Only finalize dot files that have been initialized
2016-04-17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70256
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Sun Apr 17 05:22:19 2016
New Revision: 235073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add debug_varinfo and debug_varmap
2016-04-17 Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68875
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Sun Apr 17 05:21:50 2016
New Revision: 235071
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235071&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add pass parameter to TERMINATE_PASS_LIST
2016-04-17 Tom de Vr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70433
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Sun Apr 17 05:23:15 2016
New Revision: 235077
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235077&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Handle backslash in pp_write_text_as_dot_label_to_stream
2016-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68875
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70183
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70256
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70185
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70433
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70433
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70699
Bug ID: 70699
Summary: Add pr70161.c test-case
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70699
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from vrie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70700
Bug ID: 70700
Summary: ICE using -fdump-tree-all-graph option
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70700
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 38294
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38294&action=edit
parse.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70700
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
65 matches
Mail list logo
