https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70685
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70685
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70685
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 15 19:47:19 2016
New Revision: 235045
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235045&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70685
* constexpr.c (get_fundef_copy): Handle null
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70685
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 15 19:53:03 2016
New Revision: 235046
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235046&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70685
* constexpr.c (get_fundef_copy): Handle null
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70687
Bug ID: 70687
Summary: Undefined shift in change_zero_ext in combine.c
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #23 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #20)
> Thanks very much to everyone who has looked into this so far. It would be
> very helpful to get answers to the following questions, so we can understand
> the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70687
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59562
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41138
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59753
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70684
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70688
Bug ID: 70688
Summary: bogus OpenACC data clause errors involving reductions
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70484
--- Comment #7 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
On 04/04/2016 12:37 PM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Fixed on trunk sofar.
Thanks. I've checked some variations of the original testcase --
everything works fine now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69960
--- Comment #13 from Bernd Schmidt ---
I actually tried this a few weeks ago, it's slightly less trivial than it seems
since you don't want to fold away the inside of &("fish"[0]).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70682
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #24 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #23)
> (In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #20)
> > Thanks very much to everyone who has looked into this so far. It would be
> > very helpful to get answers to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70684
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #25 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #22)
> I suppose the easiest fix is to overload the value field to store the
> size of the access for these two codes and then add the missing check.
OK, so the IS_NO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70552
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70624
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
This is fixed on x86_64-apple-darwin10 without regression on
x86_64-apple-darwin15 by the following patch
--- ../_clean/libsanitizer/asan/asan_mac.cc 2015-11-23 10:17:05.0
+0100
+++ libsan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #26 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #24)
>
> Yes, I'm looking for a general way to either prevent or try to detect
> potential other cases of the bug throughout the entire kernel.
>
> Can it only occu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70684
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
This slightly modified version of the testcase shows the bug with Linux:
program test
implicit none
integer,parameter :: isize=12
integer,parameter :: funit=12
integer :: i
character(1), parameter :: cr=char
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70616
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29280
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-02-21 00:38:52 |2016-4-15
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67180
czlz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luo_12yan at 163 dot com
--- Comment #5 from czlz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38295
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70616
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
The following test case where test is not a function template does not ICE but
it aborts at runtime because a == 2 at the end of execution:
static int a;
struct A
{
virtual ~A () { a++; }
};
struct B :
: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160415 (experimental) [trunk revision 235013] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -m32 -O0 small.c
$ gcc-5.3 -m32 -O1 small.c
$
$ gcc-trunk -m32 -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70684
--- Comment #4 from Andy May ---
Yes, I agree that demonstrates the bug - and I see it gives the desired output
with 4.8.3 but not with 5.3.0.
However, I would actually not mind if that modified testcase continued not to
'work' on Linux since th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #27 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On April 15, 2016 11:58:39 PM GMT+02:00, "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
>
>--- Comment #26 from Martin Jambor ---
>(In reply to Josh Poim
101 - 130 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
