https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70675
Bug ID: 70675
Summary: [6 Regression] compare-debug failure building LLVM
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70674
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68814
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70671
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70666
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70675
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70617
--- Comment #7 from Jan Smets ---
Should I open a different issue for that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
--- Comment #30 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Apr 15 07:28:44 2016
New Revision: 235006
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235006&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-04-15 Richard Biener
Alan Modra
PR tree-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70675
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 38277
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38277&action=edit
unreduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70675
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 38278
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38278&action=edit
somewhat reduced testcase
~300k seems to be the smallest possible size.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70133
--- Comment #14 from Christophe Lyon ---
We (Linaro) have backported the relevant patches to our 5.x branch, and this
fix is available in our 5.3-2016.04 snapshot.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70662
--- Comment #2 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Fri Apr 15 08:25:49 2016
New Revision: 235008
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235008&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
AVX-512. Fix mem operand modifier for Intel syntax.
PR target/70662
gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67701
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Note the issue should be partly mitigated by the fix for PR70424. The issue
in comment#6 is still there as we still trust the alignment of an underlying
decl more than the alignment info present on the MEM_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70676
Bug ID: 70676
Summary: suboptimal code generation on AVR
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67701
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
The reason for the legacy on x86 targets is indeed not present on
strict-alignment platforms if it is the case that on strict-alignment platforms
unaligned accesses trap (and are not merely slow).
Index: g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70677
Bug ID: 70677
Summary: Suboptimal cond on AVR: unneeded stack frame
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70678
Bug ID: 70678
Summary: Static function compilation behaviour changes with
__attribute__((optimize("O2"))) even if already
compiling with -O2
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69633
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70568
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70624
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70651
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70675
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Does removing "deletable" from the constexpr_call_table fix it? Does playing
with GC parameters allow further reduction?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70674
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70675
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70675
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70675
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Which means playing with gc parameters might reduce it to sth suitable for the
testsuite?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70679
Bug ID: 70679
Summary: [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug building LLVM with
checking=release compiler
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70662
--- Comment #3 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Fri Apr 15 09:36:31 2016
New Revision: 235013
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235013&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
AVX-512. Use proper mem ops modifier for Intel syntax in broadcast patte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70679
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70678
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Declaring test_function inline and using -Winline shows:
t.c:4:52: warning: inlining failed in call to ‘test_function’: optimization
level attribute mismatch [-Winline]
static inline void __attribute__((op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70679
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Can you see if the fix in PR70675 works? That is, is this a dup?
Unfortunately no.
> Does reducing GC params make it reproduce with the .ii file?
--p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 38279
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38279&action=edit
gcc6-pr70436-omp.patch
Untested fix for OpenMP/OpenACC/Cilk+/#pragma GCC ivdep, both C and C++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70679
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70675
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70680
Bug ID: 70680
Summary: [5/6 Regression] OpenMP SIMD linear variable
privatized too eagerly
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70680
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70681
Bug ID: 70681
Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ira-shrinkwrap-prep-2.c
gcc.dg/pr10474.c on arm and powerpc
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70681
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70680
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70678
--- Comment #2 from Lukas Martini ---
Hi,
thanks for testing. I have to admit the explanation regarding how the various
switches play together went a little over my head, but if you tell me that's
intended behaviour, I'll trust your word on it :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70651
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 15 12:24:18 2016
New Revision: 235020
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235020&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/70436
c/
* c-parser.c (c_parser_pragma): Add IF_P ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70019
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 15 12:29:32 2016
New Revision: 235021
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235021&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69517
PR c++/70019
PR c++/70588
* g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 15 12:29:32 2016
New Revision: 235021
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235021&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69517
PR c++/70019
PR c++/70588
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 15 12:29:32 2016
New Revision: 235021
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235021&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69517
PR c++/70019
PR c++/70588
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239
--- Comment #21 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #20)
> From gcc-testresults, it seems it only fails with -mx32 -fpic, and not with
> plain -mx32, but that is all I can find out.
See:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70681
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Fri Apr 15 12:45:20 2016
New Revision: 235024
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235024&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[testsuite] PR rtl-optimization/70681: XFAIL ira-shrinkwra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239
--- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 38281
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38281&action=edit
A testcase
Compile it with -O2 -S -mx32.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239
--- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #20)
> The empty class passing ABI changes were reverted and are going to be
> resolved only for GCC7+.
> I've tried your testcase (and latest preprocessed hash_policy.ii fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70681
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Summary|[6 R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70675
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 15 13:07:43 2016
New Revision: 235025
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235025&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70675
* tree-pretty-print.c (do_niy): Add FLAGS arg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70675
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70505
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70651
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Apr 15 13:15:23 2016
New Revision: 235027
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235027&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/70651
* c-common.c (build_va_arg): Change two asse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70651
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Honza? This seems to be somewhat fragile (redirecting things to unreachable
> but _not_ changing the actual predicates in the IL). Claiming the
> predicate is constant true is also a bit bogus (as can be s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70662
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
The fix is incomplete:
[hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ /export/build/gnu/gcc-x32/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/xgcc
-B/export/build/gnu/gcc-x32/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/ -mx32 -mtune=slm
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673
--- Comment #4 from David Kinniburgh ---
It seems the problem usually arises when there is reassignment in one line, eg
character(:), allocatable: s, t
s = s(2:) ! or even s = s
whereas forcing the temporary
t = s(2:)
s = t
seems to work. But
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #17 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14)
> (In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #13)
> > Interestingly, the function's epilogue (frame pointer restore) and return
> > instruction are also getting d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70671
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka ---
Josh: This is limitation of ipa-prop tracking. It very easily gives up on
determinging constantness of aggregate parameter. Hope Martin will fix it next
stage1. WIP patches was done few releases back but not m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #20 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
Thanks very much to everyone who has looked into this so far. It would be very
helpful to get answers to the following questions, so we can understand the
impact to the kernel:
1) Is there a reliable way
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70682
Bug ID: 70682
Summary: [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug building LLVM with
checking=release compiler on ppc64le
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21150
--- Comment #7 from Denis Vlasenko ---
Fixed at least in 4.7.2, maybe earlier. With -m32 -fomit-frame-pointer -O2:
a: movzbl v+45, %eax
xorbv+36, %al
xorbv, %al
xorbv+54, %al
xorbv+63, %al
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70683
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70683
Bug ID: 70683
Summary: [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug bug with
-fsanitize=address
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On April 15, 2016 3:31:33 PM GMT+02:00, "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
>
>--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka ---
>> Honza? This seems to b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70671
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Apr 15 14:46:06 2016
New Revision: 235032
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235032&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/70671
* c-typeck.c (build_unary_op): Pass location
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70671
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70683
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I guess most or all hash tables using iterative_hash_expr as hashing function
and operand_equal_p as comparison function are affected.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #51 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 15 14:51:06 2016
New Revision: 235033
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235033&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70594
* constexpr.c (constexpr_call_table): Preser
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70662
--- Comment #5 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Fri Apr 15 15:13:42 2016
New Revision: 235037
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235037&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
AVX-512, Fix mode size check.
PR target/70662
gcc/
* config/i38
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70662
--- Comment #6 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Fri Apr 15 15:17:31 2016
New Revision: 235038
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235038&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
AVX-512. Fix mode size check.
PR target/70662
gcc/
* config/i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70662
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 15 15:53:01 2016
New Revision: 235040
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235040&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/70662
* config/i386/sse.md (define_insn "_vec_du
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64329
Michael Stahl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mstahl at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64329
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oops, the original report was for 4.9.1, but the bug is still present in 4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64329
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Michael Stahl from comment #1)
> i believe i've hit the same problem
I don't think so. The original bug report is for 4.9.3, and seems to be an
actual compiler bug that is fixed already in GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70682
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70505
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 15 16:32:22 2016
New Revision: 235042
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235042&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70505
* pt.c (tsubst_baselink): Give the new TEMPL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70684
Bug ID: 70684
Summary: incorrect reading of values from file on Windows
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67164
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 15 17:03:33 2016
New Revision: 235043
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235043&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67164
* pt.c (copy_template_args): New.
(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70668
--- Comment #4 from Stefan Reinauer ---
Thanks to Segher Boessenkool, https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/14380/2 fixes the
issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70668
--- Comment #5 from Stefan Reinauer ---
Created attachment 38283
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38283&action=edit
Fix for the issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65434
Patrick J. LoPresti changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lopresti at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70685
Bug ID: 70685
Summary: [6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70686
Bug ID: 70686
Summary: -fprofile-generate (not fprofile-use) somehow produces
much faster binary
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70685
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
markus@x4 tmp % cat sum.ii
namespace std {
template struct A { static constexpr _Tp value = __v;
};
typedef A false_type;
template using conditional_t = _Iftrue;
namespace hana {
template struct is_d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20562
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28901
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mueller at kde dot org
--- Comment #38 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69960
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54823
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69960
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||devel at fresse dot org
--- Comment #12 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #22 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #18)
> Jakub: There is indeed aliasing issue, but with -fno-strict-aliasing the bug
> is the same.
>
> Apparently this is ipa-prop bug, because ipa-prop does not track
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59976
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
