https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70457
--- Comment #13 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Mon Apr 4 15:45:59 2016
New Revision: 234717
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234717&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-04-04 Bill Schmidt
Jakub Jelinek
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70457
--- Comment #14 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Mon Apr 4 15:47:51 2016
New Revision: 234718
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234718&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-04-04 Bill Schmidt
Jakub Jelinek
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70457
--- Comment #15 from Bill Schmidt ---
Matthias, the code is now fixed everywhere upstream. Do you need a merge into
ibm/gcc-5-branch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70457
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70528
--- Comment #10 from Ville Voutilainen ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> I don't know how to implement is_default_constructible without using that
> decltype, or something similar that will cause the same problem.
>
> If we had
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66223
--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Apr 4 15:54:39 2016
New Revision: 234719
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234719&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/66223
* ipa-devirt.c (maybe_record_node): Do not o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66223
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] Diagnostic |[5 Regression] Diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70379
Andre Vieira changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70529
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70173
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Mon Apr 4 16:37:58 2016
New Revision: 234721
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234721&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gnattools: Clean config.cache (PR70173)
The config.cache file shoul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70176
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70379
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||craie at acm dot org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70373
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70532
Bug ID: 70532
Summary: An "constexpr + variable template" example that gives
an "internal compiler error"
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70307
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Apr 4 17:20:53 2016
New Revision: 234723
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234723&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/70307
* gcc.dg/torture/pr70307.c: Add -Wno-p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70018
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70512
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70357
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70533
Bug ID: 70533
Summary: reductions on reference-typed variables are broken in
OpenACC
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70512
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70512
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'd note that we likely need to modify them in-place, as PARM_DECLs etc. with
those types already will be around.
for (t = TYPE_POINTER_TO (to_type); t; t = TYPE_NEXT_PTR_TO (t))
and
for (t = TYPE_REFERENCE_T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70512
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #3)
> Are you working on that? If so, please reassign this bug.
I'm not currently. But I think the approach you outlines makes sense; I just
didn't get round to wri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70534
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openacc
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70534
Bug ID: 70534
Summary: openacc parallel reductions aren't neutered
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70535
Bug ID: 70535
Summary: broken nested reductions in openacc parallel regions
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70353
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincent.picaud at laposte dot
net
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70532
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66460
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70353
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #20 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 66460, which changed state.
Bug 66460 Summary: ICE using __func__ in constexpr function.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66460
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70461
Alexander Fomin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38134|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14505
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30971
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359
--- Comment #15 from Fredrik Hederstierna
---
Created attachment 38185
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38185&action=edit
tok.c
I took another example for CSiBE and stripped it down. I'm not 100% sure it is
the exact same is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 58062, which changed state.
Bug 58062 Summary: [C++11] bogus __func__ lookup in lambda body
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58062
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58062
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67172
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Apr 4 22:29:45 2016
New Revision: 234728
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234728&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/67172
* libgcc2.c (L__main): Undefine __LIB
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67172
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Apr 4 22:29:02 2016
New Revision: 234727
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234727&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/67172
* libgcc2.c (L__main): Undefine __LIBG
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67172
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70536
Bug ID: 70536
Summary: g++ doesn't emit DW_AT_name for
DW_TAG_GNU_formal_parameter_pack
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70536
Ed Catmur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ed at catmur dot co.uk
--- Comment #1 from E
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14505
Alex Rosenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|WONTFIX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70117
--- Comment #14 from Alan Modra ---
> if (fmt == &ibm_extended_double)
No, there is mips_extended_format too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14505
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70452
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka ---
Author: ppalka
Date: Tue Apr 5 01:20:00 2016
New Revision: 234732
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234732&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove class cache_map and use ggc hash_maps instead (PR c++/70452)
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70537
Bug ID: 70537
Summary: ICE segfault compiling jar with gcj
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70538
Bug ID: 70538
Summary: deprecated "access declaration" evokes gcc_unreachable
ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70538
--- Comment #1 from jim at meyering dot net ---
FYI, that same ICE strikes also with gcc-4.9.3, gcc-5.1.0 and gcc-5.3.0 when
using -std=c++11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70538
--- Comment #2 from jim at meyering dot net ---
Small correction:
It's not "while attempting to emit...", but rather "after emitting that
warning".
++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160404 (experimental) [trunk revision 234712] (GCC)
$
$ g++-5.3 -c small.cpp
small.cpp: In function ‘void foo()’:
small.cpp:4:8: error: ‘f’ does not name a type
auto f = [&] { retu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70541
Bug ID: 70541
Summary: unnoticed invalid dereference when using address
sanitizer
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70540
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70540
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.0 |4.9.4
Summary|[6 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70540
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14505
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14505
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Talking about clang, it gets it wrong, returns 0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70540
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
commit f153f0531fbf0c8a5454ba6662b8819a6831bea6
Author: jason
Date: Sun Mar 17 02:41:22 2013 +
PR c++/54277
* cp-tree.h (WILDCARD_TYPE_P): Split out from...
(MAYBE_CLASS_TYPE_P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70510
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Kirill Yukhin from comment #1)
> will take a look.
I have patch in testing:
-- cut here--
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
index 5fd650f..16ec696 100644
--- a/gcc/conf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70537
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70529
--- Comment #2 from Axel Naumann ---
Hi Jakub,
Thanks for your reply!
Let me try to explain better then.
This code
auto a = 0x123p2;
auto b = 0x123p-2;
compiles just fine until the recent hexfloat change. Now, the second line will
trigger an
101 - 160 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
