[Bug fortran/70312] Spurious -Wsurprising warnings for final subroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70312 neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug fortran/58175] [OOP] Incorrect warning message on scalar finalizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58175 neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||neil.n.carlson at gmail

[Bug tree-optimization/70263] New: ICE at -O1 and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (segmentation fault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70263 Bug ID: 70263 Summary: ICE at -O1 and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (segmentation fault) Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/70314] New: AVX512 not using kandw to combine comparison results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70314 Bug ID: 70314 Summary: AVX512 not using kandw to combine comparison results Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancem

[Bug tree-optimization/70291] New: muldc3 code generation could be smarter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70291 Bug ID: 70291 Summary: muldc3 code generation could be smarter Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimi

[Bug fortran/69604] ICE in gfc_add_modify_loc, at fortran/trans.c:159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #3 from

[Bug target/70232] [6 regression] excessive stack usage with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70232 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com,

[Bug bootstrap/67728] Build fails when cross-compiling with in-tree GMP and ISL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67728 --- Comment #17 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Andrew Roberts from comment #15) > not entirely clear what you mean by reproducing the issue without > downloading mpfr, mpc, isl etc. Do you mean the missing symbol in GMP or the > issues with GM

[Bug fortran/70260] New: ICE: gimplification failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70260 Bug ID: 70260 Summary: ICE: gimplification failed Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assign

[Bug c++/70299] pow(long double, int) gives more imprecise result than pow(long double,long double) in c++03 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70299 --- Comment #1 from Ruslan --- The machine I tested it was Ubuntu 15.10, uname -a gives Linux integral3-amd64 4.2.0-22-generic #27-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 17 22:57:08 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux , libc is Ubuntu GLIBC 2.21-0ubuntu4.

[Bug debug/70297] New: GCC Segfaults when using -g3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70297 Bug ID: 70297 Summary: GCC Segfaults when using -g3 Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug Assi

[Bug c++/70277] Improve code generation for large initializer lists

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70277 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Let's look at #include #include int main () { std::vector v { "0", "1", "2" }; } which is IMHO below the limit for the proposed optimization, but on the other side easier to explain. We already h

[Bug tree-optimization/70267] New: ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in propagate_necessity, at tree-ssa-dce.c:924

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70267 Bug ID: 70267 Summary: ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in propagate_necessity, at tree-ssa-dce.c:924 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/70232] [6 regression] excessive stack usage with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70232 --- Comment #11 from Arnd Bergmann --- For reference, I have sent a patch to the kernel to replace the open-coded byteswap with a __builtin_bswap64. This produces much better object code with both gcc-5 and gcc-6 than the original version, so it'

[Bug target/70296] Incorrect handling of vector X; if X is function-like macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70296 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c/70281] valgrind error in can_be_stored_compactly_p (line-map.c:148)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70281 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Fri Mar 18 17:45:42 2016 New Revision: 234340 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234340&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/70281: C FE: fix uninitialized range for __builtin_types_compatibl

[Bug c++/70301] missing diagnostic on taking the address of a temporary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70301 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Okay, here's a slightly less contrived test case: struct A { int a [1]; }; struct B { int b [2]; }; A foo (); B bar (); int *p = foo ().a; int *q = bar ().b; This test case should also illustr

[Bug target/70133] AArch64 -mtune=native generates improperly formatted -march parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70133 --- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon --- > 3) We should think about whether we need to put out these +no extension > strings at all. I don't like that for my older systems I'll need to keep > updating my binutils to cover any new extension string

[Bug sanitizer/67899] build failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67899 --- Comment #5 from Hinrich Gilhaus --- Many thanks for the patch. It resolves my problems with gcc-5.3.0 on gentoo-linux (sparc64).

[Bug bootstrap/67728] Build fails when cross-compiling with in-tree GMP and ISL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67728 --- Comment #18 from Marc Glisse --- Ah, I managed to reproduce. GMP has a nice "CFLAGS= -g -DNO_ASM" in its Makefile, but gcc overrides it by calling make CFLAGS=-g. Not much we can do from the GMP side (and ISL is innocent). Well, maybe the def

[Bug c/64748] OpenACC: "is not a variable" error with deviceptr()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64748 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70277] Improve code generation for large initializer lists

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70277 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/70237] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Incorrect 0.0 output with PF format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70237 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/70113] [AArch64] -mpc-relative-literal-loads conflicts with fix-cortex-a53-843419

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70113 --- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon --- I posted a follow-up testsuite patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00777.html

[Bug middle-end/70280] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with --param=integer-share-limit=4016 -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70280 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/70121] [5/6 Regression] spurious warning and crash when returning a reference from lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70121 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug lto/70289] New: [openacc] ICE in input_varpool_node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70289 Bug ID: 70289 Summary: [openacc] ICE in input_varpool_node Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto A

[Bug sanitizer/70147] [6 Regression] testcase from hana testsuite gets miscompiled with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70147 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70218] [5/6 Regression] Illegal access to private fields succeeds with 5/6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70218 --- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Fri Mar 18 01:23:26 2016 New Revision: 234316 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234316&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR c++/70218 (illegal access to private field succeeds) gcc/cp/Chang

[Bug libstdc++/67114] [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely --- So I suggest something like: friend bool operator<(thread::id __x, thread::id __y) noexcept - { return __x._M_thread < __y._M_thread; } + { +#ifdef PTW32_VERSION + // impleme

[Bug lto/70289] [openacc] ICE in input_varpool_node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70289 --- Comment #3 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 38021 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38021&action=edit reduced test case If you take a look at the gimple code for Tom's test, you'll see that there isn't a

[Bug middle-end/70245] [6 Regression] Miscompilation of ICU on i386 with atom tuning starting with r227382

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70245 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/70261] [6 Regression] r234265 causes fails on rs6000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70261 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- While the patch successfully bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64/i686, on powerpc64{,le} it bootstrapped, but still has numerous regressions: +FAIL: gcc.dg/vmx/gcc-bug-f.c -Os (internal compiler error) +FAIL:

[Bug c++/70272] [5 Regression] -flifetime-dse miscompilation starting with r217967

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70272 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6 Regression]|[5 Regression] |-flife

[Bug lto/70283] [6 regression] bogus vtable mismatch warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70283 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto Version|unknown

[Bug sanitizer/70147] [6 Regression] testcase from hana testsuite gets miscompiled with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70147 --- Comment #28 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #27) > (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #26) > > I just fail to understand why we cannot just clobber the whole > > object once in the in-charge constructor, >

[Bug lto/69953] [5/6 Regression] Using lto causes gtkmm/gparted and gtkmm/inkscape compile to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69953 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot com --- Comment #18 fr

[Bug fortran/69604] ICE in gfc_add_modify_loc, at fortran/trans.c:159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604 --- Comment #4 from Harald Anlauf --- Cases z1, z2 are invalid codes: ifort: pr69604-z1.f90(2): error #6579: A dummy argument of a statement function is invalid in this context. [N] x(n) = n() --^ compilation aborted for pr69604-z1

[Bug testsuite/66400] g++.dg/stackprotectexplicit2.C FAILs with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66400 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c++

[Bug fortran/70235] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Incorrect output with PF format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70235 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- *** Bug 70237 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/70273] [6 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/ext/label13a.C -std=gnu++98 execution test / scan-assembler _ZN1CC4Ev

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70273 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Perhaps has_label_address_in_static_1 could move to cp/optimize.c and be done next to the tree_versionable_function_p call in there, with appropriate comment?

[Bug target/70188] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc 4.9+ miscompiles code on hppa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70188 --- Comment #11 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Thu Mar 17 22:57:19 2016 New Revision: 234311 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234311&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/70188 * config/pa/constraints.md: Revert

[Bug c++/70275] New: -w disables all -Werror flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70275 Bug ID: 70275 Summary: -w disables all -Werror flags Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assig

[Bug libstdc++/67114] [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114 --- Comment #20 from ralphengels at gmail dot com --- Clarification. If not using pthreads-w32 #ifdef PTW32_VERSION // See libstdc++/67114 # define _GLIBCXX_THREAD_ID_LESS(X, Y) ((X).x < (Y).x) <- this #endif would end up undefined if say we b

[Bug target/38239] [4.9, 5, 6 regression] The function mcount in gmon.o changes register ecx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38239 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth --- Author: ro Date: Wed Mar 16 11:57:02 2016 New Revision: 234256 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234256&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Save call-clobbered registers in _mcount on 32-bit Solaris/x86 (PR target/38239

[Bug rtl-optimization/70030] [LRA]ICE when reload insn with output scratch operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70030 --- Comment #5 from Renlin Li --- (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #3) > (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #2) > > Waiting. > > Actually, I have a candidate patch to deal with scratches created during > LRA. But I can not

[Bug libstdc++/70303] Value-initialized debug iterators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70303 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/70240] [6 Regression] ICE: in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:4854 with -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70240 --- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson --- Author: rth Date: Wed Mar 16 23:53:01 2016 New Revision: 234271 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234271&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Gimplify vec_cond_expr with condition inside PR middle-end/70240 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/70288] ICE with -O1 -fno-tree-dominator-opts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70288 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/70278] [6 regression] LRA ICE on trunk for ARM Thumb1 with Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70278 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/70315] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/sra-17.c scan-tree-dump-times esra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70315 Bug ID: 70315 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/sra-17.c scan-tree-dump-times esra Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c/70255] change of the order of summation of floating point numbers despite no-associative-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70255 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug middle-end/70274] New: optimization goes astray and adds completely redundant code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70274 Bug ID: 70274 Summary: optimization goes astray and adds completely redundant code Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c++/69315] [6 Regression] ICE in finish_function with constexpr and templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69315 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Yes, but the patch hasn't been pinged since 24 Feb 2016: . Alex?

[Bug c/70281] valgrind error in can_be_stored_compactly_p (line-map.c:148)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70281 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/70316] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr68714.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " <= " 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70316 Bug ID: 70316 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr68714.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " <= " 1 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/62212] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE compiling template function with array reference parameter whose size depends on a template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62212 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug fortran/49627] NINT(x,16) doesn't work (at all, ever, I don't think)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49627 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug lto/69953] [5/6 Regression] Using lto causes gtkmm/gparted and gtkmm/inkscape compile to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69953 --- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka --- > _ZTCN3Gtk14TreeViewColumnE0_N4Glib6ObjectE/10 > (_ZTCN3Gtk14TreeViewColumnE0_N4Glib6ObjectE) @0x76816980 Aha, this is an construction vtable and the privatization is done by: /* Don't export construct

[Bug middle-end/70273] [6 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/ext/label13a.C -std=gnu++98 execution test / scan-assembler _ZN1CC4Ev

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70273 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Looks like FE constructor cloning "breaks" this by not having the new flag set before gimplification.

[Bug libfortran/69799] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_allocate_3.f08 at -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69799 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > New Revision: 234240 > > Log: > PR libfortran/69799 > * gfortran.dg/coarray_allocate_5.f08: Add "-latomic" option if > libatomic_available. I think the change has not been applied

[Bug c++/70218] [5 Regression] Illegal access to private fields succeeds with 5/6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70218 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6 Regression] Illegal|[5 Regression] Illegal

[Bug libstdc++/67114] [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114 ralphengels at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #38009|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c/70262] Segmentation fault with large stack array, no fault when alloca the same size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70262 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70139] [5/6 Regression] -fno-ellide-constructor makes static std::regex to throw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70139 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Disabling the trivial copy ctor shortcut handling fixes this: --- constexpr.c.xx 2016-03-11 17:37:42.0 +0100 +++ constexpr.c 2016-03-18 18:18:59.579595563 +0100 @@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ cxx_eval_ca

[Bug fortran/70260] ICE: gimplification failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70260 --- Comment #5 from Harald Anlauf --- (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #4) Funny. Doubling the bad assignment subroutine s (f) integer, external :: f, g integer :: h g = f(2) g = f(2) end gives: pr70260-z3.f90:5:4: g

[Bug target/70293] [ICE, AVX-512] Wrong reg constraints in vec_dup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70293 --- Comment #1 from Kirill Yukhin --- We've got duplication of patterns (make mddump): ;; /export/users/kyukhin/gcc/git/gcc2/gcc/config/i386/sse.md: 17107 (define_insn ("avx2_pbroadcastv8hi") [ (set (match_operand:V8HI 0 ("register_o

[Bug c++/70266] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: unexpected expression ‘foo’ of kind overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70266 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Status|U

[Bug fortran/69604] ICE in gfc_add_modify_loc, at fortran/trans.c:159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604 --- Comment #6 from Harald Anlauf --- (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #5) > The problem in case for is in the l.h.s. of the assignment, not the r.h.s: Even simpler, it's just the complex assignment: program p complex :: z[*], w = 1

[Bug target/70048] [6 Regression][AArch64] Inefficient local array addressing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70048 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/70273] New: [6 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/ext/label13a.C -std=gnu++98 execution test / scan-assembler _ZN1CC4Ev

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70273 Bug ID: 70273 Summary: [6 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/ext/label13a.C -std=gnu++98 execution test / scan-assembler _ZN1CC4Ev Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/70282] cc1plus hangs taking 100% CPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70282 --- Comment #1 from PeteVine --- It was doing the hogging for over 7h overnight so the chances it would ever complete are rather slim...

[Bug c++/70139] [5/6 Regression] -fno-ellide-constructor makes static std::regex to throw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70139 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- template struct A { T a; U b; constexpr A () : a (), b () { } constexpr A (const A &x) : a (x.a), b (x.b) { } constexpr A (const T &x, const U &y) : a (x), b (y) { } }; struct B { constexpr B (co

[Bug fortran/69043] Trying to include a directory causes an infinite loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69043 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Mar 19 20:28:38 2016 New Revision: 234352 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234352&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-03-19 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/69043 * scanne

[Bug libstdc++/67114] [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114 --- Comment #22 from ralphengels at gmail dot com --- Aye the pthreads specific fixes needs to be taken care of upstream. The comment was just to let people know that the gcc changes are not enough. Ill try and get a hold on the current maintai

[Bug c++/70265] ICE on code with constexpr on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree check: expected statement_list, have nop_expr in tsi_start, at tree-iterator.h:42

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70265 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/69739] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE during array result, allocatable assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69739 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #3 from

[Bug bootstrap/67728] Build fails when cross-compiling with in-tree GMP and ISL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67728 --- Comment #19 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #18) > I think this issue was already described in another PR. Ah, that was PR 69134 for MPFR. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg00127.html

[Bug target/70232] [6 regression] excessive stack usage with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70232 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- But not sure how this became a regression - does GCC 5 really do better here? With -fno-tree-dominator-opts the warning no longer triggers and we get sub sp, sp, #428 so it may be another jump

[Bug bootstrap/69513] LTO bootstrap fails with bootstrap-profiled during linking gnat1 in stagefeedback

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69513 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug fortran/70260] ICE: gimplification failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70260 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- ifort says: t.f90(3): error #6643: This statement is incorrectly positioned. procedure g --^ t.f90(3): error #8168: Parentheses are required after the PROCEDURE keyword. procedure g --^

[Bug sanitizer/70147] [6 Regression] testcase from hana testsuite gets miscompiled with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70147 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #20) > I don't think that's a problem; the clobber only affects the as-base size of > the class, which doesn't include any virtual bases unless they are primary, > and

[Bug target/66660] [ia64] Speculative load not checked before use, leading to a NaT Consumption Vector interruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/70261] [6 Regression] r234265 causes fails on rs6000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70261 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 Summary|r234265 causes fa

[Bug tree-optimization/70267] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in propagate_necessity, at tree-ssa-dce.c:924

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70267 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/70256] Add debug_varinfo and debug_varmap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70256 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Priority|P3

[Bug c/70262] New: Segmentation fault with large stack array, no fault when alloca the same size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70262 Bug ID: 70262 Summary: Segmentation fault with large stack array, no fault when alloca the same size Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug fortran/70235] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Incorrect output with PF format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70235 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #4) > I will get started on this one. Dominique, if you spot the problem let me > know. In determine_precision, one has: int precision = f->u.real.d; // "3" as "F8

[Bug c++/64697] C++11 thread_local: relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `TLS init function for N::ptd'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64697 Václav Haisman changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.9.2 |5.3.0 --- Comment #16 from Václav Haism

[Bug testsuite/70150] Additonal test failures with --enable-default-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150 --- Comment #10 from psturm at computervoice dot com --- Yes, exact same errors when built without --enable-default-pie.

[Bug c++/70139] [5/6 Regression] -fno-elide-constructor makes static std::regex to throw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70139 --- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Mar 18 20:16:05 2016 New Revision: 234345 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234345&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/70139 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_call_expression): Fi

[Bug rtl-optimization/70263] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE at -O1 and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (segmentation fault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70263 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/69739] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE during array result, allocatable assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69739 --- Comment #5 from Harald Anlauf --- You probably hit something that's just not yet implemented: trans-expr.c: (gdb) list 4083,4096 4083case GFC_ISYM_LBOUND: 4084case GFC_ISYM_UBOUND: 4085/* TODO These implementatio

[Bug lto/70258] New: -fPIE isn't passed to lto by default when GCC is configured with --enable-default-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70258 Bug ID: 70258 Summary: -fPIE isn't passed to lto by default when GCC is configured with --enable-default-pie Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug preprocessor/70270] New: Spurious line directive with -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70270 Bug ID: 70270 Summary: Spurious line directive with -g Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor

[Bug lto/70283] [6 regression] bogus vtable mismatch warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70283 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70121] [5/6/7 Regression] Spurious warning and crash when returning a reference from lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70121 --- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka --- But as Jason said in comment #4, (IIUC) the test case never compiled correctly in any gcc version. It was marked a regression only because -Wreturn-local-addr now deliberately returns null but arguably that'

[Bug sanitizer/70147] [6 Regression] testcase from hana testsuite gets miscompiled with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70147 --- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek --- Or do you consider this just harmless? If some ctor throws, even if dtor is virtual, the dtor will change _vptr to what it expects before the rest of the dtor body which could call virtual functions etc., a

[Bug tree-optimization/70288] New: ICE with -O1 -fno-tree-dominator-opts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70288 Bug ID: 70288 Summary: ICE with -O1 -fno-tree-dominator-opts Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimi

[Bug tree-optimization/70317] New: [6 Regression] folding x<=x to true for large vectors, ignoring nans

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70317 Bug ID: 70317 Summary: [6 Regression] folding x<=x to true for large vectors, ignoring nans Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

<    1   2   3   4   >