https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69203
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 4 22:53:29 2016
New Revision: 233987
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233987&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69203
* cp-tree.h (COND_EXPR_IS_VEC_DELETE): New.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69203
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67164
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
I've now fixed (for GCC 6) all the bugs that affect Hana except for 47226.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67164
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #8)
> I've now fixed (for GCC 6) all the bugs that affect Hana except for 47226.
That is, that break parts of 'make check'. There's also bug 66543, but that's
just a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66543
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70058
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
The problem does not exist on Linux for sure. Not sure if this is a TDM
distribution problem, a Windows problem, a MingW problem, or gfortran.
I am going to have to get set up on Windows so this may take a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70087
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70058
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #4)
> The problem does not exist on Linux for sure. Not sure if this is a TDM
> distribution problem, a Windows problem, a MingW problem, or gfortran.
>
> I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70087
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66786
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka ---
Author: ppalka
Date: Sat Mar 5 01:59:04 2016
New Revision: 233997
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233997&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/66786 (ICE with nested lambdas in variable template)
gcc/cp/C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66786
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70089
Bug ID: 70089
Summary: ARM/THUMB unnecessarily typecasts some rvalues on
memory store
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70061
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196
--- Comment #21 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Sat Mar 5 05:10:58 2016
New Revision: 233999
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233999&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/69196
* tree-ssa-threadbackward.c (fs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69824
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Sat Mar 5 05:22:01 2016
New Revision: 234000
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234000&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/69824
* c-decl.c (get_parm_info): Don't queue implicit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69941
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69941
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Sat Mar 5 05:30:10 2016
New Revision: 234001
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234001&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/69941
* postreload.c (reload_combine_re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69973
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69973
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Sat Mar 5 05:36:42 2016
New Revision: 234002
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234002&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/69973
* targhooks.c (default_vector_alignment): Limit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196
--- Comment #22 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Thanks for the dumps folks. BRANCH_COST strikes again!
My primary goal was to make sure I hadn't missed something important in how we
calculate the cost of a particular thread path.
BRANCH_COST differenc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196
--- Comment #23 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Sat Mar 5 06:12:09 2016
New Revision: 234003
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234003&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/69196
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr69196-1.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70084
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Mar 5 06:50:23 2016
New Revision: 234004
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234004&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70084
* tree-inline.c (copy_tree_body_r): When canc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70084
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
101 - 123 of 123 matches
Mail list logo