https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70070
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Similar :
$ cat z5.f90
program p
integer :: i
character(2) :: c
data (c(i:i), i=-1,2) /2*'c'/
end
$ gfortran-6 -c z5.f90
Error: DATA statement at (1) has more variables than values
*** Error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70071
Bug ID: 70071
Summary: ICE on wrong usage of a subscript triplet
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70071
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Whereas :
$ cat z3.f90
program p
integer, allocatable :: z(:)[:,:]
allocate (z(1::2)[2,*])
end
$ gfortran-6 -fcoarray=single z3.f90
z3.f90:3:13:
allocate (z(1::2)[2,*])
1
Error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70072
Bug ID: 70072
Summary: ICE in gfc_find_array_ref(): No ref found
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70072
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Whereas with "type" instead of "class" :
$ cat z2.f90
program p
type t
integer :: n
end type
type(t), parameter :: z(2,3) = t(1)
print *, size(z, dim=1)
print *, lbound(z, dim=1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70017
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 3 20:52:40 2016
New Revision: 233944
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233944&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/70017
* gcc.dg/pr70017.c (foo): Store 0 to first e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70067
--- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski ---
Created attachment 37859
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37859&action=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70073
Bug ID: 70073
Summary: -Werror=return-type ignores call to function with
attribute noreturn
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70067
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70067
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70069
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70073
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Summary|-Werror=return-ty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70067
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Creduce came up with the following:
template struct App;
template struct Dyn {
typedef typename Dyn::Acc Acc;
App a;
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196
--- Comment #20 from Dominik Vogt ---
Created attachment 37860
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37860&action=edit
vrp1 dump for s390x (-m64)
vrp1 dump for s390x attached (-m64, give me a shout if you need the -m31 dump).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70064
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70064
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 37861
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37861&action=edit
Failing i?86-linux-gnu assembly
Assembly that fails with gcc -m32 and
$ ld --version
GNU ld version 2.25-15.fc23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Mar 3 22:43:03 2016
New Revision: 233945
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233945&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67364
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_component_reference)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51406
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Mar 3 22:43:09 2016
New Revision: 233946
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233946&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/51406
* typeck.c (build_static_cast_1): Avoid fol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Mar 3 22:45:16 2016
New Revision: 233948
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233948&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67364
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_component_reference)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51406
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Mar 3 22:45:22 2016
New Revision: 233949
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233949&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/51406
* typeck.c (build_static_cast_1): Avoid fol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70064
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #0)
> Created attachment 37854 [details]
> autoreduced testcase
>
> The testcase is likely very fragile due to the set of compiler flags and
> quite big testcase itself.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51570
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.3 |4.8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70019
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59666
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net wrote:
> > ISO C does not allow for arithmetic operations simply not working -
> > producing invalid results - for some types and rounding m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59666
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59666
>
> --- Comment #2 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
> (In reply to Joseph S. Myers fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70058
--- Comment #3 from Paul ---
I am using Windows 10. Find below the output when run from the command prompt
and a backtrace from gdb64.
Thanks,
C:\TDM-GCC-64\bin>a.exe
Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory refe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69941
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |bernds at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69195
--- Comment #13 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 37862
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37862&action=edit
delete bad reg_equiv
A patch like this one that deletes reg_equiv notes that become invalid
according to validate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67164
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 4 01:45:43 2016
New Revision: 233954
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233954&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67164
* pt.c (copy_template_args): New.
(t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70074
Bug ID: 70074
Summary: [C++14] Wrong array write access in constexpr
evaluation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69195
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37862|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59666
--- Comment #5 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #4)
> For a non-IEEE type where the accuracy is specified as within 3ulp
> (depending on the operation in question), there is no definition of what
> hono
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69868
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Mar 4 03:13:30 2016
New Revision: 233957
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233957&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-03-03 Bill Schmidt
PR target/69868 + swap optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70052
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70073
--- Comment #2 from Douglas Bagnall ---
Created attachment 37864
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37864&action=edit
The preprocessed C file
Here is the preprocessed source. It looks like _hx509_abort() has lost its
attributes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70073
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
This sounds more like an issue with samba's source if __attribute__ is being
defined away.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70073
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
You can find out where __attribute__ exactly is being defined by adding -g3 and
then looking at the preprocessed source for the define and trace it back that
way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70075
Bug ID: 70075
Summary: incorrect initialization of multidimensional VLAs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|2007-07-09 07:42:2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69195
--- Comment #15 from Alan Modra ---
Blah, that last patch segfaults all over the place.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70076
Bug ID: 70076
Summary: no exception for excess initializer elements in a
multidimensional VLA
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70073
Douglas Bagnall changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69997
Liu Qiang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70065
--- Comment #6 from Serge Roussak ---
(In reply to Serge Roussak from comment #3)
> (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1)
> > The test "if (warn_precedence)"
> > seems redundant with the use of OPT_Wprecedence.
>
> I see all except this ment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70073
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70064
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, shall we silently disable -mred-zone for -fpic/-fPIE in 32-bit code?
Or error out in that combination?
Or disable it only if we need PIC pointer?
What about other cases where one can have calls in leaf fu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69947
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 4 07:27:15 2016
New Revision: 233958
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233958&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/69947
* dwarf2out.c (prune_unused_types_walk_loc_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69947
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69766
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69766
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Fri Mar 4 07:33:16 2016
New Revision: 233959
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233959&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
S/390: Set GOARCH to the current target when testing multiarch.
The a
101 - 150 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
