https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69291
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69291
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Feb 11 08:11:52 2016
New Revision: 233316
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233316&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-11 Richard Biener
PR rtl-optimization/69291
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69725
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2016-02-09 00:00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69746
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69694
--- Comment #2 from bloerwald at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1)
> g++ 4.9 compiles this successfully, g++ 5.1 doesn't, neither does trunk.
The original testcase as well as the code it was reduced from failed on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69760
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69725
--- Comment #13 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12)
> Confirmed. I suspect it's coverage mismatch errors causing the issue.
No. The file in question changes between stages as shown in comment 10.
PGO of co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69756
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69753
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69747
--- Comment #3 from dhowells at redhat dot com ---
Hmmm... It works with binutils-2.25, so it looks like it may be.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69756
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69747
--- Comment #4 from dhowells at redhat dot com ---
OTOH, looking at the output from gcc, I see:
...
.cfi_sections .debug_frame
.align 2
.global main
.cfi_sections .debug_frame, .c6xabi.exidx
...
binutils-2.25
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59811
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #12)
> So Jan fixed the combine issue when he committed his changes to remove
> statements which set write-only variables. That essentially brought the
> combiner d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69760
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47344
Bug 47344 depends on bug 63577, which changed state.
Bug 63577 Summary: [4.9/5 Regression]: Huge compile time and memory usage with
-O and not -fPIC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69747
--- Comment #5 from dhowells at redhat dot com ---
The consistency check in the binutils source code:
if (cfi_sections_set && cfi_sections != sections)
as_bad (_("inconsistent uses of .cfi_sections"));
is added between 2.25 and 2.26 by co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60736
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 11 09:03:34 2016
New Revision: 233318
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233318&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-11-19 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67770
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 11 09:04:19 2016
New Revision: 233319
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233319&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-11-19 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66432
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 11 09:08:03 2016
New Revision: 233320
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233320&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-11-21 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57580
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 11 09:09:00 2016
New Revision: 233321
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233321&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-12-03 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68680
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 11 09:09:58 2016
New Revision: 233322
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233322&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-12-04 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68376
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 11 09:11:58 2016
New Revision: 233323
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233323&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-12-10 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68670
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 11 09:11:58 2016
New Revision: 233323
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233323&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-12-10 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69713
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Thu Feb 11 09:12:18 2016
New Revision: 233324
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233324&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/69713
* config/sh/sh.md (casesi_worker_0): A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69760
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69015
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 11 09:12:52 2016
New Revision: 233325
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233325&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-01 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68960
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 11 09:13:42 2016
New Revision: 233327
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233327&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-07 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69758
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69713
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Thu Feb 11 09:13:23 2016
New Revision: 233326
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233326&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2016-02-11 Oleg Endo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69128
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 11 09:14:43 2016
New Revision: 233328
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233328&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-08 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69713
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Thu Feb 11 09:15:26 2016
New Revision: 233329
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233329&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2016-02-11 Oleg Endo
)
../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap : (reconfigured)
../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160211 (experimental
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69214
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 11 09:22:21 2016
New Revision: 20
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=20&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-11 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68955
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 11 09:23:06 2016
New Revision: 21
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=21&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-19 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64557
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 11 09:23:06 2016
New Revision: 21
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=21&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-19 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2)
> Yes, the patch is meant to disbale streaming of instrumentation thunks, so
> we do not output two function bodies for one assembler name into LTO files.
> Can we po
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67653
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 11 09:23:58 2016
New Revision: 22
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=22&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-21 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69432
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 11 09:26:31 2016
New Revision: 24
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=24&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-22 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68176
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 11 09:27:07 2016
New Revision: 25
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=25&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-28 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59627
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 11 09:28:23 2016
New Revision: 26
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=26&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-02-08 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69759
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
The manpage says, "On many systems alloca() cannot be used inside the list of
arguments of a function call", so your function bar is not portable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60736
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66432
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67770
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69764
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57580
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68680
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68376
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69713
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69015
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68670
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69128
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68960
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69214
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67653
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69432
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68176
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59627
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64193
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66280
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69764
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65313
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 11 10:08:14 2016
New Revision: 27
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=27&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/65313
* tree-vect-slp.c (vect_schedule_slp_insta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69765
Bug ID: 69765
Summary: [SH] Addidional reg copies when compiling with LRA
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69766
Bug ID: 69766
Summary: go.test/test/env.go fails on biarch
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69757
--- Comment #4 from Edd Barrett ---
Created attachment 37662
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37662&action=edit
Correct config.log
Sorry, here's the right config.log
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.9.3, 5.3.0, 6.0
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59811
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
So SCCVN is limited with --param sccvn-max-alias-queries-per-access which has
a quite high default value (1000). There isn't something more elaborate like
having an overall budget as well.
With lowering t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69757
--- Comment #5 from Edd Barrett ---
I notice that the previous test *did* append -fPIC (and -DPIC). The failing
test does not show its input or compiler invocation, which makes this hard to
debug.
If you look in the libstdc++ configure script, y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69694
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to bloerwald from comment #2)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1)
> > g++ 4.9 compiles this successfully, g++ 5.1 doesn't, neither does trunk.
>
> The original testcase as well as the cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69766
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt ---
If I understand the GOARCH environtment variable right it's value is just the
architecture of the build system. So, this test is bound to fail for any
multiarch target with the non-standard architecture, and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59811
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Note that the wide-int merge brought some extra slowness into
get_ref_base_and_extent which is no longer call free. For example
case BIT_FIELD_REF:
bit_offset += wi::to_offset (TREE_OPER
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69767
Bug ID: 69767
Summary: Clash with macros from sys/sysmacros.h
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69767
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
GCC 5 behaves the same here.
If I use #include the the program won't compile even in C++03.
Not 100 % sure this is a bug though...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69763
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69560#c11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69767
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69758
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Feb 11 11:26:54 2016
New Revision: 28
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=28&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR plugins/69758: add params.list to PLUGIN_HEADERS
gcc/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69758
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273
Hector Oron changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hector.oron at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69766
--- Comment #2 from Dominik Vogt ---
Created attachment 37663
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37663&action=edit
Experimental patch
Is the attached patch the right way to deal with this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Instead of all the workarounds, the mips backend just should be fixed, that is
the only real fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68726
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Feb 11 11:44:51 2016
New Revision: 29
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=29&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2016-02-11 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/68726
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68726
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Feb 11 11:45:10 2016
New Revision: 233340
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233340&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2016-02-11 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/68726
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5 Regression] Wrong code |[5/6 Regression] Wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68726
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69767
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
And we can always fixinclude this...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69767
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I think glibc should simply stop defining those with __cplusplus?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68672
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37657|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67260
--- Comment #17 from Oleg Endo ---
I have tried this:
Index: gcc/config/sh/sh.md
===
--- gcc/config/sh/sh.md (revision 233324)
+++ gcc/config/sh/sh.md (working copy)
@@ -10481,7 +10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69764
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69768
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69768
Bug ID: 69768
Summary: [6 Regression] Bogus -Waddress warning
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69757
--- Comment #6 from Edd Barrett ---
Ah hold on. More information.
If I build a gcc with --disable-bootstrap, the resulting compiler cannot build
an empty C program even:
% /home/vext01/research/warmup_experiment/work/gcc-inst/bin/zgcc /tmp/a.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69768
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
if ((code1 == STRING_CST && !integer_zerop (arg2.value))
|| (code2 == STRING_CST && !integer_zerop (arg1.value)))
warning_at (location, OPT_Waddress,
"comparison w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69768
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273
--- Comment #26 from Hector Oron ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #25)
> Did you try the patch referenced in comment #13 yet?
Not really, as I understood that was not safe. But I'll proceed with testing
that patch which touches gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69769
Bug ID: 69769
Summary: arithmetic operation on pointer to a function
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65251
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo ---
I've just committed a fix for PR 69713, which was a latent issue and GCC 4.9
was affected by it, too. The problem there was a resulting unguarded memory
access which could result in a segfault or bus error.
Adr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534
--- Comment #3 from Pavel Raiskup ---
Issue seen on Fedora 24 too:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306162
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65251
--- Comment #10 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
It builds fine at least on qemu-sh4:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=cpp-netlib&arch=sh4&ver=0.11.2%2Bdfsg1-2&stamp=1451483950
Adrian
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
