[Bug bootstrap/69757] OpenBSD requires -fPIC to build.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69757 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Wrong config.log. I want the one under libstdc++-v3 directory.

[Bug c++/69763] New: _Alignof(double) in C gives different results from alignof(double) in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69763 Bug ID: 69763 Summary: _Alignof(double) in C gives different results from alignof(double) in C++ Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/69694] type incomplete depending if constructing function is templated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69694 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69763] _Alignof(double) in C gives different results from alignof(double) in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69763 Paul Eggert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eggert at gnu dot org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 --- Comment #30 from Bernd Schmidt --- Something like this maybe? I don't know much about the machine and can't say whether the earlyclobber is justified, but looking at my dumps this appears to prevent the problematic peephole from triggering. N

[Bug rtl-optimization/69752] Reload removing instruction with side-effect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69752 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org Assi

[Bug target/69747] c6x cross-compiler fails with "Error: inconsistent uses of .cfi_sections"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69747 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug plugins/69758] [6 Regression] Plugins can't include params.h (missing params.list)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69758 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/69759] __builtin_alloca undocumented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69759 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- So it is. Thanks for the correction. The trouble is that while saying this little may be sufficient for builtins that correspond to functions fully specified elsewhere (e.g., in the C standard) it's inadequa

[Bug ipa/69589] [6 Regression] ICE in initialize_node_lattices, at ipa-cp.c:971

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69589 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug ipa/62051] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Undefined reference to vtable with -O2 and -fdevirtualize-speculatively

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62051 --- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka --- > > The patch simply prohibits references to all COMDAT and EXTERN methods and > > vtables of types with visibility attributes which will prevent optimizing of > > many inlines i.e. in libstdc++. > > Hmm? Th

[Bug lto/68881] [6 Regression] UNRESOLVED/FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/attr-weakref-1 -O2 -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68881 --- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka --- I will implement the optimization soon (with transparent aliases it is finally not too hard to do), but the patch will not be backporable to gcc 5 and for years it was possible to output weakref and its defini

[Bug lto/69630] [6 Regression] LTO ICE in types_same_for_odr at ipa-devirt.c:402

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69630 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- Uhm, a fallout from the patch allowing cxa_pure_virtual in the list of possible targets. Index: ipa-devirt.c === --- ipa-devirt.c(revision

[Bug lto/69491] [6 Regression] [CHKP] gcc.dg/lto/chkp-wrap-asm-name ICEs with -fno-use-linker-plugin (verify_cgraph_node failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69491 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com,

[Bug middle-end/69729] [6 regression] [CHKP] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- Yes, the patch is meant to disbale streaming of instrumentation thunks, so we do not output two function bodies for one assembler name into LTO files. Can we possibly just fix the conditional instead of fully r

[Bug testsuite/69573] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr61053.c (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69573 --- Comment #14 from Chen Gang --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2) > Patch posted for review: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg02372.html For your original patch, my test result is below (only compare 5 result files, be

[Bug rtl-optimization/63577] [4.9/5 Regression]: Huge compile time and memory usage with -O and not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577 --- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I'd agree it's too invasive to backport -- both changes are new optimizations and there may well have been follow-up patches for both. The potential for destabilizing the release branches would seem to out

[Bug target/39723] [4.9/5/6 Regression][cond-optab] worse code with long long shifts on v850

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39723 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/39714] [meta-bug] cond-optab fallout meta-bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39714 Bug 39714 depends on bug 39723, which changed state. Bug 39723 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression][cond-optab] worse code with long long shifts on v850 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39723 What|Removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/56069] [4.9/5/6 Regression] RA pessimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56069 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bonzini at gnu dot org --- Comment #11

[Bug c++/69743] [5/6 Regression] function overload with variadic arguments - template instantiation depth exceeds maximum (gcc4, clang - no problem)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69743 --- Comment #2 from Konstantin Sadov --- I just reproduced that in 4.9.3, but the error is a little different [error] error: no matching function for call to ‘f(int, int&, lots of int&, int&, double&)’ note: candidates are: note: template void f

[Bug testsuite/69573] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr61053.c (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69573 --- Comment #15 from Chen Gang --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #9) > I built the x86_64-apple-darwin15.3.0 cross-compiler to better understand > what the problem is but I don't see it. The cross compiler says the size > and alignment

[Bug middle-end/50971] Only one loop detected when there should be two

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50971 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/35629] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-25.c scan-tree-dump-times profile fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35629 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Summar

[Bug bootstrap/33781] [4.9/5/6 Regression] "Arg list too long" building libgcc.a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33781 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

<    1   2   3