https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69573
--- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor ---
Sorry, the first comment on the assembly should have said -m32, like so:
.long 16<<< _Alignof(long double) with -m32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69752
Bug ID: 69752
Summary: Reload removing instruction with side-effect
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69098
--- Comment #10 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #9)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #6)
> > > This fixes it:
> >
> > Are you going to post it to gcc-patches
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69752
--- Comment #1 from Andre Vieira ---
Tried it with GCC 5.2.1 and 6.0, all show the same behavior. For 4.9 I couldnt
reproduce the issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68503
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69744
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
The issue would be t-openbsd setting USER_H to avoid using GCC's own
headers - thus requiring fixincludes to be set up to fix OpenBSD's own
headers if they are missing required functionalit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54483
Denis Sherstennikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ddsherstennikov at ya dot ru
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69098
--- Comment #11 from Patrick Palka ---
There is another bug lurking here, though. The following test case fails to
compile, even with my proposed patch:
struct A
{
template
static void *pf;
};
template
bool foo () {
return B::template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66992
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59124
--- Comment #34 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
*** Bug 66992 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69468
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:01:40 2016
New Revision: 233283
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233283&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-10 Vladimir Makarov
PR target/69148
* lr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69148
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:01:40 2016
New Revision: 233283
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233283&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-10 Vladimir Makarov
PR target/69148
* lr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69753
Bug ID: 69753
Summary: [6 Regression] bogus: expected primary-expression
before ‘>’ token
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57676
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Vlad, would it make sense to record what insns needed a reload & what insns
were generated for reloads. Then on the next iteration, if the insns needing a
reload are different than the ones needing reloads
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69573
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404
--- Comment #28 from Michael Meissner ---
I agree the 'fix' was a work around. I think the real fix is to make the
addresses into normal addresses but I need some way of marking the address to
say this is ok as a fused address, but not as a norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714
--- Comment #19 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2016-02-09 7:47 PM, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Could you try whether this fixes it and still passes regression tests (esp.
> the
> 67881 testcase)?
There is a warning which cause bui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57580
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:22:19 2016
New Revision: 233284
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233284&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-12-03 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67376
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:24:29 2016
New Revision: 233285
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233285&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-12-22 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69015
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:26:21 2016
New Revision: 233286
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233286&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-01 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69055
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:27:20 2016
New Revision: 233287
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233287&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-01 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68960
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:28:44 2016
New Revision: 233288
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233288&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-07 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69128
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:29:49 2016
New Revision: 233289
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233289&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-08 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66904
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:30:27 2016
New Revision: 233290
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233290&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/66904
cmd/go: fix "#cgo pkg-config:" comments wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69214
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:31:06 2016
New Revision: 233291
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233291&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-11 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68269
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:32:37 2016
New Revision: 233292
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233292&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-14 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68955
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:34:30 2016
New Revision: 233293
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233293&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-19 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404
--- Comment #29 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Mike, this isn't about addresses. It's about an earlyclobber output overlapping
an input. Maybe there's an invalid peephole creating such a pattern, or maybe
the output need not be marked earlyclobber - that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64557
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:34:30 2016
New Revision: 233293
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233293&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-19 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65779
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:36:53 2016
New Revision: 233294
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233294&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-19 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67653
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:38:42 2016
New Revision: 233295
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233295&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-21 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65624
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:40:54 2016
New Revision: 233296
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233296&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-21 Stefan Sørensen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69187
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:40:54 2016
New Revision: 233296
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233296&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-21 Stefan Sørensen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69432
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:41:37 2016
New Revision: 233297
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233297&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-22 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68176
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:43:01 2016
New Revision: 233299
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233299&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-28 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69399
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:42:34 2016
New Revision: 233298
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233298&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-27 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69546
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:44:07 2016
New Revision: 233300
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233300&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-30 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69669
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:44:52 2016
New Revision: 233301
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233301&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-02-04 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37649|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59627
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:46:38 2016
New Revision: 233302
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233302&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-02-08 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66904
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57580
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed also for 5.4+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69015
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed also for 5.4+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69055
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69128
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed also for 5.4+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68960
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed also for 5.4+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68269
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65779
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67653
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] ICE on |[4.9 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69187
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 5.4+/6+ so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69432
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] ICE in |[4.9 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69399
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68176
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] all pch |[4.9 Regression] all pch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69546
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69669
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59627
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 5.4+ too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69214
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] ICE |[4.9 Regression] ICE
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69753
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69753
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69753
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69754
Bug ID: 69754
Summary: --print-{file,prog}-name don't work for
liblto_plugin.so
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69573
--- Comment #12 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #11)
Thanks for the update. That is what I would expect as well. But removing the
"{ target { ! { ia32 } } }" directives without doing anything for targets wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68926
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 10 19:12:32 2016
New Revision: 233304
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233304&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68926
* pt.c (resolve_nondeduced_context): Add com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68926
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 10 19:35:35 2016
New Revision: 233305
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233305&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68926
* pt.c (resolve_nondeduced_context): Add com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68926
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 10 19:36:19 2016
New Revision: 233306
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233306&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68926
* pt.c (resolve_nondeduced_context): Add com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741
Nick changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |critical
--- Comment #2 from Nick ---
Note that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69739
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69573
--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Does the patch let the test pass on x86_64-apple-darwin15,
> both with -m32 and -m64?
Yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69756
Bug ID: 69756
Summary: Passing a multidimensional variable-length array into
a lambda (by reference) causes a segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714
--- Comment #21 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2016-02-10 1:45 PM, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Gah. Try this one instead.
I fixed this up after I sent last mail and restarted build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68926
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68672
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 37657
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37657&action=edit
gcc6-pr68672-wip.patch
WIP patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66368
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68420
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69757
Bug ID: 69757
Summary: OpenBSD requires -fPIC to build.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65134
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68255
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e29253 at jp dot ibm.com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #3 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kelvin
Date: Wed Feb 10 21:19:17 2016
New Revision: 233308
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233308&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
a branch to work on pr 66337
Added:
branches/ibm/kelvin-6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64001
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69757
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you attach the config.log ? It might be that PIE needs to enabled by
default instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61439
Moritz Klammler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||moritz at klammler dot eu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64296
Moritz Klammler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||moritz at klammler dot eu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69758
Bug ID: 69758
Summary: [6 Regression] Plugins can't include params.h (missing
params.list)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61439
--- Comment #5 from Moritz Klammler ---
Created attachment 37659
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37659&action=edit
Improved version of download_prerequisites script that verifies package
checksums
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68726
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64296
--- Comment #6 from Moritz Klammler ---
I'm sorry, the attachment was meant for this other issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61439
I don't know how this could happen but apparently, I hit some wrong button and
posted it to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69759
Bug ID: 69759
Summary: __builtin_alloca undocumented
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69760
Bug ID: 69760
Summary: Wrong 64-bit memory address caused by an unneeded
overflowing 32-bit integer multiplication on x86_64
under -O2 and -O3 code optimization
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69757
--- Comment #2 from Edd Barrett ---
Created attachment 37660
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37660&action=edit
config.log
Attached is the config.log without adjusting CFLAGS and without using
--with-pic.
FWIW, OpenBSD has b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69706
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Reduced testcase:
typedef struct { float r, g, b; } t_rgb;
void write_xpm(void *out, unsigned int flags, const char *title,
const char *legend, const char *label_x, const char *label_y,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69761
Bug ID: 69761
Summary: collect2 cannot find ld when built with in-tree
binutils on Cygwin
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34723
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577
--- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Thanks for tracking this down Jeff.
This seems too invasive to backport to the release branches, or is this
compile-time regression considered important enough for that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69759
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
It is documented, just not the way you think it is:
See https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Other-Builtins.html:
Outside strict ISO C mode (-ansi, -std=c90, -std=c99 or -std=c11), the
functions _exit, +++alloc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69762
Bug ID: 69762
Summary: Locales are not fully supported on
x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69760
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69762
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
IIRC locales need some libc support and the hookup for libstdc++ to libc uses
some glibc extensions due to needing threaded support.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69739
--- Comment #2 from John ---
After reporting the bug, I noticed that in the actual code I have (not the
reduced version I posted before), adding the (:) stride doesn't always make the
ICE go away.
What solved the problem once and for all (and wi
101 - 200 of 225 matches
Mail list logo