[Bug tree-optimization/69719] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69719 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Feb 10 08:36:03 2016 New Revision: 233262 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233262&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-02-10 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/69719

[Bug fortran/69741] New: forall array scalar loop counters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741 Bug ID: 69741 Summary: forall array scalar loop counters Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug rtl-optimization/69737] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64682.c -O2 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69737 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/69736] [4.9/5/6 Regression] "error: too few arguments to function" in c++14 but not c++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69736 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69735] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in harmful_loop_in_region, at graphite-scop-detection.c:1045

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69735 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug bootstrap/69725] LTO/PGO bootstrap fails with in-tree gmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69725 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- At least it's very slow doing the configure checks and I see it LTOs gmp all the time (configuring mpfr). Just trying regular LTO bootstrap right now btw, w/o profile-feedback.

[Bug fortran/69742] New: ICE with -O3 and ASSOCIATE containing repeated expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742 Bug ID: 69742 Summary: ICE with -O3 and ASSOCIATE containing repeated expression Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug tree-optimization/69291] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1 for ruby-2.3.0/regcomp.c:985:compile_length_quantifier_node()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69291 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/69742] ICE with -O3 and ASSOCIATE containing repeated expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/69742] ICE with -O3 and ASSOCIATE containing repeated expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742 --- Comment #2 from mrestelli --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #1) > What happens if you run it with > > gfortran -ffrontend-optimize Same ICE > and with > > gfortran -O3 -fno-frontend-optimize ? Works correctly

[Bug bootstrap/59878] [4.9 Regression] ISL from cloog does not work with trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59878 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/69743] New: function overload - template instantiation depth exceeds maximum (gcc4, clang - no problem)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69743 Bug ID: 69743 Summary: function overload - template instantiation depth exceeds maximum (gcc4, clang - no problem) Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/69291] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1 for ruby-2.3.0/regcomp.c:985:compile_length_quantifier_node()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69291 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Ok, not inlining compile_length_quantifier_node fixes it as well. It's inlined in compile_length_tree. -fdisable-tree-uncprop1 fixes it - that hints more at a target specific RTL issue or an RTL expansion

[Bug libstdc++/69116] [4.9/5 Regression] compile error when including valarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69116 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Feb 10 11:10:58 2016 New Revision: 233263 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233263&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Constrain std::valarray functions and operators PR libstdc++/691

[Bug fortran/69742] ICE with -O3 and ASSOCIATE containing repeated expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69735] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in harmful_loop_in_region, at graphite-scop-detection.c:1045

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69735 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug c++/69743] [5/6 Regression] function overload with variadic arguments - template instantiation depth exceeds maximum (gcc4, clang - no problem)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69743 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/69116] [4.9/5 Regression] compile error when including valarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69116 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Feb 10 11:25:33 2016 New Revision: 233265 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233265&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Constrain std::valarray functions and operators PR libstdc++/69

[Bug libstdc++/69116] [4.9/5 Regression] compile error when including valarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69116 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/67451] [5/6 Regression] [F08] ICE with sourced allocation from coarray.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67451 --- Comment #11 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-02/msg00033.html Waiting for review and approval of bugreporters whether the patch fixes the issue or not.

[Bug bootstrap/59878] [4.9 Regression] ISL from cloog does not work with trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59878 --- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to vries from comment #9) By comparing cloog sources with isl tags I got: > cloog-0.16.0: isl-0.05 > cloog-0.16.1: isl-0.05.1 > cloog-0.16.2: isl-0.06 > cloog-0.16.3: isl-0.07 > cloog-0

[Bug rtl-optimization/69710] performance issue with SP Linpack with Autovectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69710 --- Comment #8 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Reproduced on arm with saxpy.c. The dump for slp is as below: : _82 = prologue_after_cost_adjust.7_43 * 4; vectp_dy.13_81 = dy_9(D) + _82; _87 = prologue_after_cost_adjust.7_43 * 4; vect

[Bug c++/69098] [6 regression] Member function pointer template flagged with 'is not a function template'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69098 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #6) > This fixes it: Are you going to post it to gcc-patches (with ChangeLog and testcase)?

[Bug rtl-optimization/69710] performance issue with SP Linpack with Autovectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69710 --- Comment #9 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Also the problem exists only for arm because it doesn't support [base+index] addressing mode for vect load/store. I guess mips doesn't either.

[Bug c++/69098] [5/6 regression] Member function pointer template flagged with 'is not a function template'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69098 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 Target Milestone|6.0

[Bug target/68973] [6 regression] Internal compiler error on power for gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67211.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68973 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #14 fro

[Bug tree-optimization/69291] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1 for ruby-2.3.0/regcomp.c:985:compile_length_quantifier_node()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69291 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 37651 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37651&action=edit preprocessed source Build with -m32 -mtune=generic -march=i586 -O [-fPIC] -fdisable-rtl-ce2 (if-conversion af

[Bug rtl-optimization/69291] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1 for ruby-2.3.0/regcomp.c:985:compile_length_quantifier_node()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69291 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- It combines (insn 353 352 354 63 (set (reg:CCZ 17 flags) (compare:CCZ (mem/f:SI (plus:SI (reg/v/f:SI 225 [ node ]) (const_int 32 [0x20])) [10 MEM[(struct QtfrNode *)node_14(D)].n

[Bug fortran/67451] [5/6 Regression] [F08] ICE with sourced allocation from coarray.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67451 --- Comment #12 from Dominik Vogt --- The patch works on s390x.

[Bug fortran/69742] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE with -O3 and ASSOCIATE containing repeated expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug rtl-optimization/69291] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1 for ruby-2.3.0/regcomp.c:985:compile_length_quantifier_node()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69291 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- #0 noce_emit_store_flag (if_info=0x7fffd7d0, x=0x75ade840, reversep=1, normalize=0) at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk3/gcc/ifcvt.c:839 #1 0x017adfa3 in noce_try_store_flag_constants (

[Bug rtl-optimization/69291] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1 for ruby-2.3.0/regcomp.c:985:compile_length_quantifier_node()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69291 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Ah, of course /* If we have x := test ? x + 3 : x + 4 then move the original x out of the way while we store flags. */ if (common && reg_mentioned_p (if_info->x, common)) {

[Bug rtl-optimization/69291] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1 for ruby-2.3.0/regcomp.c:985:compile_length_quantifier_node()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69291 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Testing Index: gcc/ifcvt.c === --- gcc/ifcvt.c (revision 233262) +++ gcc/ifcvt.c (working copy) @@ -1381,10 +1381,11 @@ noce_try_store_flag_c

[Bug rtl-optimization/69291] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1 for ruby-2.3.0/regcomp.c:985:compile_length_quantifier_node()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69291 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/69291] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1 for ruby-2.3.0/regcomp.c:985:compile_length_quantifier_node()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69291 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Caused by r226869.

[Bug ipa/68672] [4.9/5/6 Regression] g++.dg/torture/pr68470.C: ICE: cannot update SSA form: statement uses released SSA name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68672 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/69726] [6 Regression] Bogus warnings with -O3 -Wuninitialized because dead code after if-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69726 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Feb 10 12:46:33 2016 New Revision: 233267 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233267&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-02-10 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/69726

[Bug tree-optimization/69726] [6 Regression] Bogus warnings with -O3 -Wuninitialized because dead code after if-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69726 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68973] [6 regression] Internal compiler error on power for gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67211.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68973 --- Comment #15 from David Edelsohn --- Improving find_reloads_address_1 seems the better path. auto_inc_dec is beneficial in recent Power processors.

[Bug rtl-optimization/69609] block reordering consumes an inordinate amount of time, REE consumes much memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69609 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- So checking enabled trunk with -O2 -fno-checking results in PRE : 25.58 ( 7%) usr 0.53 (33%) sys 26.14 ( 7%) wall 793 kB ( 0%) ggc reorder blocks : 286.65 (80%) usr

[Bug rtl-optimization/69609] block reordering consumes an inordinate amount of time, REE consumes much memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69609 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Maybe sth as simple as Index: gcc/bb-reorder.c === --- gcc/bb-reorder.c(revision 233262) +++ gcc/bb-reorder.c(working copy) @@ -889,6

[Bug fortran/69742] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE with -O3 and ASSOCIATE containing repeated expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/69702] [4.9/5/6 Regression] excessive stack usage with -fprofile-arcs, LIM store motion lacks a register pressure aware cost model

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69702 --- Comment #2 from Arnd Bergmann --- Thanks, I have now added -fno-tree-loop-im to the kernel gcov cflags, so files we profile will be built with that. I can confirm that it fixes all stack size warnings that show up with -fprofile-arcs, I found

[Bug tree-optimization/69702] [4.9/5/6 Regression] excessive stack usage with -fprofile-arcs, LIM store motion lacks a register pressure aware cost model

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69702 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, arnd at linaro dot org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69702 > > --- Comment #2 from Arnd Bergmann --- > Thanks, I have now added -fno-tree-loop-im to

[Bug c++/62134] [C++11] ICE with template alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62134 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- FWIW probably a dup of PR 61198 and so fixed by r218955

[Bug tree-optimization/68021] [6 Regression] ice in rewrite_use_nonlinear_expr with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68021 --- Comment #16 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Wed Feb 10 14:09:05 2016 New Revision: 233269 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233269&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/68021 * tree-ssa-loop-ivo

[Bug tree-optimization/68021] [6 Regression] ice in rewrite_use_nonlinear_expr with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68021 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/69744] New: OpenBSD does not define max_align_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69744 Bug ID: 69744 Summary: OpenBSD does not define max_align_t Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug target/68273] [5 Regression] Wrong code on mips/mipsel due to (invalid?) peeking at alignments in function_arg.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273 --- Comment #22 from Richard Biener --- If -fno-ipa-sra helps can you try Index: gcc/tree-sra.c === --- gcc/tree-sra.c (revision 233268) +++ gcc/tree-sra.c (working copy)

[Bug libstdc++/69744] OpenBSD does not define max_align_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69744 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69687] Buffer Overflow in libiberty

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69687 Marcel Böhme changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major --- Comment #8 from Marcel Böhme -

[Bug libstdc++/69744] OpenBSD does not define max_align_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69744 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- stddef.h is provided by GCC itself and thus likely needs "fixing" for OpenBSD (see gcc/ginclude/stddef.h)

[Bug pch/69745] New: Too big precompiled headers seem to result in a silent compilation failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69745 Bug ID: 69745 Summary: Too big precompiled headers seem to result in a silent compilation failure Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug fortran/67451] [5/6 Regression] [F08] ICE with sourced allocation from coarray.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67451 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The patch fixes the two issues I saw on x86_64-apple-darwin15 (comment 10 and an ICE when compiling the test with -fcoarray=lib).

[Bug c++/69687] Buffer Overflow in libiberty

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69687 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal

[Bug fortran/69742] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE with -O3 and ASSOCIATE containing repeated expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known to w

[Bug go/67180] Gccgo does not support MIPS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67180 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/69746] New: [6 Regression] diagnostic about non-constant expression not helpful

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69746 Bug ID: 69746 Summary: [6 Regression] diagnostic about non-constant expression not helpful Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic

[Bug c++/69649] [6 Regression] ICE in assign_temp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69649 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 10 15:06:20 2016 New Revision: 233271 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233271&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/69241 PR c++/69649 * gimplify.c (gimplify_m

[Bug c/69746] [6 Regression] diagnostic about non-constant expression not helpful

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69746 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug ipa/69241] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 10 15:06:20 2016 New Revision: 233271 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233271&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/69241 PR c++/69649 * gimplify.c (gimplify_

[Bug ipa/69241] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/69241] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug go/68562] morestack misaligns stack on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68562 --- Comment #10 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Wed Feb 10 15:14:05 2016 New Revision: 233273 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233273&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR go/68562 * config/i386/morestack.S (__stack_spl

[Bug go/68562] morestack misaligns stack on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68562 --- Comment #11 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Wed Feb 10 15:14:24 2016 New Revision: 233274 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233274&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR go/68562 * config/i386/morestack.S (__stack_spl

[Bug go/68562] morestack misaligns stack on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68562 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69747] New: c6x cross-compiler fails with "Error: inconsistent uses of .cfi_sections"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69747 Bug ID: 69747 Summary: c6x cross-compiler fails with "Error: inconsistent uses of .cfi_sections" Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/69744] OpenBSD does not define max_align_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69744 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > stddef.h is provided by GCC itself and thus likely needs "fixing" for OpenBSD > (see gcc/ginclude/stddef.h) Yeah, for some reason that header isn't used for t

[Bug c++/69748] New: SIGSEGV received on vmovdqa instruction during avx-vectorized array initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69748 Bug ID: 69748 Summary: SIGSEGV received on vmovdqa instruction during avx-vectorized array initialization Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug c++/69748] SIGSEGV received on vmovdqa instruction during avx-vectorized array initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69748 --- Comment #1 from Vladyslav Buslov --- Created attachment 37653 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37653&action=edit temp ii file for example program

[Bug tree-optimization/69652] [6 Regression] [ICE] verify_ssa fail w/ -O2 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69652 --- Comment #8 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Wed Feb 10 15:22:17 2016 New Revision: 233275 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233275&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ 2016-02-10 Yuri Rumyantsev PR tree-optimization/6965

[Bug target/69748] SIGSEGV received on vmovdqa instruction during avx-vectorized array initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69748 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Status|UNCO

[Bug tree-optimization/69652] [6 Regression] [ICE] verify_ssa fail w/ -O2 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69652 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/10200] [6 Regression] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/68973] [6 regression] Internal compiler error on power for gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67211.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68973 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/69747] c6x cross-compiler fails with "Error: inconsistent uses of .cfi_sections"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69747 --- Comment #1 from dhowells at redhat dot com --- This gcc also fails: %global DATE 20160205 %global SVNREV 233185 %global gcc_version 6.0.0

[Bug c++/20679] [3.4 Regression] Parse error when accessing attributes of an inner class. Enclosing class is template and have methods with the same name.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20679 Bug 20679 depends on bug 10200, which changed state. Bug 10200 Summary: [6 Regression] Weird clash with same names in different scopes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/10200] [6 Regression] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/12944] [meta-bug] C++ name-lookup problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12944 Bug 12944 depends on bug 10200, which changed state. Bug 10200 Summary: [6 Regression] Weird clash with same names in different scopes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/10200] [6 Regression] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69657] [6 Regression] abs() not inlined after including math.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657 --- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Feb 10 15:34:59 2016 New Revision: 233278 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233278&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/69657 * name-lookup.c (ambiguous_decl): Call remo

[Bug target/69748] SIGSEGV received on vmovdqa instruction during avx-vectorized array initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69748 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69749] New: Use aligned spill/fill for vector register in interrupt handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69749 Bug ID: 69749 Summary: Use aligned spill/fill for vector register in interrupt handler Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/69750] New: ICE in sh64 targetted gcc-6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69750 Bug ID: 69750 Summary: ICE in sh64 targetted gcc-6 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assign

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug ipa/69241] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241 --- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek --- The #c1 testcase doesn't bother to return a value from the function, does Chromium has similar garbage in it?

[Bug testsuite/69573] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr61053.c (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69573 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Chen Gang from comment #7) > Can we check __APPLE_CC__ instead of __SIZEOF_LONG_DOUBLE__ ? Thanks for testing the patch! It sounds like on this target, even though sizeof(long double) is 16, its

[Bug target/69748] SIGSEGV received on vmovdqa instruction during avx-vectorized array initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69748 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pin

[Bug c++/15795] No way to teach operator new anything about alignment requirements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15795 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vladyslav.buslov@harmonicin

[Bug libstdc++/69751] error: call of overloaded 'abs(size_t)' is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69751 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/69751] New: error: call of overloaded 'abs(size_t)' is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69751 Bug ID: 69751 Summary: error: call of overloaded 'abs(size_t)' is ambiguous Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug ipa/69241] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241 --- Comment #25 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #24) > The #c1 testcase doesn't bother to return a value from the function, does > Chromium has similar garbage in it? Actually, the chromium file, from which t

[Bug target/69750] ICE in sh64 targetted gcc-6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69750 --- Comment #1 from dhowells at redhat dot com --- Doing gdb ./gcc/cc1 and running it with: r -quiet foo.c -g -fexceptions -o /tmp/cc5gm5ki.s shows the failure as: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. _IO_vfprintf_internal

[Bug libstdc++/69751] error: call of overloaded 'abs(size_t)' is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69751 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to mgans...@alice.de from comment #0) > series.c:90:99: error: call of overloaded 'abs(size_t)' is ambiguous > if (::abs(strlen(evtCompShortText) - > strlen(episodeDb->getStrValue(

[Bug rtl-optimization/59811] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Huge increase in memory usage and compile time in combine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59811 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #12 f

[Bug ipa/69241] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 37654 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37654&action=edit gcc6-pr69241.patch Well, we shouldn't ICE even on questionable testcases where -Wreturn-type complains on them

[Bug target/69671] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vpmovqb-1.c scan-assembler-times vpmovqb[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+[^\n]*%xmm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}{z}(?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69671 --- Comment #13 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > But something like that might remove the flexibility from the register > allocator. > > Wonder why the RA in this case doesn't see that the value loaded into

[Bug c++/69098] [5/6 regression] Member function pointer template flagged with 'is not a function template'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69098 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug libstdc++/69751] error: call of overloaded 'abs(size_t)' is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69751 --- Comment #3 from mgansser at alice dot de --- many thanks for supporting me, problem was solved.

[Bug testsuite/69573] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr61053.c (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69573 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- I built the x86_64-apple-darwin15.3.0 cross-compiler to better understand what the problem is but I don't see it. The cross compiler says the size and alignment of long double is 16 in both ILP32 (with -m32)

  1   2   3   >