https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69649
Bug ID: 69649
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in assign_temp
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69649
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69649
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241
--- Comment #14 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
*** Bug 69649 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69649
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69649
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Well, comment 9 of 69241 is an exact dup.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69647
--- Comment #2 from Pieter Cardoen ---
I am using binutils 2.24.
Best regards
Pieter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 69649 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69649
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714
--- Comment #11 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Kyrill,
> For this failure (among others) I proposed the series at:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg01713.html
Ah - much better! I have approved the parts of your series that I can, In f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714
--- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #11)
> Hi Kyrill,
>
> > For this failure (among others) I proposed the series at:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg01713.html
>
> Ah - m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69641
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Sedach ---
Thanks. Better to use "unsigned int" than options:
0 > (int)((unsigned int)i + 0x0080)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69599
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 37564
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37564&action=edit
tentative patch
Fixes the two failures, while still passing vect/pr46032.c.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650
Bug ID: 69650
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in linemap_line_start, at
libcpp/line-map.c:803
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69631
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69118
Kirill Yukhin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69120
--- Comment #1 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Will fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69268
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69651
Bug ID: 69651
Summary: Usage of unitialized pointer io/list_read.c
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69651
--- Comment #1 from Kirill Yukhin ---
File is: libgfortran/io/list_read.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69613
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67451
--- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Wed Feb 3 09:44:18 2016
New Revision: 233099
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233099&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-02-03 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69418
--- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Wed Feb 3 09:44:18 2016
New Revision: 233099
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233099&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-02-03 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 37565
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37565&action=edit
gcc6-pr69241.patch
So, it seems we have at least 3 different issues, the attached patch fixes two
of them, the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69120
--- Comment #2 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Looked closely.
The name was chosen intentionally to simplify "sse2_shufpd"
expand. If we want to fix this name - new subst attribute need to be introduced
and
if ()
emit_insn (avx512vl_...
else
emit_in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69599
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On February 3, 2016 10:01:45 AM GMT+01:00, "vries at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69599
>
>--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
>Created attach
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69597
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69599
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 69597 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241
--- Comment #17 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16)
> Created attachment 37565 [details]
> gcc6-pr69241.patch
>
> So, it seems we have at least 3 different issues, the attached patch fixes
> two of them, the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241
--- Comment #18 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Here is Jakub's testcase. It it shorter and nicer than that from comment1.
struct A { virtual void m1 (); };
struct C : A { void m1 () { m1 (); } };
template struct B
{
T *t;
B (T *x) : t (x) { i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69599
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4)
> Looks good but I'm not sure if you should ask for in other partition for
> builtins.
We ask for in_other_partition for parallelized fns (indirectly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69418
--- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Wed Feb 3 10:39:09 2016
New Revision: 233101
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233101&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-02-03 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67451
--- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Wed Feb 3 10:39:09 2016
New Revision: 233101
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233101&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-02-03 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69423
--- Comment #4 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi Paul,
I will have a look at it today. May be a fresh pair of eyes can be of help.
- Andre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67451
--- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Commited fix; waiting one week for error reports before closing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69423
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to vehre from comment #4)
> Hi Paul,
>
> I will have a look at it today. May be a fresh pair of eyes can be of help.
>
> - Andre
Thanks. I haven't given it much attention yet. I diverted into recur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69648
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Created attachment 37566
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37566&action=edit
output assembly (intel syntax)
The failing instructions are around line 156:
mov eax, DWORD PTR 60[e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66330
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #17)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16)
> > Created attachment 37565 [details]
> > gcc6-pr69241.patch
> >
> > So, it seems we have at least 3 differ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59627
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, as for whether versioning supports changing return type to void, clearly it
supports it and even fnsplit uses it for the !split_part_return_p.
So perhaps:
--- ipa-split.c.jj1 2016-01-04 14:55:52.00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59627
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 37567
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37567&action=edit
ten
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69648
--- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka ---
If I understand the .reload dump correctly, r87 is not live in insn 289, but it
should be:
...
289: r416:SI=r87:SI+const(unspec[`*.LC9'] 1)
REG_EQUAL `*.LC9'
Creating newreg=417 from oldreg=87,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69369
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2)
> I will take a look. It works in my tree with changes to avoid use of
> IDENTIFIER_TRANSPARENT_ALIAS.
r232560 doesn't seem to fix any known problem in trunk. Can w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69628
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69120
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Can you add a comment and resolve it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69648
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69652
Bug ID: 69652
Summary: [6 Regression] [ICE] verify_ssa fail w/ -O2
-ffast-math -ftree-vectorize
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69627
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69647
--- Comment #3 from Pieter Cardoen ---
Created attachment 37571
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37571&action=edit
console printout
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69631
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69613
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69120
Kirill Yukhin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59627
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 69594 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69594
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69118
--- Comment #2 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Wed Feb 3 13:44:50 2016
New Revision: 233103
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233103&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/69118
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md (define_insn "avx512f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69118
--- Comment #3 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Wed Feb 3 13:48:27 2016
New Revision: 233104
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233104&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/69118.
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md (define_insn "avx512
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69118
Kirill Yukhin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69653
Bug ID: 69653
Summary: More CSE opportunities in address expressions
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69648
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #3)
> It's not crashing for me, but I think I agree there's a problem. Will
> investigate a bit.
Looks like PIC register is not initialized properly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69653
--- Comment #1 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Since tree optimizer cannot handle cse opportunities as described here, backend
needs to force register scaling expr (instead of loop invariant part address
expression) out of memory reference, hopi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69648
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Yeah, my current theory is that r87 is spilled at the start, then the spill reg
is inherited in all the existing uses of it, and lra thinks it can avoid
storing it to memory.
Then we add a new reference to i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69625
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt ---
It's a bug in the S/390 backend that sometimes trashes r6 in vararg functions.
We're working on a fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69648
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69634
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69654
Bug ID: 69654
Summary: ICE in gfc_trans_structure_assign
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69652
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69655
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69655
Bug ID: 69655
Summary: libgomp lto failures: segfault in
cgraph_node::mark_force_output
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69655
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69423
--- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
What I have learnt so far:
When the gimple optimisation algorithm 'remove_unused_locals ()' in
gcc/tree-ssa-live.c is done, it has removed the temporary for the
_gfortran_transfer_character_write's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69656
Bug ID: 69656
Summary: -fsanitize=undefined compile time hog
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69652
--- Comment #2 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
This is my fault - forgot to fix vuse for scalar statements which are crossed
by masked stores during code motion. Fix is testing and will be sent for review
tomorrow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69652
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jakub at redhat dot com|
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jeline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69656
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
# Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
4.48% cc1plus cc1plus[.] bitmap_set_bit
2.34% cc1plus cc1plus[.] bitmap_clear_bit
1.48% cc1plus cc1plus[.] record_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
--- Comment #21 from Alexander Fomin ---
I'm sorry for a late response.
When applying this patch over r233079, I can't see any bootstrap issues on AIX
machine except some missing symbols from libintl.
Adding --disable-nls to options provided by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
--- Comment #22 from David Edelsohn ---
We can try it again or I can try an additional bootstrap test with your patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69461
--- Comment #13 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Feb 3 17:58:34 2016
New Revision: 233107
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233107&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-03 Vladimir Makarov
Alexandre Oliva
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
--- Comment #23 from Alexander Fomin ---
Created attachment 37574
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37574&action=edit
Original patch
It would be great, thank you.
Here is the original patch I've evaluated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69461
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69461
--- Comment #15 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #12)
> Vlad, thanks for taking this over. Let me just point out, just in case you
> missed, that I believe it is important for any register allocator to test
> H
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
Bug ID: 69657
Summary: [6 Regression] abs() not inlined after including
math.h
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69619
--- Comment #5 from Wilco ---
Proposed patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg00206.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368
--- Comment #10 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The stores are getting optimized out because equal_mem_array_ref_p considers
equal pairs of MEM_REFS like
fmcom.x[_168] and fmcom.x[_208]
That is, a ARRAY_REF whose first operand is a COMPONEN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69423
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to vehre from comment #6)
> What I have learnt so far:
>
> When the gimple optimisation algorithm 'remove_unused_locals ()' in
> gcc/tree-ssa-live.c is done, it has removed the temporary for the
> _g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69636
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
To begin with a short example, namely function_kinds_3.f90.
Placing statement "private" explicit in source, reducing a bit,
then compiling without "-fmodule-private" :
$ cat z1.f90
module m
private
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69658
Bug ID: 69658
Summary: [6 Regression] Bogus "C99 designator outside aggregate
initializer" error
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69659
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
List of affected files :
actual_array_offset_1.f90
allocate_class_3.f90
allocate_with_source_16.f90
allocate_with_source_8.f08
class_array_11.f03
class_array_20.f03
class_array_21.f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69659
Bug ID: 69659
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE on using option -frepack-arrays, in
gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69658
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, rejects-valid
Target Miles
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69658
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Bet we shouldn't use get_ref_base_and_extent comparisons if there is a variable
ARRAY_REF index and the corresponding array is flexible array member or poor
man's flexible array member.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Otherwise, we happily consider in
struct S { char a[1]; int b; char c[1]; };
void
foo (struct S *p, int i, int j)
{
p->c[i]
...
p->c[j]
}
the above two as equivalent, while we should only consider thos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69056
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
Author: ppalka
Date: Wed Feb 3 20:14:43 2016
New Revision: 233108
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233108&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/69056 (argument pack deduction failure during overload resolut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69056
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69607
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
With:
- the tentative fix for PR69599
- the tentative fix for PR59627
- the undo of r232384 patch that caused PR69655
this still reproduces. Apparently this is an independent issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69655
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
In addition, these also fail (hiding PR69607, which is triggered in the same
test-cases when undoing r232384):
...
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-fortran/atomic_capture-1.f90 -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_nvidia=1
-DACC_ME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53440
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69660
Bug ID: 69660
Summary: Microblaze break_handler and symbol
`_interrupt_handler' is already defined
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: min
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
