[Bug fortran/69520] Implement reversal of -fcheck options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69520 --- Comment #1 from Harald Anlauf --- The patch in comment #0 regtests ok on i686-pc-linux-gnu. Possible ChangeLog entry: 2016-01-27 ... PR fortran/69520 * options.c: Enhance -fcheck by reversal of specifications. * in

[Bug target/5372] [powerpc-*-eabi] -mno-eabi not working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5372 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- The PowerPC EABI document itself does not say anything about __eabi or process startup (it even says there are no requirements).

[Bug target/68662] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090210 c_lto_20090210_0.o-c_lto_20090210_1.o link, -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68662 --- Comment #10 from Alan Modra --- I guess rs6000 needs to implement targetm.override_options_after_change() if we're to keep flag_pic and TARGET_RELOCATABLE consistent.

[Bug middle-end/17958] expand_divmod fails to optimize division of 64-bit quantity by small constant when BITS_PER_WORD is 32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17958 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2007-07-02 21:30:35 |2016-1-27 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/68659] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-pr45230-1.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-*-*, arm*-*-* |powerpc-*-*, arm*-*-*, |

[Bug tree-optimization/68659] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-pr45230-1.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659 --- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #12) > At revision 232901, this testcase still ICEs on i686 (or x86_64 with -m32) > on Fedora 23: > > Running target unix/-m32 > FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-pr45230-1.c (int

[Bug target/18154] Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18154 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-*-* |powerpc*-*-* Status|NEW

[Bug target/18900] Don't use fp regs for mem moves without explicit use of fp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18900 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug fortran/69497] ICE in gfc_free_namespace, at fortran/symbol.c:3701

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69497 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/69520] Implement reversal of -fcheck options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69520 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org A

[Bug c++/69521] -Wdeprecated-declarations errors in unused inline methods

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69521 Loïc Yhuel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||loic.yhuel at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug target/18900] Don't use fp regs for mem moves without explicit use of fp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18900 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/24208] C++ front-end can still be sped up

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24208 --- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Thu Jan 28 01:06:29 2016 New Revision: 232912 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232912&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Low-hanging C++-lexer speedup (PR c++/24208) gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

[Bug rtl-optimization/19705] -fno-branch-count-reg doesn't prevent decrement and branch instructions on a count register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19705 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2006-03-05 03:12:14 |2016-1-27 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/69522] New: gcc hangs on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu

per Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160127 (experimental) [trunk revision 232874] (GCC) $ time gcc-trunk abc1.c ^C real21m50

[Bug target/19746] printf() optimisation ignores longcall attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19746 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-05-09 01:18:53 |2016-1-27 CC|

[Bug c++/69523] New: -Wliteral-suffix should not warn within namespace std

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69523 Bug ID: 69523 Summary: -Wliteral-suffix should not warn within namespace std Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c++/69523] -Wliteral-suffix should not warn within namespace std

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69523 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- How about declaring those headers as system headers by using -isystem instead of using -I :)?

[Bug c++/69523] -Wliteral-suffix should not warn within namespace std

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69523 --- Comment #2 from Eric Fiselier --- @Andrew I'm a libc++ developer and I really like using compiler warnings when developing and testing libc++. Using -isystem prevents this entirely. Normally they are system headers but this is explicitly turn

[Bug debug/21913] REG_EXPR wrong for parameters passed by invisible reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21913 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/22226] vectorization library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug target/22271] No builtin preprocessing defines to tell SDATA mode.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22271 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug target/23450] local functions should not sign extend results (and arguments) for speed reasons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23450 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2007-07-01 00:47:09 |2016-1-27 CC|

[Bug target/23450] local functions should not sign extend results (and arguments) for speed reasons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23450 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||carrot at google dot com --- Comment #4 f

[Bug target/65010] ppc backend generates unnecessary signed extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65010 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Last reconfirmed|2015-03-21 00

[Bug target/65010] ppc backend generates unnecessary signed extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65010 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug tree-optimization/22226] vectorization library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn

[Bug target/65010] ppc backend generates unnecessary signed extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65010 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #6) > This is not the same. There is a difference between sign extension of > arguments and sign extensions within a function. This bug points out that values returne

[Bug target/69461] [6 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69461 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva --- Created attachment 37498 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37498&action=edit Patch I'm testing to fix the bug LRA wants harder than reload to avoid creating a stack slot to satisfy insn

[Bug target/18154] Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18154 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug fortran/60526] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Accepts-invalid: Variable name same as type name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60526 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37495|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/60526] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Accepts-invalid: Variable name same as type name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60526 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37499|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/69524] New: [ICE] [F2008] Compiler segfaults on simple testcase @ -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69524 Bug ID: 69524 Summary: [ICE] [F2008] Compiler segfaults on simple testcase @ -O0 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

<    1   2   3