[Bug c++/69317] [6 regression] wrong ABI version in -Wabi warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69317 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66487] [6 Regression] Firefox segfault with LTO enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #13) > Author: hubicka > Date: Wed Jan 13 23:47:45 2016 > New Revision: 232356 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232356&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > > PR ip

[Bug middle-end/68542] [6 Regression] 10% 481.wrf performance regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68542 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/49627] NINT(x,16) doesn't work (at all, ever, I don't think)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49627 dr.robert.kosik at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dr.robert.kosik at gmai

[Bug middle-end/65686] [5/6 regression] inconsistent warning maybe-uninitialized: warn about 'unsigned', not warn about 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65686 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug rtl-optimization/69447] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-schedule-insns and mixed 8/16/32/64bit arithmetics @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69447 --- Comment #12 from Richard Henderson --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #10) > This patch also seems to fix the wrong code in PR 69124 Good to know -- I wasn't able to reproduce that failure myself.

[Bug testsuite/69488] tests in gnat/sso give a lot of spurious failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69488 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Emrich --- I tested the new version of the proposed patch. Now the tests all pass on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and x86_64-w64-mingw32. Eric, please submit to mainline.

[Bug middle-end/68542] [6 Regression] 10% 481.wrf performance regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68542 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On January 27, 2016 5:03:18 PM GMT+01:00, "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68542 > >Marek Polacek changed: > > What|Removed

[Bug c++/69509] infinite loop compiling a VLA in a recursive constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69509 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69516] [5/6 regression] infinite recursion on a VLA with excess initializer elements in constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69516 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69516] New: [5/6 regression] infinite recursion on a VLA with excess initializer elements in constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69516 Bug ID: 69516 Summary: [5/6 regression] infinite recursion on a VLA with excess initializer elements in constexpr function Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/69488] tests in gnat/sso give a lot of spurious failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69488 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug rtl-optimization/69447] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-schedule-insns and mixed 8/16/32/64bit arithmetics @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69447 --- Comment #13 from Richard Henderson --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11) > Without knowing the lra-remat code at all, I just wonder if subreg_regs > needs to be one per the whole function, rather than say per extended basic > block

[Bug testsuite/69488] tests in gnat/sso give a lot of spurious failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69488 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Emrich --- Created attachment 37491 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37491&action=edit proposed patch, new version * gnat.dg/sso/*.adb: Robustify dg-output directives. Changed conv1.adb again. The

[Bug c++/69517] New: [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517 Bug ID: 69517 Summary: [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/69436] Method returning "auto&" fails to resolve "*this" (-std=c++17)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69436 --- Comment #6 from vmorgulys at gmail dot com --- Hello Jonathan, I have another similar issue with auto and deleted contructrors ("=delete"). They are not detected at compile time. Do you think it is related to what you mention in your comment

[Bug c++/69379] [6 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2366

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69379 --- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Jan 27 16:46:40 2016 New Revision: 232882 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232882&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/69379 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_constant_expressi

[Bug c++/69379] [6 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2366

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69379 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/66797] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr65447.c scan-tree-dump-not ivopts "\\nuse 5\\n"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66797 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug ada/69488] tests in gnat/sso give a lot of spurious failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69488 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Wed Jan 27 16:53:27 2016 New Revision: 232883 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232883&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ada/69488 * gnat.dg/sso/*.adb: Robustify dg-output

[Bug target/68380] NetBSD has SSP in libc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68380 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed Jan 27 16:54:48 2016 New Revision: 232884 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232884&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-01-27 Thomas Klausner PR target/68380 * configure.

[Bug ada/69488] tests in gnat/sso give a lot of spurious failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69488 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68380] NetBSD has SSP in libc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68380 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/69509] [5/6 regression] infinite loop compiling a VLA in a recursive constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69509 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Summary|infi

[Bug target/69512] [6 Regression] ICE when using avx with i586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69512 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Jan 27 17:08:00 2016 New Revision: 232885 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232885&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-01-27 Uros Bizjak PR target/69512 * confi

[Bug c++/69267] [cilkplus] ICE when calling a function with an empty class as an argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69267 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed Jan 27 17:17:23 2016 New Revision: 232887 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232887&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-01-15 Ryan Burn PR cilkplus/69267 * cilk.c (cilk_g

[Bug testsuite/69479] [4.9 only] test case gcc.dg/and-1.c fails on power for gcc 4.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69479 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69267] [cilkplus] ICE when calling a function with an empty class as an argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69267 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/3920] [PPC] wrong register number for CTR in stabs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3920 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug fortran/69514] ICE with nested array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69514 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/69497] ICE in gfc_free_namespace, at fortran/symbol.c:3701

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69497 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/67824] constexpr char* compare operations not constexpr, but char[] operations ARE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67824 --- Comment #2 from Erich Keane --- Don't know if it is a result of the red-hat packaging, or the .1 release, but the 3.7.1 release from here: http://llvm.org/releases/download.html seems to no longer crash.

[Bug fortran/66094] Handle transpose(A) in inline matmul

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66094 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/67824] constexpr char* compare operations not constexpr, but char[] operations ARE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67824 --- Comment #3 from Erich Keane --- Don't know if it is a result of the red-hat packaging, or the .1 release, but the 3.7.1 release from here: http://llvm.org/releases/download.html seems to no longer crash.(In reply to Erich Keane from comment

[Bug c/69518] New: Flag -g causes "error: type variant has different TYPE_VFIELD"

ty: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 37493 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37493&action=edit C source code gcc trunk, dat

[Bug target/5372] [powerpc-*-eabi] -mno-eabi not working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5372 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2004-01-02 06:15:10 |2016-1-27 CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/69447] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-schedule-insns and mixed 8/16/32/64bit arithmetics @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69447 --- Comment #14 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Richard Henderson from comment #13) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11) > > Without knowing the lra-remat code at all, I just wonder if subreg_regs > > needs to be one per the whol

[Bug target/10778] Exception handling seems to fail on a powerpc using GCC 3.2.3 powerpc-eabi cross compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10778 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug java/50045] [4.9/5/6 regression] ICE in gcc/java/lang.c:427 with -fdump-tree-all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50045 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug debug/69518] [6 Regression] Flag -g causes "error: type variant has different TYPE_VFIELD"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69518 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/22238] Awful error messages with virtual functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/69385] [6 regression] ICE on valid with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69385 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/24375] Wrong line number in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24375 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2006-01-15 21:05:21 |2016-1-27 CC|

[Bug lto/69254] [6 Regression] ICE in streamer_get_builtin_tree when using -fsanitize=shift on the compile side only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69254 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 27 18:48:30 2016 New Revision: 232891 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232891&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR lto/69254 * sanitizer.def: Add BEGIN_SANITIZER_BUILTIN

[Bug lto/69254] [6 Regression] ICE in streamer_get_builtin_tree when using -fsanitize=shift on the compile side only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69254 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/69126] [6 regression] _Pragma does not apply if part of a macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126 --- Comment #16 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Wed Jan 27 18:57:51 2016 New Revision: 232893 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232893&root=gcc&view=rev Log: libcpp: use better locations for _Pragma tokens (preprocessor/69126)

[Bug preprocessor/69126] [6 regression] _Pragma does not apply if part of a macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/20906] excessive diagnostic messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20906 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/15767] ppc-linux type attribute aligned, packed on vector types behaves wrongly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15767 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2004-06-01 22:33:42 |2016-1-27 CC|

[Bug c++/22238] Awful error messages with virtual functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238 --- Comment #20 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #19) > Is it time to close this one out as fixed? with gcc HEAD 6.0.0 20160127 and the testcase in comment #12, I get: prog.cc: In member function 

[Bug debug/69518] [6 Regression] Flag -g causes "error: type variant has different TYPE_VFIELD"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69518 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/15767] ppc-linux type attribute aligned, packed on vector types behaves wrongly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15767 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-*-linux-*, | |powerpc-*-elf-*

[Bug c++/20906] excessive diagnostic messages for missing template arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20906 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|excessive diagnostic|excessive diagnostic

[Bug c/68062] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE when comparing vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68062 --- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Jan 27 19:13:42 2016 New Revision: 232894 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232894&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/68062 * c-typeck.c (build_binary_op) [EQ_EXPR, GE

[Bug c++/22238] Awful error messages with virtual functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238 --- Comment #21 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #19) > /tmp/test2.cc:9:24: error: return-statement with a value, in function > returning 'void' [-fpermissive] > return P->bar() + *P; >

[Bug c/68062] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE when comparing vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68062 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regressi

[Bug c++/69131] [4.9/5 Regression] default constructor of union incorrectly deleted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69131 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jan 27 19:18:28 2016 New Revision: 232895 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232895&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/69131 * method.c (walk_field_subobs): Add dtor_fro

[Bug c++/20906] excessive diagnostic messages for missing template arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20906 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- With a slight change in the parse tree, we get a much better message. prog.cc:3:38: error: wrong number of template arguments (0, should be 1) template void foo::pop(bar<>&, int) {}

[Bug c++/68949] [5/6 Regression] Implicit initialization of array member silently miscompiling.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68949 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jan 27 19:18:33 2016 New Revision: 232896 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232896&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/68949 * optimize.c (maybe_clone_body): Clear DECL

[Bug rtl-optimization/16456] PowerPC - redundant subtract involving pointer types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16456 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/68398] [6 Regression] coremark regression due to r229685

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68398 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed Jan 27 19:19:47 2016 New Revision: 232897 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232897&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/68398 * params.def (PARAM_FSM_SCALE_PA

[Bug tree-optimization/68398] [6 Regression] coremark regression due to r229685

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68398 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/62316] poor location for missing braces warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62316 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug debug/66869] [6 regression] -Wunused-function no longer warns for static declarations without definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66869 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 27 19:32:49 2016 New Revision: 232899 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232899&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/66869 * c-decl.c (c_write_global_declarations_1):

[Bug debug/66869] [6 regression] -Wunused-function no longer warns for static declarations without definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66869 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for C so far, C++ still broken.

[Bug target/67281] HTM builtins aren't treated as compiler barriers on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67281 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #10 from Peter Bergne

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 --- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt --- LTO is creating a clone of reg_save_code, specialized on a particular value of parameter reg. The compiled code contains a badly formed address expression, causing the segfault. Continuing to look.

[Bug c++/68763] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_unstripped_args, at cp/pt.c:1132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68763 --- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill --- Does anyone have a reduced testcase for this? Jakub, where are we modifying the TREE_PURPOSE after creating the METHOD_TYPE?

[Bug c++/24375] Wrong line number in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24375 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/67564] Segfault on sourced allocattion statement with class(*) arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67564 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Created attachment 37395 [details] > A provisional patch for the PR > > This fixes the immediate problem. I think some tidying up of unlimited > polymorphism is needed. In any case, I am not in a pos

[Bug target/68986] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68986 --- Comment #18 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Jan 27 19:54:03 2016 New Revision: 232901 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232901&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Don't change stack_alignment_needed for __tls_get_addr __tls_get_

[Bug target/69512] [6 Regression] ICE when using avx with i586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69512 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/60526] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Accepts-invalid: Variable name same as type name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60526 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/66487] [6 Regression] Firefox segfault with LTO enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487 --- Comment #16 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14) > (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #4) > > Actually, I guess checking for this is more of a fit for an uninitialized > > read detector such as MemorySanitiz

[Bug c++/66487] [6 Regression] Firefox segfault with LTO enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487 --- Comment #17 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #13) > > Author: hubicka > > Date: Wed Jan 13 23:47:45 2016 > > New Revision: 232356 > > > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/view

[Bug c++/68763] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_unstripped_args, at cp/pt.c:1132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68763 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #15) > Does anyone have a reduced testcase for this? I've started delta and creduce, but it is boost, so it will take a while (at 7.6MB so far). > Jakub, where are w

[Bug c/68062] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE when comparing vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68062 --- Comment #17 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Jan 27 20:31:00 2016 New Revision: 232903 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232903&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/68062 * c-typeck.c (build_binary_op) [EQ_EXPR, GE

[Bug c/68062] [4.9 Regression] ICE when comparing vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68062 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug fortran/60526] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Accepts-invalid: Variable name same as type name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60526 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- Here is the AST dump. Note the upcase letter in the symtree for the type. We are probably missing an upcase string compare there... Namespace: A-H: (REAL 4) I-N: (INTEGER 4) O-Z: (REAL 4) procedure name =

[Bug target/69519] New: STV doesn't use xmm register for DImove move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69519 Bug ID: 69519 Summary: STV doesn't use xmm register for DImove move Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug c++/67407] [6 regression] ice in friend_accessible_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67407 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/66763] [6 Regression] 25_algorithms/remove/requirements/explicit_instantiation/2.cc fails on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66763 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/69461] [6 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69461 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/69517] [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/69520] New: Implement reversal of -fcheck options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69520 Bug ID: 69520 Summary: Implement reversal of -fcheck options Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/60526] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Accepts-invalid: Variable name same as type name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60526 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 37495 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37495&action=edit provisional patch The patch appears to work, but the formatting for the errors looks strange. Consider: ig25

[Bug c++/66487] [6 Regression] Firefox segfault with LTO enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487 --- Comment #18 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #16) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14) > > (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #4) > > > Actually, I guess checking for this is more of a fit for an uni

[Bug fortran/69385] [6 regression] ICE on valid with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69385 --- Comment #18 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Jan 27 21:24:01 2016 New Revision: 232904 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232904&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-01-27 Paul Thomas PR fortran/69385 * trans-expr.c

[Bug c++/68763] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_unstripped_args, at cp/pt.c:1132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68763 --- Comment #17 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16) > (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #15) > > Does anyone have a reduced testcase for this? > > I've started delta and creduce, but it is boost, so it

[Bug c++/69521] New: -Wdeprecated-declarations errors in unused inline methods

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69521 Bug ID: 69521 Summary: -Wdeprecated-declarations errors in unused inline methods Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c++/22238] Awful error messages with virtual functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238 --- Comment #23 from David Malcolm --- Created attachment 37496 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37496&action=edit Patch to fix the case in comment #12 (for next stage 1)

[Bug target/17381] Unnecessary register move for float extend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17381 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/22238] Awful error messages with virtual functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238 --- Comment #22 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #20) [...] > I maintain my opinion that any user-facing diagnostic using %qE is > potentially broken. Thanks; I'm inclined to agree. Notes to self: implementat

[Bug c++/53341] overloaded operator delete(void *) appear in object file even when not directly used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53341 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- With -std=c++0x included (until a few days ago on trunk), which is what caused the difference. I don't see _ZdlPv since 4.8.0 though.

[Bug rtl-optimization/69447] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-schedule-insns and mixed 8/16/32/64bit arithmetics @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69447 --- Comment #15 from Richard Henderson --- Author: rth Date: Wed Jan 27 22:08:02 2016 New Revision: 232905 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232905&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-opt/69447 * lra-remat.c (subreg_regs): New. (dump_candidate

[Bug rtl-optimization/69447] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-schedule-insns and mixed 8/16/32/64bit arithmetics @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69447 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/69447] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-schedule-insns and mixed 8/16/32/64bit arithmetics @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69447 --- Comment #17 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to Richard Henderson from comment #16) > Fixed. This patch is not going to the 5-branch?

[Bug rtl-optimization/69447] [5 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-schedule-insns and mixed 8/16/32/64bit arithmetics @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69447 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug target/68662] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090210 c_lto_20090210_0.o-c_lto_20090210_1.o link, -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68662 --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra --- For the testcase in comment #7, global_options are inconsistent (*) and wrong when compiling foo. I see flag_pic == 2 there?? (*) In particular, TARGET_RELOCATABLE and flag_pic don't agree. See config/rs6000/

[Bug fortran/69484] [5/6 Regression] documentation issue: -Wtabs and -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69484 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Wed Jan 27 22:32:52 2016 New Revision: 232906 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232906&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-01-27 Janus Weil PR fortran/69484 * inv

<    1   2   3   >