https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68398
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69438
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
The dup PR69438 has a smaller testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69426
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #3)
> Reproduced (on x86_64) with 5 branch.
>
> The ICE seems to have been triggered by removing the expand_omp_local from
> parloops and using a separate omp_expand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Summary|[6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68398
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69414
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openacc
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69426
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, patch
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69351
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69351
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69434
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jan 23 09:54:19 2016
New Revision: 232763
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232763&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/69434
* genrecog.c: Define INCLUDE_ALGORITHM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69434
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69203
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 37442
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37442&action=edit
More reduced testcase
I know this reduced testcase is invalid code but I think the original code was
valid. It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69440
Bug ID: 69440
Summary: [6 Regression] Revision 232071 breaks bootstrap on
x86_64-w64-mingw32
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68514
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Emrich ---
Revison 232071 broke bootstrap on x86_64-w64-mingw32, see bug 69440.
I can't test until trunk bootstraps again for x86_64-w64-mingw32.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68514
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Rainer Emrich from comment #4)
> Revison 232071 broke bootstrap on x86_64-w64-mingw32, see bug 69440.
> I can't test until trunk bootstraps again for x86_64-w64-mingw32.
You could manually rever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 69422, which changed state.
Bug 69422 Summary: Unexpected result with allocatable character type component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69422
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69422
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69436
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64969
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmorgulys at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69266
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
A dup of PR 69440 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69440
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69441
Bug ID: 69441
Summary: pandn implemented as pand within asm
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69422
--- Comment #4 from Antony Lewis ---
But "source" is allocatable, not a pointer? (the pointer P is explicitly
allocated in the example)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68357
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 37443
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37443&action=edit
Preprocessed file for g++.dg/other/darwin-cfstring1.C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69422
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 69422, which changed state.
Bug 69422 Summary: Unexpected result with allocatable character type component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69422
What|Removed |Added
/armv7a-hardfloat-linux-gnueabi --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-232760-checking-yes-rtl-df-nographite-armv7a-hardfloat
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160123 (experimental) (GCC)
$ armv7a-hardfloat-linux-gnueabi-gcc testcase.c -Og
$ qemu-arm ./a.out
ff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67373
--- Comment #5 from Senthil Kumar Selvaraj ---
The last released version of avr-libc (1.8.1) doesn't properly work with the
spec file based device support approach introduced in 5.x. As the GCC 5 release
notes (https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/changes.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69441
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69443
Bug ID: 69443
Summary: -fsanitize=address should add -lpthread to linker call
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69442
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69443
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'm afraid it is undesirable, various projects flag ldd -u diagnosed
dependencies as errors. Perhaps just configure without -fsanitize=address in
CFLAGS and only add those for the actual builds?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69442
--- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #1)
> Does this occur for other optimisations levels?
It happens only with -Og.
Difference -O1 -> -Og:
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
@ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68442
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Created attachment 37430 [details]
> Patch for testing
The patch looks good to me. No regression.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69329
--- Comment #3 from Mikhail Maltsev ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> That is just weird and I can't reproduce it.
Somehow these two failures disappeared after rebuild.
> That said, perhaps it would be
> better to only propagate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69022
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Sat Jan 23 16:01:47 2016
New Revision: 232766
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232766&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/58109 - alignas() fails to compile with constant expression
PR c++/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58109
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Sat Jan 23 16:01:47 2016
New Revision: 232766
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232766&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/58109 - alignas() fails to compile with constant expression
PR c++/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58109
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58601
Bug 58601 depends on bug 58109, which changed state.
Bug 58109 Summary: alignas() fails to compile with constant expression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58109
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69022
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69444
Bug ID: 69444
Summary: [6 Regression] recent changes broke x64_64 -> powerpc
crosscompiler build
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68398
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Actually, it's not trying to prevent an irreducible loop, it's trying prevent
creating a loop with several latches or subloops. So it's not as bad as I
first thought.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69445
Bug ID: 69445
Summary: Fail to devirtualize call to base class function even
though derived class type is 'final'
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59012
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58601
Bug 58601 depends on bug 59012, which changed state.
Bug 59012 Summary: alignas does not support parameter pack expansions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59012
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64236
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2015-04-07 00:00:00 |2016-1-23
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69318
tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68398
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop ---
Thanks Jeff for looking into this issue.
I was thinking about a heuristic as you mentioned in comment #2:
what about allowing creation of irreducible loops, multiple latches, etc. after
the loop optimizers ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69446
Bug ID: 69446
Summary: [6 Regression] cow-stdexcept.cc:374:1: error: alias d
efinitions not supported in this configuration
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69329
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Mikhail Maltsev from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> > That is just weird and I can't reproduce it.
> Somehow these two failures disappeared after rebuild.
>
> > That
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65685
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68398
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Doing it after the loop optimizer doesn't help. I haven't really looked into
why.
The concerns around not creating new subloops or multiple latches pre-date a
lot of the loop infrastructure changes Richi h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69446
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69440
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target Milestone|---
/armv7a-hardfloat-linux-gnueabi-as
--with-sysroot=/usr/armv7a-hardfloat-linux-gnueabi --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-232760-checking-yes-rtl-df-nographite-armv7a-hardfloat
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160123 (experimental) (GCC)
$ armv7a-hardfloat-linux-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69444
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69446
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69442
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69447
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69445
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68730
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69426
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Sat Jan 23 20:28:17 2016
New Revision: 232767
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232767&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix clobber removal in parloops
2016-01-23 Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69426
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Sat Jan 23 20:43:19 2016
New Revision: 232768
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232768&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix clobber removal in parloops
2016-01-23 Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68400
--- Comment #2 from Felix Fietkau ---
Created attachment 37446
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37446&action=edit
Preprocessed source code to reproduce the issue
Triggered the error using the following command:
mips-openwrt-l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69426
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68161
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68187
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69315
--- Comment #4 from Gert-jan Los ---
The original problem is also resolved by the proposed patch. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68204
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68219
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68228
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
Summary|__builtin_ia32_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68230
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68244
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #1 from An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68246
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68260
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
#include
struct spin {
void lock() {
while (flag.test_and_set(std::memory_order_acquire))
;
}
void unlock() { flag.clear(std::memory_order_release); }
std::atomic_flag flag = ATOMIC_FLAG
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68272
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68280
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid, diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68295
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68303
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68244
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
> Does this work now?
The ICE can be avoided by changing the register to one that can be fixed on
hppa. For example,
dave@mx3210:~/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite$ svn diff g++.dg/parse/parens3.C
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68340
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68377
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68380
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patches should goto gcc-patches@ .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68386
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68390
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68390
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68491
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patches should goto gcc-patches@ and should be based off the trunk of GCC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68643
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
Introduced by this change:
2015-09-25 Teresa Johnson
* opts.c (finish_options): Unset -freorder-blocks-and-partition
if not using profile.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69448
Bug ID: 69448
Summary: Abbreviated function templates with deduced return
type still broken
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69446
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Jan 23 22:24:59 2016
New Revision: 232769
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232769&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/69446
* config/os/hpux/os_defines.h (_G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69446
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69449
Bug ID: 69449
Summary: Some invalid fold expressions incorrectly accepted
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68744
--- Comment #9 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Jan 23 23:32:13 2016
New Revision: 232770
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232770&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libfortran/68744
* runtime/backtrace.c: Include g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68744
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65685
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68106
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69450
Bug ID: 69450
Summary: [6 Regression] libstdc++-v3/include/math.h:66:1 2:
error: 'constexpr bool std::isnan(double)' conflicts
with a previous declaration
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64826
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
