[Bug tree-optimization/69353] New: [6 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: non-trivial conversion at assignment) w/ -O2 (-O3) -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69353 Bug ID: 69353 Summary: [6 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: non-trivial conversion at assignment) w/ -O2 (-O3) -floop-nest-optimize Product: gcc

[Bug bootstrap/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/69354] New: std::thread doesn't support move-only callable objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69354 Bug ID: 69354 Summary: std::thread doesn't support move-only callable objects Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug bootstrap/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 --- Comment #4 from Jan Smets --- compile with : -xc -c pr69352.best -w -o /dev/null -O1 $ cat pr69352.best typedef enum { REG_HSTRH, REG_HSTRL, REG_HFAERH, REG_HFAERL, REG_HIMRH, REG_HIMRL, REG_HCMRH, REG_HCMRL, REG_HADDRH,

[Bug bootstrap/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Reproduces with -O1 on x86_64-linux too. Slightly cleaned up testcase: int a[10][14], b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i; void bar (void); int foo (int x) { unsigned j; int k = 0, l; int m; if (h) m = 12;

[Bug tree-optimization/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code Compon

[Bug tree-optimization/69353] [6 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: non-trivial conversion at assignment) w/ -O2 (-O3) -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69353 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug middle-end/69347] [6 regression] excessive compile time with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69347 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- There are various bugs in the r232508 change. The gcc_assert (sz0 == sz1); gcc_assert (max0 == max1); gcc_assert (rev0 == rev1); asserts are clearly bogus, while for compatible type I bet size will be a

[Bug lto/69133] [6 Regression] LTO segfault in lto_get_decl_name_mapping() on 483.xalancbmk with -flto-partition=none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69133 --- Comment #7 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #5) > The problem seems to be that cgraph_node::get_untransformed_body checks > presence of body by DECL_RESULT which is NULL for thunks. Rest of place

[Bug tree-optimization/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > There are various bugs in the r232508 change. > The > gcc_assert (sz0 == sz1); > gcc_assert (max0 == max1); > gcc_assert (rev0 == rev1); > asserts are clea

[Bug middle-end/69347] [6 regression] excessive compile time with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69347 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/69328] [6 Regression] ice in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1379 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69328 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Looks good - can you take this bug then?

[Bug libstdc++/69354] std::thread doesn't support move-only callable objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69354 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCON

[Bug target/68015] ICE in s390_emit_compare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68015 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/58035] LRA: S/390: Ada bootstrap fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58035 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/69133] [6 Regression] LTO segfault in lto_get_decl_name_mapping() on 483.xalancbmk with -flto-partition=none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69133 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- Well, -flto-partition=none does bot IPA optimization and codegen in one run. In this case the body was once read by ipa-cp to duplicate the thunk and second time by expand_thunk. With other methods the streami

[Bug tree-optimization/69353] [6 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: non-trivial conversion at assignment) w/ -O2 (-O3) -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69353 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug c++/69355] New: Wrong results with -O1 optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69355 Bug ID: 69355 Summary: Wrong results with -O1 optimization Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/69305] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128 @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69305 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11

[Bug c++/69355] Wrong results with -O1 optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69355 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Hiltebrand --- Created attachment 37392 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37392&action=edit the preprocessed file The attachment was slightly too large, you can download it from: https://www.dropbo

[Bug debug/68860] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-1.c -flto -O3 -g line 16 arg1 == 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.0 |7.0 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug tree-optimization/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 --- Comment #9 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > There are various bugs in the r232508 change. > The > gcc_assert (sz0 == sz1); > gcc_assert (max0 == max1); > gcc_assert (rev0 == rev1); > asse

[Bug c++/69355] Wrong results with -O1 optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69355 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37392|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/68767] [6 regression] spurious warning: null argument where non-null required

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68767 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/61225] [5/6 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/66612] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/20050830-1.c scan-assembler bdn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66612 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug c++/66858] [6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/pch/system-2.C -O2 -g assembly comparison on aarch64-none-elf, arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66858 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/68782] [6 regression] bad reference member formed with constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68782 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note, I gave up on this PR, so if Jason or somebody more familiar with C++ FE than myself could pick it up, it would be greatly appreciated.

[Bug c++/69355] Wrong results with -O1 optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69355 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Hiltebrand --- I'm sorry. I did not zip it as the guidelines said explicitly: What we do not want [...] An attached archive (tar, zip, shar, whatever) containing all (or some :-) of the above. and the preprocessed fi

[Bug c++/66858] [6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/pch/system-2.C -O2 -g assembly comparison on aarch64-none-elf, arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66858 --- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- It passes today on arm-none-eabi and aarch64-none-elf. John, does it still fail on hppa64?

[Bug debug/66668] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/stacked-qualified-types-3.c scan-assembler-times DIE \\([^\n]*\\) DW_TAG_(?:const|volatile|atomic|restrict)_type 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/69355] Wrong results with -O1 optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69355 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug middle-end/69347] [6 regression] excessive compile time with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69347 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug lto/69133] [6 Regression] LTO segfault in lto_get_decl_name_mapping() on 483.xalancbmk with -flto-partition=none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69133 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Tue Jan 19 11:57:41 2016 New Revision: 232552 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232552&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR lto/69133 * cgraphunit.c (cgraph_node::expand_thunk):

[Bug lto/69136] [6 Regression] ICE in lto_symtab_prevailing_virtual_decl, at lto/lto-symtab.c:991

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69136 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Tue Jan 19 11:59:58 2016 New Revision: 232553 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232553&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR lto/69136 * lto-symtab.c (lto_symtab_prevailing_virtual

[Bug web/69356] New: Wrong description of compound literals for scalar types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69356 Bug ID: 69356 Summary: Wrong description of compound literals for scalar types Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Prior

[Bug web/69356] Wrong description of compound literals for scalar types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69356 Christian Brauner changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation URL|

[Bug libstdc++/69354] std::thread doesn't support move-only callable objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69354 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > MoveOnly(MoveOnly&) =delete; This is not caused by the faxct it's move-only, but by the unconventional non-const parameter on the deleted copy constructo

[Bug c++/69355] Wrong results with -O1 optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69355 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug middle-end/69347] [6 regression] excessive compile time with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69347 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Manual git-bisect on gcc112 points to the same revision: r228739.

[Bug go/69357] New: libgo refers to _end in a non-weak way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69357 Bug ID: 69357 Summary: libgo refers to _end in a non-weak way Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug go/69357] libgo refers to _end in a non-weak way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69357 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Btw, might be an interesting interaction between --no-add-needed and --as-needed as well (--as-needed is used by default by us). But that would point to a linker issue. No testcase - this was observed when

[Bug lto/69133] [6 Regression] LTO segfault in lto_get_decl_name_mapping() on 483.xalancbmk with -flto-partition=none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69133 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/69136] [6 Regression] ICE in lto_symtab_prevailing_virtual_decl, at lto/lto-symtab.c:991

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69136 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/68824] [6 Regression] libtsan is missing the __interceptor___tls_get_addr symbol without bumping the soname

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68824 --- Comment #10 from Dmitry Vyukov --- Submitted in: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=258119

[Bug libstdc++/69354] std::thread doesn't support move-only callable objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69354 --- Comment #3 from Anthony Williams --- I hadn't noticed I had omitted the const! Surely the intent of 12.8p11.2 is that if you can't actually copy the bases and/or members with the specified signature then the defaulted copy constructor is del

[Bug c++/69355] [5/6 Regression] Wrong results with -O1 optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69355 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/68955] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86-64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68955 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 19 12:34:45 2016 New Revision: 232554 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232554&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/68955 PR rtl-optimization/64557

[Bug rtl-optimization/64557] get_addr in true_dependence_1 cannot handle VALUE inside an expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64557 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 19 12:34:45 2016 New Revision: 232554 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232554&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/68955 PR rtl-optimization/64557

[Bug rtl-optimization/68955] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86-64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68955 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69345] [6 Regression] 459.GemsFDTD regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69345 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/68832] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/alias-2.c -O1 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68832 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/68824] [6 Regression] libtsan is missing the __interceptor___tls_get_addr symbol without bumping the soname

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68824 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 19 12:45:54 2016 New Revision: 232555 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232555&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/68824 * tsan/tsan_interceptors.cc (NEED_TLS_

[Bug libstdc++/69354] std::thread doesn't support move-only callable objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69354 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Anthony Williams from comment #3) > I hadn't noticed I had omitted the const! It took me a while to spot it too! > Surely the intent of 12.8p11.2 is that if you can't actually copy the bases

[Bug lto/61886] [4.9/5/6 Regression] LTO breaks fread with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/68824] [6 Regression] libtsan is missing the __interceptor___tls_get_addr symbol without bumping the soname

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68824 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/65797] [5/6 regression] IPA ICF causes function to be emitted with no debug line info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65797 --- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka --- OK, I wonder if the patch attached in Commment #8 (i.e. outputting debug info for the wrapper) seems preferred solution? we probably can either commit it or not and leave this to the general PR that ipa-icf me

[Bug libstdc++/69354] std::thread doesn't support move-only callable objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69354 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/69129] [6 Regression] ICE in get_attr_got, at config/mips/mips.md:694 on mips-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69129 Paul Hua changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 f

[Bug lto/61886] [4.9/5/6 Regression] LTO breaks fread with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Target Milestone|4.9.4

[Bug rtl-optimization/47992] ICE: SIGSEGV in ira_reuse_stack_slot (ira-color.c:2887) with -fweb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47992 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/66223] [5/6 Regression] Diagnostic of pure virtual function call broken, including __cxa_pure_virtual

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66223 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- Well, if you rely on undefined behaviour, you should not be surprised when your program breaks with optimization. I am testing the following patch: Index: ipa-devirt.c =

[Bug libstdc++/69354] std::thread doesn't support move-only callable objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69354 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- We can't even partially specialize the _Head_base type on whether the element type is M(M&) or M(const M&) because we can't detect which signature has been deleted by using something like is_constructible.

[Bug tree-optimization/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 19 13:19:01 2016 New Revision: 232557 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232557&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-01-19 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/69352

[Bug tree-optimization/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/65779] [5/6 Regression] undefined local symbol on powerpc [regression]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65779 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 19 13:21:04 2016 New Revision: 232558 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232558&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/65779 * shrink-wrap.c: Include valtrack.h.

[Bug ipa/66223] [5/6 Regression] Diagnostic of pure virtual function call broken, including __cxa_pure_virtual

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66223 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think it is a bad idea to pessimize code just because it might be invoking undefined behavior. I'd really do this only if the user asked for that, and IMHO such a switch is flag_sanitize & SANITIZE_UNREACH

[Bug debug/65779] [5 Regression] undefined local symbol on powerpc [regression]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65779 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6 Regression] undefined |[5 Regression] undefined

[Bug tree-optimization/69336] Constant value not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69336 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 19 13:27:11 2016 New Revision: 232559 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232559&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-01-19 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/69336

[Bug tree-optimization/69336] Constant value not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69336 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/67755] [5 Regression] Bad edge probability/block freqency for tree jump threading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67755 --- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt --- Hi Jeff, I think we would appreciate having this backported to 5 so it can be fixed in those distro releases that ship 5. This caused a significant drop in an important benchmark for us. Thanks!

[Bug c++/59759] internal compiler error: in unify, using std::enable_if on classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59759 --- Comment #14 from Gereon Kremer --- I upgraded to 5.3 and sure enough, the bug still fires: $ g++ --version g++ (GCC) 5.3.0 Test_GCC.cpp: In substitution of ‘template void f(const A*) [with T = ]’: Test_GCC.cpp:25:7: required from here Tes

[Bug tree-optimization/69358] New: [6 regression] internal compiler error: in equal_mem_array_ref_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69358 Bug ID: 69358 Summary: [6 regression] internal compiler error: in equal_mem_array_ref_p Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/69359] New: Warn about constant comparisons between pointers and arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69359 Bug ID: 69359 Summary: Warn about constant comparisons between pointers and arrays Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug tree-optimization/69358] [6 regression] internal compiler error: in equal_mem_array_ref_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69358 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/69336] Constant value not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69336 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/69129] [6 Regression] ICE in get_attr_got, at config/mips/mips.md:694 on mips-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69129 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug c++/68586] [6 Regression] Enum template parameter wrongly rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68586 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Jan 19 14:02:40 2016 New Revision: 232562 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232562&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/68586 * constexpr.c (clear_cv_cache): New.

[Bug c++/68586] [6 Regression] Enum template parameter wrongly rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68586 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69345] [6 Regression] 459.GemsFDTD regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69345 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 37394 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37394&action=edit patch for testing I am testing the attached. It seems to fix the regression.

[Bug target/69135] [5/6 Regression][ARM] instruction cannot be conditional -- `vcvtpne.s32.f32 s0,s0'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69135 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Jan 19 14:30:23 2016 New Revision: 232566 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232566&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] PR target/69135: Mark ARMv8 vcvt instructions as unc

[Bug c++/66858] [6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/pch/system-2.C -O2 -g assembly comparison on aarch64-none-elf, arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66858 --- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2016-01-19 6:38 AM, ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66858 > > --- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- > It passes today on arm-non

[Bug c++/68965] [5/6 Regression] `-Wunused-parameter` is reported in variadic lambda or function using sizeof...(xs)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68965 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Jan 19 14:37:49 2016 New Revision: 232569 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232569&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/68965 * pt.c (tsubst_copy): Mark elements in exp

[Bug c++/66858] [6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/pch/system-2.C -O2 -g assembly comparison on aarch64-none-elf, arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66858 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug jit/68446] [6 Regression] jit testsuite failures seen inside dwarf2out.c:gen_producer_string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68446 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/68513] [5/6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:8832, c_maybe_const_expr in IL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513 --- Comment #13 from Jan Smets --- I don't think is fixed in 5.x-branch

[Bug middle-end/66877] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-3-big-array.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vect_recog_over_widening_pattern: detected" 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66877 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- For some reason you get widening shifts recognized while I get them not supported by the HW (with the cross at -O2 -ftree-vectorize). -mfpu=neon doesn't help. I still can't reproduce your dump file with /

[Bug jit/68446] [6 Regression] jit testsuite failures seen inside dwarf2out.c:gen_producer_string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68446 --- Comment #7 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Tue Jan 19 14:35:16 2016 New Revision: 232567 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232567&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix memory chunk corruption for opts_obstack (PR jit/68446) gcc/Change

[Bug middle-end/66178] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Another label as values ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1059

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66178 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org Assi

[Bug middle-end/66877] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-3-big-array.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vect_recog_over_widening_pattern: detected" 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66877 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > For some reason you get widening shifts recognized while I get them not > supported by the HW (with the cross at -O2 -ftree-vectorize). -mfpu=neon

[Bug target/65161] ICE: in vec<_haifa_insn_data, va_heap, vl_embed>::operator[], at vec.h:736 with -O3 -fselective-scheduling2 -mtune=slm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65161 Andrey Belevantsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/52203] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7136 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 and other custom flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203 Andrey Belevantsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69135] [5/6 Regression][ARM] instruction cannot be conditional -- `vcvtpne.s32.f32 s0,s0'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69135 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/69355] [5/6 Regression] Wrong results with -O1 optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69355 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- --- pr69355.ii 2016-01-19 13:00:26.772400572 +0100 +++ pr69355-1.ii2016-01-19 15:54:26.790557524 +0100 @@ -30334,10 +30334,17 @@ namespace std __attribute__ ((__visibili # 4 "mytest.cpp" typedef tv

[Bug target/69135] [5/6 Regression][ARM] instruction cannot be conditional -- `vcvtpne.s32.f32 s0,s0'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69135 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Jan 19 15:02:15 2016 New Revision: 232570 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232570&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] PR target/69135: Mark ARMv8 vcvt instructions as unc

[Bug target/68753] PowerPC: double precision reciprocal estimate missed optimisations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68753 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/66877] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-3-big-array.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vect_recog_over_widening_pattern: detected" 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66877 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 19 Jan 2016, ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66877 > > --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to Richard Biener

[Bug c++/69220] Internal error with array of negative size and initializers for it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69220 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

  1   2   3   >