https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69190
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
It is indeed. Thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69147
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69058
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon Jan 11 08:55:16 2016
New Revision: 232208
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232208&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't parallelize loops if libgomp not supported
2016-01-11 To
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67425
--- Comment #3 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Mon Jan 11 09:06:14 2016
New Revision: 232209
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232209&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix docs for -frandom-seed.
2016-01-11 Yury Gribov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67425
--- Comment #4 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Mon Jan 11 09:11:11 2016
New Revision: 232210
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232210&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport fix docs for -frandom-seed.
2016-01-11 Yury Gribo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69058
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67425
--- Comment #5 from Yury Gribov ---
Martin, is this better now? Could you close the bug?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69108
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon Jan 11 09:19:33 2016
New Revision: 232211
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232211&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Handle case that outer phi res is not used in a phi in gather_sc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69220
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69187
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69219
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69217
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69147
--- Comment #2 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Dominique, could you please run ASan tests with
ASAN_OPTIONS=debug=1:verbosity=2? This might be helpful for further debugging.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69216
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69214
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69187
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, that should do.
/* PR target/69187 */
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_neon } */
/* { dg-options "-O0" } */
/* { dg-add-options arm_neon } */
Please send the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69217
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69108
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69213
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
The SSA _1 doesn't have a def stmt ...
int main() ()
{
bool a_lsm.9;
int a_lsm.8;
bool b_lsm.7;
int b_lsm.6;
unsigned int _1;
unsigned int _3;
int _7;
int a.0_9;
:
a.0_9 = a;
if (a.0_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69213
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 69212 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69212
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69209
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69109
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon Jan 11 09:38:28 2016
New Revision: 232212
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232212&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't allow latch with phi in try_transform_to_exit_first_loop_a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Huber ---
I did a very rough check to see which code is faster on the PSIM/GDB simulator
using the following input data:
void printk(const char *fmt, ...)
{
va_list ap;
va_start(ap, fmt);
vprintk(fmt, ap);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69207
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Seems there is a mismatch in between fold_convertible_p and
> verify_gimple_assign_unary (and also the gimplifier).
> E.g. for this special case fold_convertible
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69199
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
OTOH it doesn't really matter to the middle-end.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69222
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69209
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Unless I'm misreading ipa-split.c, it seems it is unprepared to see addressable
retvals with gimple reg type, but where due to the addressability retval is not
is_gimple_val. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69224
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69222
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66616
--- Comment #20 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Jan 11 09:59:48 2016
New Revision: 232213
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232213&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 66616] Check for thunks when adding extra constants to clones
2016
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66616
--- Comment #21 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Jan 11 10:03:44 2016
New Revision: 232214
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232214&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR ipa/66616] Copy can_change_signature flag to artificial thunks
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68979
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68981
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68986
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69044
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Jan 11 10:09:17 2016
New Revision: 232215
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232215&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR ipa/69044] Do not clone for param removal when not possible
2016-01
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69109
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69044
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69052
--- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It's my change, I will look into it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69058
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69010
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Mon Jan 11 10:27:17 2016
New Revision: 232216
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232216&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/69010
* expr.c (expand_expr_real_1): F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59810
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69161
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65770
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65770
--- Comment #2 from James Greenhalgh ---
r222582 for reference.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69058
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #5)
> Isn't it a gccgo front end (spec) bug, that it doesn't bring in GOMP stuff
> (builtins, link against libgomp) under the presence of
> "-ftree-parallel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69123
--- Comment #16 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Jan 11 10:40:12 2016
New Revision: 232217
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232217&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR69123] make dataflow_set_different details more verbose
for gcc/C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69123
--- Comment #17 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Jan 11 10:40:33 2016
New Revision: 232218
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232218&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR69123] fix handling of MEMs in VTA to avoid dataflow oscillation
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69010
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69225
Bug ID: 69225
Summary: gcc uses double precision instead of single float with
-m32 -std=c99 -msoft-float
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69214
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69123
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69211
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69225
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69155
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > I think we have a dup/related bug where we run into the issue that
> > tree-complex.c
> > wrecks SSA form during
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67896
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65689
--- Comment #14 from James Greenhalgh ---
Jakub, were you planning to backport this fix to 5.4, or would you like me to
do it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69147
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Could you please elaborate?
Is there a way to run manually a test with ASAN_OPTIONS=debug=1:verbosity=2? If
yes, how (I am using tcsh)?
If no, can I do it at the test love? If yes, how? If no, I guess
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67682
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67682
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65689
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #14)
> Jakub, were you planning to backport this fix to 5.4, or would you like me
> to do it?
Forgot about this one. If you could backport it, it would be greatly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69174
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so we have an interleaving store of size 3 (and thus also the SLP group
size is 3) but an interleaved load of size 4 (with gaps). Ideally we'd not
treat
that load as interleaved but we do. The size 3 S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68920
--- Comment #7 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Mon Jan 11 12:07:31 2016
New Revision: 232220
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232220&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2016-01-11 Yuri Rumyantsev
PR rtl-optimization/68920
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69069
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon Jan 11 12:08:38 2016
New Revision: 232221
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232221&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add missing phi args in create_parallel_loop
2016-01-11 Tom de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68841
--- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Mon Jan 11 12:13:50 2016
New Revision: 232223
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232223&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ifcvt] PR rtl-optimization/68841: Make sure one basic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68841
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69069
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69213
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69213
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66616
--- Comment #22 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Jan 11 12:44:53 2016
New Revision: 232226
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232226&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR ipa/66616] Copy can_change_signature flag to artificial thunks
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69225
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69214
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 37302
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37302&action=edit
gcc6-pr69214.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69214
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69226
Bug ID: 69226
Summary: Wrong __SIZE_TYPE__/__PTRDIFF_TYPE__/__WCHAR_TYPE__
for IA MCU
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69053
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from Richard Bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68979
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69077
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
It's not referenced from the t2.cc cgraph at all, just from the WeightedStdDev
constructor, taking its address via the vtable setting.
So the possibly-inlined version is dropped on the floor and we keep th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69226
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Also int3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69226
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 37303
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37303&action=edit
A patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69225
Kirill Yukhin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69227
Bug ID: 69227
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-integral-1.c -O1 (test
for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69227
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Relevant thread on gcc-patches:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg00586.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69225
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
This patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=patch;h=a16c748c075b14ce65ae1f12d8862cef0af87842
fixes it. I will submit a patch with a testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69226
--- Comment #3 from Yulia Koval ---
We can use this patch and fix both this bug and pr68456 for iamcu:
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/iamcu.h b/gcc/config/i386/iamcu.h
index f143bf9..5ca5c5e 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/iamcu.h
+++ b/gcc/config/i3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64821
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
--- Comment #2 from ktk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68563
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69226
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37303|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64782
Bug 64782 depends on bug 64784, which changed state.
Bug 64784 Summary: -march=native should be supported
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64784
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64784
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69226
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 37305
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37305&action=edit
An updated patch
Please try this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68813
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69032
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69227
--- Comment #2 from Andre Vieira ---
I have decided to email the newlib mailinglist to figure out which function
classes we should and should not support for 'arm-none-eabi'.
See https://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2016/msg9.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69147
--- Comment #4 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
If you want use make check stuff, you could try this:
max:~/build/master> setenv ASAN_OPTIONS verbosity=2:debug=1
max:~/build/master> make check RUNTESTFLAGS="asan.exp=memcmp-1.c"
or add such a line to, s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59810
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66339
lh_mouse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lh_mouse at 126 dot com
--- Comment #2 from l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69077
--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka ---
I suppose the problem here is that lto-symtab is not merging symtab nodes but
only the FUNCTION_DECLs so the flag is not merged. Something like this may
help.
Index: lto-symtab.c
==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66339
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
OK, whatever weird definition of leak you are using is irrelevant. The memory
is still in use until the program exits, and there is still a pointer to it. It
is not lost, or forgotten about, it is in use by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68796
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Mon Jan 11 14:44:22 2016
New Revision: 232228
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232228&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[AArch64] PR rtl-optimization/68796: Add patterns for QImo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69211
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I guess the bug is that lots of code in fold-const.c is totally unprepared to
see NOP_EXPR wrapping up INTEGER_CST (or other constants), it assumes that if
argN is say INTEGER_CST, then argN == opN and thus d
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
