[Bug tree-optimization/68976] [6 Regression] ICE w/ -O2 (and above) -fgraphite-identity (or -floop-nest-optimize)

2016-01-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68976 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/69171] [6 Regression] error: unrecognizable insn: on x86_64 with -O2

2016-01-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69171 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 37244 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37244&action=edit A patch

[Bug c++/69029] [6 Regression] bogus -Wmisleading-indentation warning on one-line loops

2016-01-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69029 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug preprocessor/69177] New: Bit-packing optimization makes it too easy to have location_t >= LINE_MAP_MAX_LOCATION_WITH_COLS

2016-01-06 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69177 Bug ID: 69177 Summary: Bit-packing optimization makes it too easy to have location_t >= LINE_MAP_MAX_LOCATION_WITH_COLS Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/68998] [5 Regression] Wrong code generated regarding constexpr arrays

2016-01-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68998 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/68819] Invalid "-Wmisleading-indentation" warning if location_t >=LINE_MAP_MAX_LOCATION_WITH_COLS

2016-01-06 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68819 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||69177 --- Comment #11 from David Malcolm

[Bug rtl-optimization/69032] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in cfg_preds_1, at sel-sched-ir.c:4809 with -fsched-pressure -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling

2016-01-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69032 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.4

[Bug target/69176] [6 Regression] ICE in in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2981 on aarch64-linux-gnu

2016-01-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69176 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Happens with r231970 also.

[Bug fortran/69154] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_where_2, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:5005 on *-linux

2016-01-06 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69154 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||37131 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig

[Bug target/69140] stack alignment + O1 breaks with Microsoft ABI

2016-01-06 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69140 --- Comment #17 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Jan 6 20:19:04 2016 New Revision: 232111 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232111&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/69140 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand

[Bug libstdc++/69092] basic_string constructor and throwing iterators

2016-01-06 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69092 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Jan 6 20:34:41 2016 New Revision: 232112 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232112&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Remove noexcept from function template that can throw PR libstdc

[Bug c++/67824] constexpr char* compare operations not constexpr, but char[] operations ARE

2016-01-06 Thread erich.keane at intel dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67824 --- Comment #1 from Erich Keane --- I just reconfirmed this in 5.3.1 on Fedora: gcc (GCC) 5.3.1 20151207 (Red Hat 5.3.1-2) Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is N

[Bug tree-optimization/67755] [5/6 Regression] Bad edge probability/block freqency for tree jump threading

2016-01-06 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67755 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug target/69176] [6 Regression] ICE in in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2981 on aarch64-linux-gnu

2016-01-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69176 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Note -g is not needed to reproduce the bug and speeds up the compiling a lot.

[Bug middle-end/68983] [6 Regression] ICE: in store_field, at expr.c:6659

2016-01-06 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68983 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 37245 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37245&action=edit possible patch Would this be an appropriate fix? It seems that if the source is a ref we won't copy anything o

[Bug c++/69178] New: [concepts] An invalid expression in a requires-expression is evaluated too eagerly

2016-01-06 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69178 Bug ID: 69178 Summary: [concepts] An invalid expression in a requires-expression is evaluated too eagerly Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug tree-optimization/60890] Performance regression in 4.8 for memory postinc

2016-01-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60890 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #4 from

[Bug c++/69178] [concepts] An invalid expression in a requires-expression is evaluated too eagerly

2016-01-06 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69178 --- Comment #1 from Ville Voutilainen --- This check happens in check_bases(), which doesn't take complain flags, so wherever that check fails, it's always a hard error. I suppose the checking function call chains that go to that function should

[Bug tree-optimization/51049] A regression caused by "Improve handling of conditional-branches on targets with high branch costs"

2016-01-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51049 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this has been fixed or at least for most cases. That is the & part is redone during the combineif pass.

[Bug target/45927] autoconf regression wrt .quad availability targeting amd64 from biarch cross compiler

2016-01-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45927 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Does this still happen in GCC 5?

[Bug libstdc++/69092] [4.9/5/6 Regression] basic_string constructor and throwing iterators

2016-01-06 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69092 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.3 Summary|basic_string

[Bug bootstrap/38866] [Regression] --enable-gstreamer-peer + multilib + 32 bit boot = broken build

2016-01-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38866 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/68629] FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-simd-3.c

2016-01-06 Thread thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68629 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Preud'homme --- It does fix it for arm-none-eabi targets, the test is now unsupported. I should have done it myself. Jakub was talking about moving it in the cilk-plus directory. Do you think it's still necessary?

[Bug other/68813] [openacc] lto1: internal compiler error: in input_varpool_node, at lto-cgraph.c

2016-01-06 Thread cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68813 --- Comment #5 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cesar Date: Thu Jan 7 03:28:05 2016 New Revision: 232121 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232121&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR other/68813 gcc/ * omp-low.c (is_oac

[Bug bootstrap/69123] [6 Regression] --with-build-config='bootstrap-O3 bootstrap-debug' miscompiled stage 2

2016-01-06 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69123 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/69179] New: undocumented darwin attributes "apple_kext_compatibility" and "weak_import"

2016-01-06 Thread sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69179 Bug ID: 69179 Summary: undocumented darwin attributes "apple_kext_compatibility" and "weak_import" Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug target/62273] doc: Invoke.texi -mkernel mentions undocumented option

2016-01-06 Thread sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62273 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/63192] non-mutable lambda capture by value on reference does not apply const

2016-01-06 Thread lichray at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63192 Zhihao Yuan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lichray at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug c++/63192] non-mutable lambda capture by value on reference does not apply const

2016-01-06 Thread lichray at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63192 --- Comment #4 from Zhihao Yuan --- (In reply to Zhihao Yuan from comment #3) > Confirmed, please fix. As the standardization of `std::as_const`, this bug > becomes significant. Never mind, I will create another bug report to demonstrate my iss

[Bug c++/66735] [C++14] lambda init-capture fails for const references

2016-01-06 Thread lichray at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66735 Zhihao Yuan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lichray at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug middle-end/68983] [6 Regression] ICE: in store_field, at expr.c:6659

2016-01-06 Thread lucdanton at free dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68983 lucdanton at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lucdanton at free dot fr --- C

[Bug boehm-gc/66848] boehm-gc fails test suite on x86_64-apple-darwin15

2016-01-06 Thread egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu --- Comment

[Bug target/62273] doc: Invoke.texi -mkernel mentions undocumented option

2016-01-06 Thread egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62273 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/68983] [6 Regression] ICE: in store_field, at expr.c:6659

2016-01-06 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68983 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to lucdanton from comment #6) > I've independently run into this bug and applying this patch to HEAD doesn't > help on my end, the same ICE happens (except it is now pointing to line 6660 > of > co

[Bug middle-end/68983] [6 Regression] ICE: in store_field, at expr.c:6659

2016-01-06 Thread lucdanton at free dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68983 --- Comment #8 from lucdanton at free dot fr --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #7) > (In reply to lucdanton from comment #6) > > I've independently run into this bug and applying this patch to HEAD doesn't > > help on my end, the same IC

<    1   2