https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69083
Bug ID: 69083
Summary: ICE at -O3 in 64-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu
(verify_gimple failed)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69083
--- Comment #1 from Chengnian Sun ---
This also fails in -m32.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69084
Bug ID: 69084
Summary: lra-remat.c:165: dead function ?
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69085
Bug ID: 69085
Summary: gcc/emit-rtl.c:2671: dead function ?
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69086
Bug ID: 69086
Summary: crealf may be invalid value
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69087
Bug ID: 69087
Summary: e500v2 cross compiler skips assignment of double local
variable in large stack frame
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69088
Bug ID: 69088
Summary: type conversion to int
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69089
Bug ID: 69089
Summary: C++11: alignas(0) causes an error
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69089
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt ---
Created attachment 37194
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37194&action=edit
ChangeLog for patch
A patch is attached to the previous message.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43589
tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69087
--- Comment #1 from mavik at outlook dot com.au ---
The problem does not exist in version 4.8.1.
$
/opt/eldk-5.5.3/powerpc-e500v2/sysroots/i686-eldk-linux/usr/bin/powerpc-linux-gnuspe/powerpc-linux-gnuspe-gcc
-v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69090
Bug ID: 69090
Summary: Allocatable arrays mishandled in 'omp declare target'
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69090
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69088
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69091
Bug ID: 69091
Summary: valid code with operator| causes ICE "tree check:
accessed elt 2 of tree_vec with 1 elts in tsubst, at
cp/pt.c:12851"
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69090
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov ---
I've assigned 'fortran' category to the bug because "allocatable arrays" are
specific to Fortran, and the gfortran front-end already does some processing of
allocatable arrays for OpenMP directives. I wou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69092
Bug ID: 69092
Summary: basic_string constructor and throwing iterators
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69093
Bug ID: 69093
Summary: implement -fmacro-backtrace-limit
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: preprocess
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68948
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53871
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69092
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53871
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #6)
> Derived from the current Linux kernel:
>
> // i never changes, so the code loops forever.
>
> extern int f2( int);
>
> void f1()
> {
> int i = 0;
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69087
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69086
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69094
Bug ID: 69094
Summary: erroneous demangling
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69083
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Component|rtl-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69084
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68987
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=232004
Committed to /branches/gcc-5-branch
Test case will be committed shortly.
.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69085
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69089
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patches should be sent to gcc-patches@.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67081
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69094
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53871
--- Comment #8 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> The above loop is not so obvious an infinite loop at all. Since f2 is not
> declared as pure/const, GCC can think the return value changes without the
> argume
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69091
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69090
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68987
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Dec 30 22:10:13 2015
New Revision: 232007
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232007&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-30 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/68987
* gfortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69095
Bug ID: 69095
Summary: internal compiler error: in dependent_type_p, at
cp/pt.c:19399
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68987
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Dec 30 22:32:34 2015
New Revision: 232008
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232008&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-30 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/68987
* gfortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69096
Bug ID: 69096
Summary: [concepts] return type deduction before checking
constraint satisfaction
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68668
--- Comment #7 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Thu Dec 31 00:24:59 2015
New Revision: 232014
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232014&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport PR c/68668 patch to fix PR c/69037.
gcc/c:
PR c/69037
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69037
--- Comment #5 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Thu Dec 31 00:24:59 2015
New Revision: 232014
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232014&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport PR c/68668 patch to fix PR c/69037.
gcc/c:
PR c/69037
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69037
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69075
--- Comment #4 from Mikhail Maltsev ---
Somewhat reduced testcase:
$ cat test2.cc
using Timer_Probe = int;
struct A {
Timer_Probe probe;
};
struct Gateway_Order_Probe : A {
using Body = A;
Gateway_Order_Probe() : Body{} {}
};
struct Back
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69097
Bug ID: 69097
Summary: wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69098
Bug ID: 69098
Summary: Member function template flagged with 'is not a
function template'
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
URL: http://melpon.org/wandbox/permlink/DShqHOB
46 matches
Mail list logo
