-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /work2/gcc-x86_64/gcc-src/configure --enable-languages=c,c++
--prefix=/work2/gcc-x86_64/local --disable-bootstrap CXXFLAGS=-O0
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20151222 (experimental) (GCC)
$ ld -v
GNU ld version 2.25-9.f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Created attachment 37097 [details]
> gcc6-pr68860-lto.patch
>
> I've noticed that the new tests still fail with LTO.
> It seems the reason is that LTO ignores DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69007
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69005
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69009
Bug ID: 69009
Summary: ICE in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:21511
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60756
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Dec 22 09:51:02 2015
New Revision: 231897
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231897&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/60756
* var-tracking.c (tracked_record_parame
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60756
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69008
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68756
--- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha ---
The following observations were made w/ gcc-6.0.0-alpha20151220 snapshot.
isl fails w/
> isl-0.15/isl_ctx.c:227: Assertion "ctx->ref > 0" failed
when compiling the following snippet w/ the same options as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68999
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The patch also causes bootstrap failure on alpha-linux-gnu native bootstrap.
Reverting the patch allows bootstrap to finish.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69009
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69009
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Dropping "volatile" here "solves" the issue:
template auto const tuple_size_v =
tuple_size_v;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59768
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes it should be inline, I'll fix it, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
--- Comment #23 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, difficult. I'm conscious that this is stage 3, and worried about adding
too much complexity, especially if we're writing code that we'd eventually drop
in favour of a more complete framewor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69010
Bug ID: 69010
Summary: Boolean vector constant with a scalar mode is expanded
incorrectly
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59768
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Dec 22 11:37:07 2015
New Revision: 231900
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231900&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add inline to std::__invfwd
PR libstdc++/59768
* include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69011
Bug ID: 69011
Summary: [OOP] ICE in gfc_advance_chain for ALLOCATE with
SOURCE
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67376
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
-linux --with-pkgversion=gcc
20151222 commit: gcc-trunk-231896
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69012
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69013
Bug ID: 69013
Summary: gfortran-5.3.0 ICE in
prune_uninit_phi_opnds_in_unrealizable_paths, at
tree-ssa-uninit.c:1121
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69013
--- Comment #1 from George N. White III ---
Created attachment 37105
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37105&action=edit
log file for test compile
Compile command:
/opt/local/bin/gfortran-mp-5 -v --save-temps -fPIC -fno-range
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69009
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(gdb) l
21505 if (tmpl != gen_tmpl)
21506 /* We should already have the extra args. */
21507 gcc_assert (TMPL_PARMS_DEPTH (DECL_TEMPLATE_PARMS (gen_tmpl))
21508 == TMP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67376
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37103|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69009
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69009
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69007
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68973
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69013
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69011
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69002
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Dec 22 15:23:21 2015
New Revision: 231902
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231902&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/69002
* c-typeck.c (build_component_ref): Warn whe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69002
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68937
--- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Dec 22 15:38:25 2015
New Revision: 231903
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231903&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH] Use call-clobbered register for sibcall via GOT
From: H.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68964
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson ---
The path on which this test goes off the rails is supposed to only
be used for structure assignments, where memmove must be used, and
thus taking the address of both sides of the assignment will work.
Ho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69013
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68964
--- Comment #4 from Richard Henderson ---
Oh, yes, duh.
These vector types are (at least partially) target-specific, and so the
function definitions are left for the target to fill in at startup time.
See config/i386/i386.c bdesc_tm for MMX/SSE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69014
Bug ID: 69014
Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/991023-1.c
FAILs with -Os -fmodulo-sched -fno-tree-vrp
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68999
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 37108
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37108&action=edit
Proposed patch
There is a logic error in Honza's patch. The part in memrefs_conflict_p should
be changed to:
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68999
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69011
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69014
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69015
Bug ID: 69015
Summary: ICE: RTL check: expected code 'code_label', have
'return' in find_cond_trap, at ifcvt.c:3715 with
-fno-if-conversion and __builtin_trap()
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69016
Bug ID: 69016
Summary: In C++14 standard, function with auto as return and
arguments returns result with the datatype of first
argument only
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67376
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
As for the non-NULL checks,
struct A { int e[2]; };
constexpr A a { { 0, 1 } };
static_assert (a.e != 0, "");
static_assert (&a.e[1] != 0, "");
static_assert (&a.e[2] != 0, "");
static_assert (a.e + 1 != 0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69016
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69016
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
N.B. this is not actually valid according to the C++ standard. C++14 only
supports auto for the return type, not the parameters. Using placeholder types
for the parameters as well is defined by the Concepts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68872
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69017
Bug ID: 69017
Summary: [cilkplus] ICE with valid cilk_spawn
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69018
Bug ID: 69018
Summary: libitm/testsuite/libitm.c++/c++.exp: libstdc++ include
paths don't work if tests set options
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69015
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69018
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69017
--- Comment #1 from ryan.burn at gmail dot com ---
Better example:
struct B {
};
B f() { return {}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68772
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Tue Dec 22 19:27:14 2015
New Revision: 231905
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231905&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/68772
* config/rs6000/rs6000.h (ASM_CPU_S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69019
Bug ID: 69019
Summary: [5 regression] Failure of test case
gcc.target/powerpc/ti_math1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68872
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67811
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson ---
Author: rth
Date: Tue Dec 22 19:42:24 2015
New Revision: 231907
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231907&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/67811
* gimple.h (struct gtransaction): Add label_norm,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68617
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67376
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 22 20:47:58 2015
New Revision: 231909
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231909&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67376
* fold-const.c (size_low_cst): Removed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67376
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The first issue should be fixed for GCC 6+ already, the other one needs further
fixes. As for backporting this to GCC 5 branch, I think it should be done only
after a few weeks on the trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68772
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Tue Dec 22 20:51:12 2015
New Revision: 231910
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231910&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
PR target/68772
* co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68772
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Tue Dec 22 20:52:40 2015
New Revision: 231911
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231911&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
PR target/68772
* co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68872
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner ---
Fix backported to gcc-5-branch and gcc-4_0-branch too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68872
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69020
Bug ID: 69020
Summary: wrong ADL for attribute cleanup functions
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69020
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69021
Bug ID: 69021
Summary: [cilkplus] valid cilk_spawn won't compile when
invoking non-trivial assignment operator
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69020
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
I agree, but as long as the feature is exposed to users it seems that it should
work in unsurprising ways (i.e., follow the C++ lookup rules). Otherwise, if
we don't want C++ programmers to use it, a possible
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67339
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Dec 22 21:46:38 2015
New Revision: 231912
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231912&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67339
* parser.c (cp_parser_elaborated_type_specifi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67257
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Dec 22 21:46:44 2015
New Revision: 231913
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231913&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67257
* parser.c (cp_parser_single_declaration): Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66921
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Dec 22 21:46:50 2015
New Revision: 231914
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231914&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66921
* decl.c (cp_complete_array_type): Allow an i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67339
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Dec 22 21:49:18 2015
New Revision: 231916
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231916&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67339
* parser.c (cp_parser_elaborated_type_specifi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66921
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Dec 22 21:49:25 2015
New Revision: 231917
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231917&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66921
* decl.c (cp_complete_array_type): Allow an i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473
--- Comment #11 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Dec 22 22:27:45 2015
New Revision: 231919
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231919&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/68473: sanitize source range-printing within certain macro expans
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473
--- Comment #12 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #11)
> Author: dmalcolm
> Date: Tue Dec 22 22:27:45 2015
> New Revision: 231919
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231919&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
> PR c/68473:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68917
--- Comment #4 from Chen Gang ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #3)
> by the way, did you have also trouble to build the
> libgcc multilib configuration or did you --disable-multilib?
> this seems completely broken too...
Yes, I did.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68541
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So a couple updates.
First the path splitting code has been moved to -O3 and above so anyone trying
to reproduce would need to use -O2 -fsplit-paths.
The unnecessary duplication pointed out by Richi has be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69022
Bug ID: 69022
Summary: attribute vector_size ignored with dependent bytes
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69022
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35758
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69023
Bug ID: 69023
Summary: bitset whose name is used in constant-expression
rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69024
Bug ID: 69024
Summary: [cilkpus] cilk_spawn is broken for initializations
with implicit conversion operators defined
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69023
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69023
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
I'm not sure. I did read the relevant text in the C++ and C standards and I
can't say I see a clear answer. But then it rarely seems to be in these corner
cases.
GCC (in C mode) accepts the code. All other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69025
Bug ID: 69025
Summary: df-scan.c:2536 warning: array su bscript is above
array bounds
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
-linux/bin
--with-pkgversion=gcc 20151222 commit: gcc-trunk-231896
This may be help to reproduced。
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69026
Bug ID: 69026
Summary: dwarf2out.c:4295 warning:
‘finder[...]addr_table_entry_struct_union::label’ may
be used uninitialized
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69015
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu |powerpc*-*-linux-gnu
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58109
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68966
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Patch posted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg02075.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69022
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Patch posted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg02074.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52272
wuxiang at iscas dot ac.cn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wuxiang at iscas dot ac.cn
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69027
Bug ID: 69027
Summary: SPARC: Missing optimization for fall through functions
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Co
92 matches
Mail list logo
