[Bug rtl-optimization/65980] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure building Linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65980 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 16 08:04:31 2015 New Revision: 231672 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231672&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/65980 * jump.c (rtx_renumbered_equal_p

[Bug c++/68929] GCC hangs in nested template instantiations even after static_assert fails.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68929 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, memory-hog

[Bug tree-optimization/67781] [5/6 Regression] wrong code generated on big-endian with -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67781 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Preud'homme --- I have a patch that seems to be working. Running regression testing and bootstrap now.

[Bug ipa/68930] Aggregate replacements not applied to inline function bodies.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68930 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug target/68923] SSE/AVX movq load (_mm_cvtsi64_si128) not being folded into pmovzx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68923 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/68928] AVX loops on unaligned arrays could generate more efficient startup/cleanup code when peeling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68928 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||53947 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biene

[Bug libstdc++/68921] [5/6 Regression] std::future::wait() makes invalid futex calls and spins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68921 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.4

[Bug rtl-optimization/68920] [6 Regression] Undesirable if-conversion for a rarely taken branch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68920 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug c++/68922] [4.9/5 Regression] g++ fails to generate code for catch clause with specific optimizations enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68922 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68184] [4.9/5 Regression] Exception from a virtual function does not get caught

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68184 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alban.lefebvre at gmail dot com --- Com

[Bug tree-optimization/68919] Null-pointer store not removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68919 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/68162] [5 Regression] Incompatible pointer type using a typedef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68162 --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Dec 16 09:07:45 2015 New Revision: 231673 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231673&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-12-16 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug rtl-optimization/68636] [5 Regression] unnecessary unaligned load on mips o32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68636 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Dec 16 09:07:45 2015 New Revision: 231673 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231673&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-12-16 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug other/68899] [6 Regression] Invalid read of size: 3 occurences in get_line_width_without_trailing_whitespace (diagnostic-show-locus.c:413)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68899 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/68910] [5/6 regression] huge stack frame and poor code with instruction scheduling at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68910 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target|sparc-rtems |sparc-*-* Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/68910] [5/6 regression] huge stack frame and poor code with instruction scheduling at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68910 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/68910] [5/6 regression] huge stack frame and poor code with instruction scheduling at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68910 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- I have the huge stack frame with the 4.9.x compiler too so the spilling effect itself is probably not new.

[Bug tree-optimization/68892] [6 Regression] Excessive dead loads produced by BB vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68892 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68892] [6 Regression] Excessive dead loads produced by BB vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68892 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Dec 16 09:21:04 2015 New Revision: 231674 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231674&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-12-16 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/68892

[Bug target/68910] [5/6 regression] huge stack frame and poor code with instruction scheduling at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68910 --- Comment #6 from Sebastian Huber --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #5) > I have the huge stack frame with the 4.9.x compiler too so the spilling > effect itself is probably not new. Yes, sorry for imprecise known-to-work information

[Bug c++/68763] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_unstripped_args, at cp/pt.c:1132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68763 --- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- There is also this bogus error, before the ICE: In file included from /usr/include/boost/xpressive/match_results.hpp:59:0, from /usr/include/boost/xpressive/detail/core/access.hpp:21,

[Bug middle-end/68870] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/68933] New: ICE when mixing "-fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage" and "-fcoarray=lib"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68933 Bug ID: 68933 Summary: ICE when mixing "-fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage" and "-fcoarray=lib" Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/68841] [6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr59358.c FAILs with custom compiler flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68841 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #6 from ktk

[Bug target/68934] New: ARM using simd types should be rejected if not fpu=neon

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68934 Bug ID: 68934 Summary: ARM using simd types should be rejected if not fpu=neon Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug c++/67669] Wrong works fwrite or fread or both

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67669 --- Comment #4 from Bernard --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3) > I don't have access to a Windows machine and I can't confirm this on Linux, > but > I doubt the problem is due to GCC and suspect it's more likely due to some > bug/odd

[Bug c/68908] inefficient code for _Atomic operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68908 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/68648] [4.9/5/6 Regression][ARM] ICE: fail to generate BIC(immediate) instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68648 --- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Wed Dec 16 10:01:48 2015 New Revision: 231675 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231675&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] PR target/68648: Fold NOT of CONST_INT in andsi_iors

[Bug target/68934] [ARM] using simd types should be rejected if not fpu=neon

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68934 --- Comment #1 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- run with cc1 -mfloat-abi=hard for a compiler configured with defaults

[Bug c++/68726] ice: tree check: expected tree_vec, have error_mark in comp_template_args_with_info, at cp/pt.c:7890

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68726 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/68723] ice in pop_nested_namespace, at cp/name-lookup.c:3816

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68723 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/68724] ice in unify, at cp/pt.c:19902

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68724 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/68934] [ARM] using simd types should be rejected if not fpu=neon

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68934 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/68935] New: ipa-cp.c changes cause guality test failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68935 Bug ID: 68935 Summary: ipa-cp.c changes cause guality test failures Product: gcc Version: 6.0 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg01083.htm l

[Bug debug/68860] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-1.c -O3 -g line 16 arg1 == 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Comme

[Bug testsuite/68935] ipa-cp.c changes cause guality test failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68935 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/68841] [6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr59358.c FAILs with custom compiler flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68841 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug libstdc++/68921] [5/6 Regression] std::future::wait() makes invalid futex calls and spins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68921 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Dec 16 10:40:04 2015 New Revision: 231676 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231676&root=gcc&view=rev Log: libstdc++/68921 add timeout argument to futex(2) PR libstdc++/68

[Bug c++/68936] New: [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected call_expr, have target_expr in build_min_non_dep_call_vec, at cp/tree.c:2744

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68936 Bug ID: 68936 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected call_expr, have target_expr in build_min_non_dep_call_vec, at cp/tree.c:2744 Product: gcc Version:

[Bug c++/68936] [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected call_expr, have target_expr in build_min_non_dep_call_vec, at cp/tree.c:2744

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68936 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/68861] [6 regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla8.f90 -O3 -g execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68861 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|law at redh

[Bug c++/68184] [4.9/5 Regression] Exception from a virtual function does not get caught

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68184 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Dec 16 11:12:06 2015 New Revision: 231677 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231677&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-12-16 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug c++/68184] [4.9 Regression] Exception from a virtual function does not get caught

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68184 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.4.0, 6.0 Summary|[4.9/5 Re

[Bug target/68937] New: i686: -fno-plt produces wrong code (maybe only with tailcall)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68937 Bug ID: 68937 Summary: i686: -fno-plt produces wrong code (maybe only with tailcall) Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug c++/68936] [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected call_expr, have target_expr in build_min_non_dep_call_vec, at cp/tree.c:2744

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68936 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug libstdc++/68921] [5/6 Regression] std::future::wait() makes invalid futex calls and spins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68921 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Dec 16 11:48:55 2015 New Revision: 231679 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231679&root=gcc&view=rev Log: libstdc++/68921 add timeout argument to futex(2) PR libstdc++/68

[Bug libstdc++/68921] [5/6 Regression] std::future::wait() makes invalid futex calls and spins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68921 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68926] decltype and sfinae to check for template instance availability fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68926 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCON

[Bug testsuite/68914] [6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr45752.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68914 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/68916] [6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-4.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68916 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Dec 16 12:13:05 2015 New Revision: 231684 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231684&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-12-16 Richard Biener PR testsuite/68916 PR tes

[Bug testsuite/68914] [6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr45752.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68914 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Dec 16 12:13:05 2015 New Revision: 231684 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231684&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-12-16 Richard Biener PR testsuite/68916 PR tes

[Bug testsuite/68914] [6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr45752.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68914 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68916] [6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-4.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68916 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68934] [ARM] using simd types should be rejected if not fpu=neon

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68934 --- Comment #3 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Real code does not scope simd type definitions tightly enough to make this > feasible even if it were desirable. there was an instance of this in Bug #68895. The second function ices while using

[Bug ipa/68930] Aggregate replacements not applied to inline function bodies.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68930 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68930 > > Jan Hubicka changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug c++/68926] [4.9/5/6 Regression] decltype and sfinae to check for template instance availability fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68926 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.4 Summary|decltype and

[Bug tree-optimization/68915] [6 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr46032.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68915 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/68915] [6 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr46032.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68915 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68915] [6 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr46032.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68915 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Dec 16 12:37:02 2015 New Revision: 231687 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231687&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-12-16 Richard Biener PR testsuite/68915 * gcc.

[Bug c/68162] [5 Regression] Incompatible pointer type using a typedef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68162 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/64439] Incorrect location of -Wunused-value or false negative

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64439 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug lto/61886] [4.9/5/6 Regression] LTO breaks fread with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/64783] -march=armv8.1-a should be supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64783 mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug target/64784] -march=native should be supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64784 Bug 64784 depends on bug 64783, which changed state. Bug 64783 Summary: -march=armv8.1-a should be supported https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64783 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug testsuite/66720] gcc.dg/vect/pr48052.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66720 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68937] i686: -fno-plt produces wrong code (maybe only with tailcall)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68937 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- There is static bool ix86_function_ok_for_sibcall (tree decl, tree exp) { tree type, decl_or_type; rtx a, b; /* If we are generating position-independent code, we cannot sibcall optimize direct calls

[Bug target/68937] i686: -fno-plt produces wrong code (maybe only with tailcall)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68937 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/64637] Incorrect location for -Wunused-value warnings in for-loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64637 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug lto/61886] [4.9/5/6 Regression] LTO breaks fread with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/68619] [6 Regression] error: loop with header 6 not in loop tree

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68619 mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/68861] [6 regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla8.f90 -O3 -g execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68861 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Dec 16 13:45:40 2015 New Revision: 231689 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231689&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-12-16 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/68861

[Bug ipa/68857] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/mpx/vararg-8-nov.c -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68857 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68937] i686: -fno-plt produces wrong code (maybe only with tailcall)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68937 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > There is > > static bool > ix86_function_ok_for_sibcall (tree decl, tree exp) > { > tree type, decl_or_type; > rtx a, b; > > /* If we are generating position-indepen

[Bug c/44478] -Wunused- but-set-variable is incredible noisy in kernel builds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44478 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/68756] [6 Regression] ICE w/ -O1 -floop-nest-optimize and isl 0.15: isl-0.15/isl_id.c:213: unable to find id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68756 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/52050] Want an option to warn about a declaration inside a for/while/if statements.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52050 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/68912] Wrong value category used in _Bind functor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68912 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Dec 16 14:16:00 2015 New Revision: 231692 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231692&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix cv-qualifiers in std::bind invocation PR libstdc++/68912

[Bug target/68910] [5/6 regression] huge stack frame and poor code with instruction scheduling at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68910 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- > Yes, sorry for imprecise known-to-work information. The huge stack frame is > also in 4.3.2 (2792 bytes), but it got worse with every GCC release. OK, thanks for the information. I can easily bring back

[Bug target/67973] All the tests for -gstabs* fail on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with Xcode 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67973 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/67973] All the tests for -gstabs* fail on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with Xcode 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67973 --- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- Right: an initial version was posted to gcc-patches at the listed URL, but is currently being reworked. I usually only attach patches if they are not yet ready for posting. Rai

[Bug go/68931] gccgo fails to build using MUSL libc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68931 --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor --- I don't understand your patch, because I don't understand where CONFIG_USE_MUSL gets set. It also seems like the wrong approach. The basic goal of configure tests is to test for features, not systems. m

[Bug target/68937] i686: -fno-plt produces wrong code (maybe only with tailcall)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68937 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com Host|x8

[Bug c++/68938] New: [C++11] use of lambda before deduction of auto does not fail in templated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68938 Bug ID: 68938 Summary: [C++11] use of lambda before deduction of auto does not fail in templated function Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug fortran/67044] ICE: in aggregate_value_p, at function.c:2068

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67044 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug target/67973] All the tests for -gstabs* fail on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with Xcode 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67973 --- Comment #13 from Bernd Schmidt --- Oh, there's a URL field. Never saw that one before. Sorry for the noise.

[Bug tree-optimization/68861] [6 regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla8.f90 -O3 -g execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68861 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68619] [6 Regression] error: loop with header 6 not in loop tree

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68619 Bug 68619 depends on bug 68861, which changed state. Bug 68861 Summary: [6 regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla8.f90 -O3 -g execution test https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68861 What|Removed |Ad

[Bug lto/68902] --as-needed consider library as unneeded even when library have __init functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68902 --- Comment #2 from Коренберг Марк --- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19372

[Bug middle-end/68870] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Dec 16 14:56:10 2015 New Revision: 231695 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231695&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-12-16 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/68870

[Bug middle-end/68870] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68696] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/vbslq_u64_1.c scan-assembler-times bif\\tv 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68696 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug target/68696] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/vbslq_u64_1.c scan-assembler-times bif\\tv 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68696 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Wed Dec 16 15:03:44 2015 New Revision: 231696 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231696&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [AArch64] PR target/68696 FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/vbslq_u

[Bug c++/68939] ICE or wrong code with OpenMP privatization of reference to VLAs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68939 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/68939] New: ICE or wrong code with OpenMP privatization of reference to VLAs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68939 Bug ID: 68939 Summary: ICE or wrong code with OpenMP privatization of reference to VLAs Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/67509] [6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_7.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67509 --- Comment #7 from Bill Seurer --- It does not appear this patch was ever submitted as this test is still failing.

[Bug target/66785] internal compiler error in record_operand_use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66785 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/67044] ICE: in aggregate_value_p, at function.c:2068

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67044 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug c++/67050] [C++14] ICE when calling a template member function from a lambda with implicit "this" capture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67050 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/67050] [C++14] ICE when calling a template member function from a lambda with implicit "this" capture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67050 --- Comment #5 from Louis Dionne --- Agreed, the ICE seems to be fixed on trunk. However, the error you're getting is still a bug, right? The code compiles if I use `this->X()`, but not `X()` alone.

[Bug target/67808] LRA ICEs on simple double to long double conversion test case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67808 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

  1   2   3   >