https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68730
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 14 08:04:37 2015
New Revision: 231606
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231606&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/68730
* cfgrtl.c (cfg_layout_finalize)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68889
Bug ID: 68889
Summary: Fortran/DWARF: Possible bug in the handling of
DW_AT_associated
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68775
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Note that I can't reproduce the bogus dump with current trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68890
Bug ID: 68890
Summary: [5.3 Regression] ICE in verify_ctor_sanity, at
cp/constexpr.c:2113
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68890
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66616
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Dec 14 09:33:12 2015
New Revision: 231607
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231607&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 66616] Check for thunks when adding extra constants to clones
2015-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68885
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68857
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68857
--- Comment #2 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Here is a smaller reproducer:
__builtin_va_list a;
void foo (int *p1, ...)
{
__builtin_va_start(a, p1);
}
void test() { foo(0); }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68891
Bug ID: 68891
Summary: must use a typedef to declare a conversion to 'double
(&)[3]'
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68775
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, it became latent only. Testing the following fix:
Index: gcc/tree-vect-slp.c
===
--- gcc/tree-vect-slp.c (revision 230855)
+++ gcc/tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68878
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68862
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68861
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68866
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68866
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68187
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68857
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68890
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68887
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68881
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68887
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67973
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68841
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I suspect that more aggressive if-conversion is exposing a bug in another RTL
pass. If-conversion creates:
(insn 22 21 73 7 (set (reg:CCGC 17 flags)
(compare:CCGC (reg/v:SI 88 [ i ])
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68841
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The testcase built with -fno-live-range-shrinkage works ok.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68880
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
For future reference, [4.9 Regression] means a regression in gcc 4.9 compared
to previous versions. What you meant is [5/6 Regression], and you should have
put 4.9.4 (or another version) in the "Known to wo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68833
--- Comment #4 from Franz Sirl ---
The fix in Comment 3 works fine for me. No testsuite regressions and also the
application where I spotted this compiles/warns as expected now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68890
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68763
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68417
Alexander Fomin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #8 from Alexander F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68892
Bug ID: 68892
Summary: [6 Regression] Excessive dead loads produced by BB
vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68892
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68893
Bug ID: 68893
Summary: [Coarray] Wrong result with -fcoarray=single and
EVENTS
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Thanks Markus for reduction of the test-case.
For the minimized test, the constrop clone has properly unset a comdat group.
Comdat group for the node:
_ZNK1G20isFormControlElementEv.constprop.0/10 () @0x7fff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68880
--- Comment #5 from David Ward ---
Jonathan, the behavior changed between 4.8 and 4.9. Testing with the 4.9
release showed the new behavior as well. I showed the output from the latest
release to demonstrate that the behavior still exists and had
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68894
Bug ID: 68894
Summary: Recognition min/max pattern with multiple arguments.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68857
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich ---
IPA CP redirects edges for all callers including instrumentation thunks.
Instrumentation thunks are always supposed to call their original nodes and
therefore should be skipped.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68894
--- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Created attachment 37026
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37026&action=edit
test-case to reproduce
It is sufficient to compile it with -O3 option to see the difference in
produced assem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038
--- Comment #32 from Joshua Kinard ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #30)
> Any status update? Does bootstrap work on trunk (with --disable-checking)?
Okay, here's updates from the MIPS angle on a few configurations:
MIPS-IV, Big-en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68799
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose ---
> Can you please delete the line
>
> dump_incr_vec ();
>
> from that patch and try again?
installed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68880
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I see, sorry, I read "The output below is from gcc 5.3.0, but I just checked
that it is still broken in SVN trunk" to mean it was ok in 4.9
Then it should have been "[4.9/5/6 Regression]" (and all regressi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67781
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66688
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45859
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918
Bug 18918 depends on bug 45859, which changed state.
Bug 45859 Summary: [Coarray, F2008, IR] Rejects valid actuals to coarray dummies
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45859
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39627
Bug 39627 depends on bug 45859, which changed state.
Bug 45859 Summary: [Coarray, F2008, IR] Rejects valid actuals to coarray dummies
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45859
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67484
--- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Dec 14 13:21:43 2015
New Revision: 231614
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231614&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2015-12-11 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67484
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.0 |5.4
--- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609
--- Comment #40 from James Greenhalgh ---
Author: jgreenhalgh
Date: Mon Dec 14 13:31:08 2015
New Revision: 231615
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231615&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport: [Patch AArch64] Reinstate CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68775
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 14 13:42:03 2015
New Revision: 231617
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231617&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-14 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/68775
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68492
Bug 68492 depends on bug 68775, which changed state.
Bug 68775 Summary: [6 Regression] spec2006 test case 465.tonto fails with the
gcc 6.0 fortran compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68775
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68775
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66688
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
Bug 58315 depends on bug 66688, which changed state.
Bug 66688 Summary: [6 Regression] compare debug failure building Linux kernel
on ppc64le
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66688
What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67781
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
So after performing the symbolic computation, the result is: 0x04030201 with 01
being the byte represented by b. This is correct so far and n->range shows 5
since 5 bytes have been touched. However, the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68871
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66688
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67781
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
The exact place where it goes wrong is in find_bswap_or_nop (not the _1 helper
function) in the following line:
for (tmpn = n->n, rsize = 0; tmpn; tmpn >>= BITS_PER_MARKER, rsize++);
This code re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66688
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Created attachment 37027 [details]
> gcc6-pr66688.patch
>
> I think this just went latent with those changes. The problem I see is that
> cleanup_control_flow_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68894
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66688
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> > Created attachment 37027 [details]
> > gcc6-pr66688.patch
> >
> > I think this just went latent with those chang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68894
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Doing this in a classical way in phi-opt might end up being slightly
convoluted.
So I'd propose to try to utilize match-and-simplify by adding
(cond (ge @0 @1) (max:s @0 @2) (max:s @1 @2))
-> (max (max @0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68629
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68820
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68187
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #1)
[...]
> in crypto/engine/eng_lib.c:
>
> int engine_free_util(ENGINE *e, int locked)
> {
> int i;
>
> if (e == NULL) {
> ENGINEerr(ENGINE_F_ENGIN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The right (TM) fix:
Index: gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c
===
--- gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c (revision 231617)
+++ gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c (workin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66688
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> > > Created attachment 37027 [details]
> > > gcc6-pr66688.patch
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68893
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
event post ( event_value_has_been_set)
call event_query (event_value_has_been_set, cnt)
translates into:
integer(kind=4) event_value_has_been_set;
event_value_has_been_set = event_value_has_bee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68895
Bug ID: 68895
Summary: [ARM] ICE with target attributes
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68852
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 14 15:26:24 2015
New Revision: 231619
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231619&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-14 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/68852
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68852
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 14 15:33:20 2015
New Revision: 231620
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231620&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-10 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/68707
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67323
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 14 15:33:20 2015
New Revision: 231620
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231620&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-10 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/68707
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
>
> --- Comment #10 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> slp-perm-11.c: a 16-iterat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
--- Comment #13 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmmm, I realize a "definite" codegen improvement was maybe a bad choice of
wording. A "substantial" (albeit uncertain!) improvement, may have been more
accurate...
However, yes it looks like we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68895
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #12)
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
> >
> > --- Comment #10 from alalaw01 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
So explicit like
+ /* If the loads and stores can be handled with load/store-lane
+ instructions do not generate this SLP instance. */
+ if (is_a (vinfo)
+ && loads_permuted
+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68896
Bug ID: 68896
Summary: [ARM] target attribute ignored
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68896
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to alalaw01 from comment #13)
> Hmmm, I realize a "definite" codegen improvement was maybe a bad choice of
> wording. A "substantial" (albeit uncertain!) improvement, may have been more
> accurate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68897
Bug ID: 68897
Summary: No option to disable just "warning: enumeral and
non-enumeral type in conditional expression"
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68796
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68865
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Mon Dec 14 16:13:33 2015
New Revision: 231621
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231621&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix a mistake in cstore_si_as_di (PR68865, PR68879)
convert
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68879
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Mon Dec 14 16:13:33 2015
New Revision: 231621
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231621&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix a mistake in cstore_si_as_di (PR68865, PR68879)
convert
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68898
Bug ID: 68898
Summary: ICE if rtl if-conversion is off.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68898
--- Comment #2 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Forgot to add stack trace:
Error: dominator of 6 status unknown
t2.f:41:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0xb4e62f crash_signal
/export/users/gnutester/stability/svn/trunk/gcc/toplev.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68898
--- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Created attachment 37028
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37028&action=edit
test-case to reproduce
Need to compile with -O2 -m32 -ffast-math options to reproduce. Note that
32-bit and -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68865
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68844
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
Jeff, thanks very much for the detailed analysis!
Bill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66616
--- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Dec 14 16:31:26 2015
New Revision: 231622
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231622&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 66616] Check for thunks when adding extra constants to clones
2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68187
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #2)
> Thanks; this is visible in full at:
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/crypto/engine/eng_lib.c#L116
>
> Looking at
> https://github.com/openssl/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68787
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66688
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 37030
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37030&action=edit
gcc6-pr66688.patch
So do you prefer this instead?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68833
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 14 16:59:05 2015
New Revision: 231624
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231624&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/68833
* common.opt (Wmissing-noreturn): Add Warning o
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
