https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68843
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger ---
hmm, yes.
the registers are named "st" "st(1)" "st(2)" .. "st(7)"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68850
Bug ID: 68850
Summary: Coarray events: EVENT_QUERY not documented as
intrinsic subroutine
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68847
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68844
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68841
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68832
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #4 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68841
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka ---
the statement:
else if (i == 3)
k = 12;
is not evaluated; in iteration 3, k == 8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66551
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68649
--- Comment #11 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #10)
> This PR is tagged as a regression. Has anyone determined when it last
> worked or is it longstanding bug uncovered by recent non-fortran fe changes?
For
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64132
li xin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lixin.fnst at cn dot
fujitsu.com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
Bug ID: 68851
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: in set_comdat_group, at
ipa-comdats.c:213
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64132
--- Comment #7 from li xin ---
(In reply to li xin from comment #6)
> The LSB test cases also Failed.
> /22_locale/messages/members/char/2.cc 1
> /22_locale/messages/members/char/wrapped_env.cc 1
> /22_locale/messages/members/char/wrapped_locale.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68820
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68849
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68852
Bug ID: 68852
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in vect_is_simple_use
(tree-vect-stmts.c:8750) using -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68064
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
The issue seems to be fixed. Not sure what revision fixed it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68852
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67484
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Dec 11 10:59:29 2015
New Revision: 231556
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231556&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR target/67484
Uros Bizjak
PR target/67484
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68853
Bug ID: 68853
Summary: [6 Regression] gcc-6 miscompiles Chromium v8 garbage
collector
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68846
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68850
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68064
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Dec 11 11:27:11 2015
New Revision: 231559
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231559&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add an asssert and testcase for PR 68064
2015-12-11 Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64818
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68853
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68064
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68842
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68636
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68842
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And interestingly EDG compiles it without error!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67992
Jan Stancek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.stancek at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68744
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Is this PR fixed by revision r231485?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68139
--- Comment #3 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ville
Date: Fri Dec 11 12:04:23 2015
New Revision: 231562
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231562&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/68139
Added:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/18_s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68139
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Still reducing. But Martin emailed me a patch, that fixes the issue:
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-comdats.c b/gcc/ipa-comdats.c
index 3aabd71..f7a6ff4 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-comdats.c
+++ b/gcc/ipa-comdats.c
@@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Caused by r231540:
commit 15a1fce36358508909f2013fd6d07e0b9fcad97a
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Dec 10 19:20:14 2015 +
* ipa-cp.c (ipcp_cloning_candidate_p): Use node->optimize_for_size_p.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68853
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
g++ -MMD -MF
obj/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/layout/webcore_rendering.LayoutObject.o.d
-DV8_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS -DCLD_VERSION=2 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DDISABLE_NACL
-DCHROMIUM_BUILD -DUI_COMPOSITOR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
So the mentioned revision is responsible for creation of a new consprop clone:
IPA decision stage:
...
- Creating a specialized node of virtual bool
blink::HTMLFormControlElement::isFormControlElement() cons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68842
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
--- a/gcc/cp/typeck.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
@@ -4907,8 +4907,13 @@ cp_build_binary_op (location_t location,
if (!result_type)
{
if (complain & tf_error)
- error ("invalid operands of ty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68853
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68853
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68775
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Summary|spec2006 test ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68775
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 36993
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36993&action=edit
candidate patch
Can you try if the fix for PR68852 (attached) fixes this?
If not, can you attach -fdump-tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68381
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68853
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Can you bisect it to the alias changes from Honza or is this older?
The first issue is older. At least a few weeks.
I don't have a powerful enough machine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68853
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #4)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> > Can you bisect it to the alias changes from Honza or is this older?
>
> The first issue is older. At
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67484
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68854
Bug ID: 68854
Summary: isystem and ansi cause arm assembly preprocessing
problem
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68775
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, it looks like a ppc64le cross happily (eh) accepts sources preprocessed on
x86_64-linux and even required built modules.
So I have the dump files myself and the -fopt-info-vec difference (for BB
vectori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68855
Bug ID: 68855
Summary: PAREN_EXPR not "ignored" where possible
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Testcase that is miscompiled starting with r210113 at -O2:
__attribute__((noinline, noclone)) unsigned __int128
foo (void)
{
unsigned __int128 x = (unsigned __int128) 0xULL;
struct { unsig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68775
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68543
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
After some discussion on IRC, WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS seems wrong for aarch64
since 32-bit operations i.e. in SImode operate like normal 32-bit operations
because they use the 32-bit W-form of t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Seems get_int_cst_ext_nunits already has some code to handle the case of
"negative" extra large integers, but only if they have precision multiple of
HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT. So I believe we want something f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68856
Bug ID: 68856
Summary: wrong compilation wtih character interoperability
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68853
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 36995
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36995&action=edit
unreduced testcase
Started with r226861.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
--- Comment #10 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This causes to FAIL the scan-tree-dump-times 'vectorizing stmts using SLP' in
slp-perm-{1,2,3,5,6,7,8,11}.c. Looking at the assembler before and after...
slp-perm-1.c: this looks a big win; sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35710
Jan-Benedict Glaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de
--- Comment #12 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33120
Jan-Benedict Glaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de
--- Comment #25 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35710
--- Comment #13 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
Created attachment 36996
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36996&action=edit
Patch to fix indention/trailing whitespace
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68857
Bug ID: 68857
Summary: [6 regression] FAIL:
gcc.target/i386/mpx/vararg-8-nov.c -O3 -g (internal
compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26427
Jan-Benedict Glaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de
--- Comment #23 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33120
--- Comment #26 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
Created attachment 36997
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36997&action=edit
Patch to fix indention/trailing whitespace
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26427
--- Comment #24 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
Created attachment 36998
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36998&action=edit
Patch to fix indention/trailing whitespace
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68858
Bug ID: 68858
Summary: Cannot use fold expression in requirements with two
parameters packs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68853
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
The while loop in:
421 void IncrementalMarking::ActivateIncrementalWriteBarrier() {
422 ActivateIncrementalWriteBarrier(heap_->old_space());
423 ActivateIncrementalWriteBarrier(heap_->map_space(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68775
--- Comment #10 from William Seurer ---
It fails with -fdbg-cnt=vect_slp:31 and succeeds with -fdbg-cnt=vect_slp:30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35710
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Created attachment 36996 [details]
> Patch to fix indention/trailing whitespace
Similar patch posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg01249.html
and approved at https://gcc.gnu.org/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66616
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor ---
After looking at all the wrong places I finally found the correct
one. I have proposed a fix on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg01271.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68810
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64818
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68833
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 37000
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37000&action=edit
gcc6-pr68833.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68841
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35710
--- Comment #15 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
Feel free to commit your patch, Dominique. You've been faster with providing a
fix. :) (But maybe incorporate the whitespace fixes as well.) Actually, there
are some more in the initial commit, but clean
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68859
Bug ID: 68859
Summary: Add a less strict/smarter version of -Wreorder
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68744
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-12-11 6:45 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> Is this PR fixed by revision r231485?
No. It just fixed the undefined __sync function warnings from HP ld.
The above
revision was appl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68859
--- Comment #1 from Ryan Johnson ---
(I would be happy to do some legwork on this if somebody is willing to send a
few pointers by PM. I know the code in gcc/cp/init.c, particularly functions
`perform_member_init` and `sort_mem_initializers` are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35710
--- Comment #16 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Fri Dec 11 16:39:49 2015
New Revision: 231571
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231571&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-11 Jan-Benedict Glaw
Dominique d'Hum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26427
--- Comment #25 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Fri Dec 11 16:39:49 2015
New Revision: 231571
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231571&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-11 Jan-Benedict Glaw
Dominique d'Hum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33120
--- Comment #27 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Fri Dec 11 16:39:49 2015
New Revision: 231571
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231571&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-11 Jan-Benedict Glaw
Dominique d'Hum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35710
--- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Feel free to commit your patch, Dominique. You've been faster with providing
> a fix. :) (But maybe incorporate the whitespace fixes as well.)
Done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66740
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68848
Daniel Kahn Gillmor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36989|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68841
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68854
--- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw ---
ANSI is a dialect of C. Why are you passing that flag to an assembler file?
=, arg4=, arg3=,
arg2=, arg1=)
at /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20151211/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-1.c:12
12char *x = __builtin_alloca (arg7);
$1 =
$2 = 1
!= 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-1.c -O3 -g line 16 arg1 == 1
15a1fce36358508909f2013fd6d07e0b9fcad97a is the first bad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
>
> --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
> So the mentioned revision is responsible for creation of a new consprop clone:
>
> IPA decision stage:
> ...
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 37002
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37002&action=edit
unreduced testcase
Reducing is very slow. Here is the unreduced testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #21 from The Written Word
---
I built gcc-4.7.4 with the change to gcc/config/ia64/hpux.h of "#undef
MAKE_DECL_ONE_ONLY" and just tried building gcc-4.8.5. Is anyone else seeing
this when trying to build libgomp:
/opt/build/gcc-4.8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #22 from Alexander ---
I tried using libgomp but is the same as your error has occurred.
After that , I only used libgmp, libmpc and libmpfr ( in the GCC source tree )
.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #23 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to Alexander from comment #22)
> I tried using libgomp but is the same as your error has occurred.
> After that , I only used libgmp, libmpc and libmpfr ( in the GCC source tree
> ) .
How do y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #24 from John Buddery ---
You can use --disable-libgomp in the configure command, I had to do this on my
HP builds.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #25 from Alexander ---
../gcc-4.8.5/configure \
--enable-languages=c,c++
--prefix=/import/home/nskdvlp/CC_Libs/CC/ia64-hp-hpux_11.31_-64 \
--with-local-prefix=/usr/CC/ia64-hp-hpux_11.31_-64 --with-gnu-as \
--with-as=/usr/local/bin/as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68854
--- Comment #2 from vasyl.vavrychuk at globallogic dot com ---
--ansi is passed by build system of a big 3rd party project that I compile. It
is possible to change it to remove --ansi but in my opinion there is gcc bug
too. Gcc should either:
* ig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68853
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68848
Daniel Kahn Gillmor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37001|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68848
Daniel Kahn Gillmor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37004|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68861
Bug ID: 68861
Summary: [6 regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla8.f90 -O3 -g
execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68848
Daniel Kahn Gillmor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37003|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473
--- Comment #9 from David Malcolm ---
Updated patch kit posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg01291.html
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
