https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68810
Bug ID: 68810
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-reinterpret1.C -- test
for errors -- -m32
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68810
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68810
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
In more detail, the c++11 failures look like this:
...
src/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-reinterpret1.C: In static member
function 'static constexpr B::Inner& B::getInner()':
src/gcc/testsuit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68810
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68785
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68785
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68583
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Dec 9 08:32:49 2015
New Revision: 231444
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231444&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-09 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/68583
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68674
--- Comment #3 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
ah yes, try without the "-mfpu=neon".
arm-none-eabi-gcc -mcpu=cortex-a9 -mfloat-abi=hard t.c -S -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68785
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5)
> Err, no - the only option would be to _not_ fold if elen < size. As
> said, SCCVN aggressively folds reads from initializers (even if
> in differing types).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68811
Bug ID: 68811
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: in get, at cgraph.h:1218
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68785
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 9 Dec 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68785
>
> --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68790
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Dec 9 09:34:59 2015
New Revision: 231446
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231446&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR ipa/68790
PR ipa/68790
* ipa-icf.c (sem_function::
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68674
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68785
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Reduced testcase:
int
foo (void)
{
return *(int *) "";
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68785
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 9 Dec 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68785
>
> --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Reduced testcase:
> int
> foo (void)
> {
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68806
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68302
--- Comment #14 from Aurelien Jarno ---
Created attachment 36970
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36970&action=edit
Output log 2
Unfortunately it still fails, though the output log is now slightly different.
Please find it at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68785
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 36971
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36971&action=edit
gcc6-pr68785.patch
Sure, it is undefined behavior, but I believe we should spend the minimum
amount of code on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68806
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r231015.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68785
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> Created attachment 36971 [details]
> gcc6-pr68785.patch
>
> Sure, it is undefined behavior, but I believe we should spend the minimum
> amount of code on it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68716
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from vrie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68716
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Wed Dec 9 10:13:35 2015
New Revision: 231449
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231449&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix GOMP/GOACC_parallel handling in find_func_clobbers
2015-12-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68417
--- Comment #4 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Older trunk showed (gcc version 6.0.0 20151202 (experimental) (GCC))
iftmp.1_19 = p1_36->y;
tree could trap...
Today's trunk (gcc version 6.0.0 20151209)
Applying if-conversion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68620
--- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon ---
Adding:
+(define_expand "movv4hf"
+ [(set (match_operand:V4HF 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "")
+ (match_operand:V4HF 1 "general_operand" ""))]
+ "TARGET_NEON"
+ "
+")
+
in neon.md makes this testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68812
Bug ID: 68812
Summary: [concepts] bogus mismatched argument pack lengths
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68793
Allan Jensen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68807
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68654
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68654
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> I think the difference is that the older flush_ssaname_freelist loop added
> the SSA_NAMEs from FREE_SSANAMES_QUEUE (cfun) in reverse order, i.e. it
> first push
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66526
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Dec 9 11:07:08 2015
New Revision: 231450
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231450&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/66526
* g-expect.adb (Set_Up_Child_Communicatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66526
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68811
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68809
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68806
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68803
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68417
--- Comment #5 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Richard,
STMT: m1 = p1->x - m;
While hashing p1->x being a component ref, we are hashing operand 0 part
ie TREE_OPERAND (ref, 0). This is unconditionally read and written.
STMT: p3->y = (m1 >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68797
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68795
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68797
--- Comment #2 from Steffen Hau ---
I have isl-0.15 installed on my system.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68716
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65948
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t at sharklasers dot com
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66027
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68790
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Dec 9 11:55:38 2015
New Revision: 231451
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231451&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR ipa/68790
PR ipa/68790
* ipa-icf.c (sem_function::
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68790
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68257
--- Comment #3 from Stephan Bergmann ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> So, if there is a bug, I'd say just that this is not well documented.
See the attached Fix-abi_tag-doc.patch.
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52770
--- Comment #2 from Stephan Bergmann ---
Created attachment 36972
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36972&action=edit
proposed documentation patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52770
Stephan Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36972|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68257
--- Comment #4 from Stephan Bergmann ---
Created attachment 36973
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36973&action=edit
proposed documentation patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66394
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68813
Bug ID: 68813
Summary: [openacc] lto1: internal compiler error: in
input_varpool_node, at lto-cgraph.c
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68417
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65534
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Bernhard Reutner-Fischer from comment #2)
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1)
> > > #ifndef OPTIMIZE_MANUALLY
> > > void setutent(void) {
> > > ((void)0);
> > > __setutent_unlocked
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68417
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Dec 9 12:29:19 2015
New Revision: 231452
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231452&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-09 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/68417
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68813
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Related discussion: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg02076.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68801
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68801
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68804
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68257
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #4)
> Created attachment 36973 [details]
> proposed documentation patch
is used as the ABI tag
?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68804
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Dup of PR 67317?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68806
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68583
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Dec 9 13:30:41 2015
New Revision: 231453
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231453&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-09 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/68583
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68786
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 9 13:42:06 2015
New Revision: 231454
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231454&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/68786
* tree-if-conv.c: Include built
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609
--- Comment #39 from James Greenhalgh ---
Author: jgreenhalgh
Date: Wed Dec 9 13:47:19 2015
New Revision: 231455
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231455&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Patch AArch64] Reinstate CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS to fix pr6760
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68257
--- Comment #6 from Stephan Bergmann ---
Created attachment 36974
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36974&action=edit
updated documentation patch
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> is used as the ABI tag
yeah, pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68257
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #3)
> Would that be considered something worthwhile to change, to only accept
>
> __attribute__((__abi_tag__))
>
> but reject
>
> __attribute__((__abi_tag__()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68257
--- Comment #8 from Stephan Bergmann ---
So if the documentation patch is acceptable and somebody with commit rights can
push it, we can close this issue as NOTABUG then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68583
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.0
Summary|[5/6 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68786
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68814
Bug ID: 68814
Summary: [6 regression] gcc.dg/pr63594-2.c fails since r226005
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68814
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68815
Bug ID: 68815
Summary: Error/warning diagnostic: '%s' should be converted to
%qs-like or %<%s%>-like string strings
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68816
Bug ID: 68816
Summary: gcc fails to detect pointer overflow leading to
undefined behaviour
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68815
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #0)
> In several cases - as in this one - the code enters as fmt string of a
> diagnostic function (visible as %%L is used). In those cases, '%s' can be
> replaced by %
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66949
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Dec 9 14:58:22 2015
New Revision: 231457
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231457&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/66949
* tree-ssa-phiopt.c (tree_ss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66949
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68816
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Since GCC isn't a static analyzer, and there is no overflow in your example to
detect, it's unsurprising (to me) that there's no diagnostic.
I assume you're asking for the anti-pattern to be recognized and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32643
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.0 |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68348
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
lds/trunk/64/20151209/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/f951':
double free or corruption (!prev): 0x02b23f30 ***
=== Backtrace: =
/lib64/libc.so.6[0x3c71a77d9e]
/lib64/libc.so.6(cfree+0x5b5)[0x3c71a839f5]
/gnumnt/msticlxl60_users/gnutester/stability/builds/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68817
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68818
Bug ID: 68818
Summary: Issue switching stacks on x86 with -fdefer-pop and
-fomit-frame-pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68816
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> there is no overflow in your example to detect,
AFAIK, the if statement can only be true if overflow occurs.
> I assume you're asking for the anti-pattern t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68819
Bug ID: 68819
Summary: Invalid "-Wmisleading-indentation" warning if code is
all in one line
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68348
--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #10)
> Indeed, seems to be fixed. I'll add the testcase.
Perhaps you can look at [1] ?
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg01001.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68348
--- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek ---
Sorry, I didn't notice that until I posted my version.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68348
--- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #12)
> Sorry, I didn't notice that until I posted my version.
Heh ;) No problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68730
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
And now I can only reproduce the ICE but not the hang. Eh.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68730
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Note that if you want to reproduce this by running cc1, add -march=x86-64:
$ ./cc1 -quiet v.c -O2 -fno-if-conversion -m32
$ ./cc1 -quiet v.c -O2 -fno-if-conversion -m32 -march=x86-64
v.c: In function ‘fn1’:
v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53223
benzejaa at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benzejaa at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66616
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32643
--- Comment #21 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Not to sound pedantic, but https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/management.html says:
The target milestone should be set to the next release of the newest active
release branch that needs fixing (the rationale is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68820
Bug ID: 68820
Summary: [6 regression] FAIL:
gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memops-asm.c execution,
-O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68819
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #0)
> I get the following bogus warning:
>
> Quadtree.h:210:0: warning: statement is indented as if it were guarded by...
> [-Wmisleading-indentation]
>unsigned in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53223
--- Comment #10 from benzejaa at gmail dot com ---
I wanted to add that it looks like decltype(auto) also has the same bug as
auto&& in this context.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60218
--- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Dec 9 16:59:26 2015
New Revision: 231460
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231460&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-12-09 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/60218
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68816
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60218
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Version|4.9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68730
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
The dominator ICE started with r228231.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68670
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68816
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #2)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> > there is no overflow in your example to detect,
>
> AFAIK, the if statement can only be true if overflow oc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68767
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
