https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68577
Bug ID: 68577
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: in expand_direct_optab_fn, at
internal-fn.c:2171
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
Zhendong Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
--- Comment #9 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
--- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
r230967 actually.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68553
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Nov 27 08:31:44 2015
New Revision: 230993
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230993&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-27 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/68553
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68578
Bug ID: 68578
Summary: [5 egression] ICE on invalid template declaration and
instantiation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68577
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68578
--- Comment #1 from Yury V. Zaytsev ---
Affected: GCC 5.2.1, unaffected: GCC 4.9.2 and reportedly trunk.
$ cat ice.i
template struct bar foo; template <> struct foo<>:
$ g++-5 -std=c++14 -w ice.i
ice.i:1:56: internal compiler error: Segmentati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68573
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68578
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68570
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68563
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 27 08:59:55 2015
New Revision: 230999
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230999&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/63326
* c-parser.c (c_parser_compound_statement_nost
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68552
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 27 09:01:20 2015
New Revision: 231000
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231000&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/68552
* optabs.c (expand_vec_perm_1):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68552
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68563
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> This was reported on the ML as a valid error. You should always use
> --disable-werror when building with LTO.
Ok, will do.
In the meantime, shoul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68498
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
See PR68549 and https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02633.html thread
for further information on loop flags. In particular PR68549 comment 6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68579
Bug ID: 68579
Summary: FAIL: libgomp.c/target-32.c execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68309
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67941
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68579
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68579
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Backtrace:
...
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x76f7a700 (LWP 6717)]
gomp_task_maybe_wait_for_dependencies (depend=depend@entry=0x76f79dd0)
at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68579
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 36853
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36853&action=edit
valgrind output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68470
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so the issue is the non-split part doesn't return but we keep and wire
the original return block (duplicated into the split part) into the
split-return
part of the main function. That leaves us with stm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68312
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Nov 27 09:36:20 2015
New Revision: 231001
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231001&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix memory leak in cilk
PR c++/68312
* c-array-notation.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68578
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68506
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Fri Nov 27 09:49:38 2015
New Revision: 231003
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231003&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ifcvt] PR rtl-optimization/68506: Fix emitting order
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68506
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67625
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68570
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68580
Bug ID: 68580
Summary: FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c -O0 execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68576
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68581
Bug ID: 68581
Summary: ICE in build_conditional_expr_1 upon instantiation of
a templated function with Cilk+ directives (valid
code)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68536
Yvan Roux changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yroux at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63693
Yury V. Zaytsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yury.zaytsev@traveltainment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68580
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #0)
> I can't yet reproduce this failure on the command line.
That includes 1 iterations of running the executable, for both -O2 and -O0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68579
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67702
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68536
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmm, I can definitely still reproduce based on today's trunk.
I'm using an arm-none-eabi compiler configured with
--without-isl --with-float=hard --with-cpu=cortex-a15 --with-fpu=neon-vfpv4
--wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68580
Dmitry Vyukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvyukov at google dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68582
Bug ID: 68582
Summary: -Wunused-function doesn't warn about unused static
__attribute__((noreturn)) functions
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68582
--- Comment #1 from Pedro Alves ---
Same thing with gcc version 4.8.3 20140911 (Red Hat 4.8.3-7) (GCC) [Fedora 20].
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68580
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dmitry Vyukov from comment #2)
> If you change types of:
>
> int v;
> int q;
> int o;
>
> to 'long long', does it fix the failure?
As long as I don't have a reliable way to reproduce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68564
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68553
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Nov 27 11:17:51 2015
New Revision: 231006
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231006&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-27 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/68553
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68553
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68540
--- Comment #1 from Martin Reinecke ---
I should probably add that building the trunk was possible without any problems
on Linux Mint until about two weeks ago. Unfortunately I do not know yet how to
isolate the problematic commit ... will look i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68578
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68536
--- Comment #6 from Yvan Roux ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #5)
> Hmm, I can definitely still reproduce based on today's trunk.
> I'm using an arm-none-eabi compiler configured with
> --without-isl --with-float=hard --with-cpu=cortex-a1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68343
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2015-11-13 00:00:00 |2015-11-27
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67477
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37150
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #15)
> Created attachment 29738 [details]
> maybe smaller testcase version ?
>
> Attached is what I think is roughly the smallest kernel of this type that we
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68250
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 27 12:12:35 2015
New Revision: 231009
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231009&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/68250
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68250.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68250
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 27 12:13:48 2015
New Revision: 231010
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231010&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/68250
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68250.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 68250 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68250
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68583
Bug ID: 68583
Summary: [5/6 Regression] Missed if-conversion
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68583
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68582
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68582
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Probably because noreturn uses the volatile bit, TREE_THIS_VOLATILE:
/* Warn about static fns or vars defined but not used. */
if (((warn_unused_function && TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL)
||
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64320
Georg Koppen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gk at torproject dot org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68563
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
LTO bootstrap on aarch64-linux with --disable-werror passes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68577
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
.ident "GCC: (unknown) 6.0.0 20151127 (experimental)"
.text
.code 16
.align 1
.L7:
bx r3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68214
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68540
--- Comment #2 from Martin Reinecke ---
OK, the problematic commit appears to be:
Revision 230759 - Directory Listing
Added Mon Nov 23 14:23:59 2015 UTC (3 days, 23 hours ago) by dje
Correct graphite*.c ISL header file inclusion order.
* system
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68564
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
Created attachment 36855
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36855&action=edit
patch
proposed patch; check for the multiarch string before checking for the
directory name.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68218
--- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Fri Nov 27 14:08:23 2015
New Revision: 231014
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231014&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2015-11-27 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68584
Bug ID: 68584
Summary: nested generic lambda with trailing return type cases
compiler crash
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 68559, which changed state.
Bug 68559 Summary: Excessive peeling for gaps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Nov 27 14:17:28 2015
New Revision: 231015
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231015&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-27 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/68559
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68584
--- Comment #1 from Gaetano.Checinski at gmail dot com ---
clang compiles this examples
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68585
Bug ID: 68585
Summary: [5/6 Regression] c++14 code accepted by 4.9 not
accepted by 5 and 6
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68218
--- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Fri Nov 27 14:35:46 2015
New Revision: 231017
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231017&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2015-11-27 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68570
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61233
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Fri Nov 27 14:48:21 2015
New Revision: 231020
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231020&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/61321 - demangler crash on casts in template parameters
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59195
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Fri Nov 27 14:48:21 2015
New Revision: 231020
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231020&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/61321 - demangler crash on casts in template parameters
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61321
--- Comment #16 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Fri Nov 27 14:48:21 2015
New Revision: 231020
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231020&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/61321 - demangler crash on casts in template parameters
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68312
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61233
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68586
Bug ID: 68586
Summary: [6 Regression] Enum template parameter wrongly
rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61321
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68427
--- Comment #6 from wam at hiwaay dot net ---
I see this is labelled as resolved. That is *NOT* true for me. All versions of
gcc on FreeBSD 9.3R that I have tried (4.8.5, 4.9.4, 5.2.0, 5.2.1) still
reproduce this bug as of today. I pkg-upgraded al
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68540
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68587
Bug ID: 68587
Summary: [6 Regression][UBSAN] ICE in expand_insn, at
optabs.c:6974
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68587
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Target Milestone|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68588
Bug ID: 68588
Summary: GCC requires constexpr for template non-type
parameter, even though constexpr conversion operator
exists
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68214
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68588
--- Comment #1 from pkalinin ---
[Attribution was incorrect, the last sentence is reworded from Columbo's
answer. Sorry.]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68587
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
The options can be reduced to:
g++ -O1 -ffast-math -fsanitize=null
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68587
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68432
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #33 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #32)
> reduced testcase:
..however this is not "our" bug, so there's no known reason to keep this PR
open, right?
.. if no-one objects by Monday 30th, then let's close i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #34 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So, for bugs that aren't fixed, sometimes we work around them. We can use this
bug to track things like the vendor bug status (fixed or not), and potential
workarounds. Plus, we can list this bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61039
Torsten Robitzki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Torsten at Robitzki dot de
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68432
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #10)
> Series finally posted here:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg03020.html
Part 05's gcc/genattrtab.c changes do not apply. (All other par
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68540
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68501
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
