https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68456
Yulia Koval changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 36818
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36818&action=edit
unreduced testcase
The reduced testcase doesn't reproduce the issue anymore.
I've attached a new unreduce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.0 |4.9.4
Summary|[6 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68502
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68509
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68506
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68221
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 24 09:17:40 2015
New Revision: 230793
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230793&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-24 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/68221
* tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513
Bug ID: 68513
Summary: ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:8832
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
--- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 09:31:57 2015
New Revision: 230795
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230795&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ree] PR rtl-optimization/68194: Restrict copy instru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] ICE in |[5/6 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68185
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 09:31:57 2015
New Revision: 230795
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230795&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ree] PR rtl-optimization/68194: Restrict copy instruc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68328
--- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 09:31:57 2015
New Revision: 230795
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230795&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ree] PR rtl-optimization/68194: Restrict copy instru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
--- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on trunk.
Will test the patch on 4.9 and GCC 5 and propose backports
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68337
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Tue Nov 24 09:45:20 2015
New Revision: 230796
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230796&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR c/68337
* gimple-fold.c: Include ipa-chkp.h.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68195
--- Comment #10 from Matthias Goldhoorn ---
Tested gcc6 (daily bump 20151124 (638a694865e4ad7d35397526251f1401e01afb54)
from git, branch master) same problem the binary for testcase1 segfaults, the
other ones running fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68403
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68506
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r218816:
commit 277f7164f168a399312b5871323c7de0990ef85b
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Dec 17 11:48:33 2014 +
PR middle-end/63568
* match.pd: Add (x & ~m) | (y & m) -> ((x ^
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68483
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 24 10:45:52 2015
New Revision: 230797
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230797&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/68483
* tree-vect-generic.c (lower_vec_perm): If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68514
Bug ID: 68514
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in tr1/5_numerical_facilities
libstdc++ test cases
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68508
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68509
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68506
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68510
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68375
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 11:03:51 2015
New Revision: 230798
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230798&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[cfgloop] PR middle-end/68375: Restructure get_loop_body_i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68375
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68357
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
This PR seems to have been fixed(?) between revisions r230734 (FAIL) and
r230777 (PASS). Without objection in the coming days I'll close it as FIXED.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68483
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 24 11:10:45 2015
New Revision: 230799
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230799&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/68483
* tree-vect-generic.c (lower_vec_perm): If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68454
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 68483, which changed state.
Bug 68483 Summary: [5/6 Regression] gcc 5.2: suboptimal code compared to 4.9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68483
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68483
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68329
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68515
Bug ID: 68515
Summary: std::result_of doesn't work when F is abstract
(with pure virtual functions)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54882
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67550
--- Comment #6 from Jason Wyatt ---
Adding a TREE_READONLY (to match TREE_READONLY being unset in
split_nonconstant_init) check seems to fix the generated gimple. This is total
guesswork though - I have no idea what side effects this change might
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473
Jay Foad changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jay.foad at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68516
Bug ID: 68516
Summary: ICE: OpenMP with simd collapse
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68517
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68517
Bug ID: 68517
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in tree-vect-data-refs.c:2751
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68497
--- Comment #2 from Mikhail Maltsev ---
Author: miyuki
Date: Tue Nov 24 12:18:21 2015
New Revision: 230803
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230803&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR68497 (ICE with -fno-checking)
gcc/
PR target/68497
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68497
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68506
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm testing a fix, but there's a slight issue with the testcase.
__assert_fail () doesn't exist for non-glibc libraries i.e. newlib so the
testcase fails to link there.
I tried replacing the __as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #25 from Janne Blomqvist ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #24)
> (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #16)
> > For what its worth:
> >
> > $ gfc pr51119.f90 -lblas -fno-external-blas -Ofast -march=native
> > $ ./a.out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68506
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Replacing __assert_fail () with abort () and compiling with -fno-builtin-abort
works, so I'll do that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #26 from Janne Blomqvist ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #15)
> Another issue: What should we do if the user supplies an external
> subroutine DGEMM which does something unrelated?
>
> I suppose we should then make DGEMM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68502
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0804a482 in train_match (spot=0) at scanner.c:407
407 f1_layer[ti].W = f1_layer[ti].I[cp] + a*(f1_layer[ti].U);
(gdb) l
402
403
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68512
Thomas Wood changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68518
Bug ID: 68518
Summary: ICE on invalid code using lambda in variadic template
in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12997
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68221
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 24 13:14:58 2015
New Revision: 230806
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230806&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-24 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/68221
* tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68508
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 36821
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36821&action=edit
gcc5-pr68508.patch
Untested GCC 5 fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
--- Comment #6 from ktka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68508
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 36822
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36822&action=edit
gcc6-pr68508.patch
Untested GCC 6 fix.
So, my first patch for this was the gcc5-* one, just let the code ignor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68381
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 13:35:56 2015
New Revision: 230809
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230809&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Testcase for PR rtl-optimization/68381
PR rtl-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68381
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The correctness issue has been fixed.
I'll keep this open for now to investigate the missed optimisation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68519
Bug ID: 68519
Summary: condition_variable::wait_for does not work properly
with float duration
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68519
Jorge Bellon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbellon at bsc dot es
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Is this still a problem?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68492
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Confirmed btw. have yet to reduce to sth meaningful (read: hopefully w/o LTO).
#0 internal_error (gmsgid=gmsgid@entry=0x183b3b7 "in %s, at %s:%d")
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/diagnostic.c:125
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68517
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The x86_64 compiler was configured simply with --disable-multilib
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
arm cross compiler configured with:
--without-isl --with-cpu=cortex-a15 --with-fpu=neon-vfpv4 -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #20)
> Is this still a problem?
I don't believe so - I've bootstrapped 5.2.1(r230380) all langs incl. Ada and
Java.
Likewise 4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #22 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Is this still a problem?
I'm bootstrapping gcc mainline on Mac OS X 10.11.2 Beta just fine. The
only problem I'm seeing for quite a w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67677
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:04:11 2015
New Revision: 230811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix for and_operand oversight (PR68332, PR67677)
Calling rs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68332
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:04:11 2015
New Revision: 230811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix for and_operand oversight (PR68332, PR67677)
Calling rs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:04:11 2015
New Revision: 230811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix for and_operand oversight (PR68332, PR67677)
Calling rs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #22)
> > --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > Is this still a problem?
>
> I'm bootstrapping gcc mainline on Mac OS X 10.11.2 Beta just fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68498
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 36825
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36825&action=edit
Tentative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #24 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #22)
>> > --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
>> > Is this still a problem?
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68332
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
--- Comment #3 from Tom Tromey ---
(In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #2)
> > The attribute syntax in the test case doesn't work with gcc. The attributes
> > on the function definitions can't appear at the end.
>
> Placing attributes at t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68520
Bug ID: 68520
Summary: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in
quick_push, at vec.h:845
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68520
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67954
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68520
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63997
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Any objection to apply the following patch
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr61526_0.c 2014-08-21
21:02:16.0 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr61526_0.c2015-01-15 12:35:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68328
--- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:24:24 2015
New Revision: 230812
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230812&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ree] PR rtl-optimization/68194: Restrict copy instru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
--- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:24:24 2015
New Revision: 230812
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230812&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ree] PR rtl-optimization/68194: Restrict copy instru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68185
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:24:24 2015
New Revision: 230812
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230812&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ree] PR rtl-optimization/68194: Restrict copy instruc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
--- Comment #13 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:27:51 2015
New Revision: 230813
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230813&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ree] PR rtl-optimization/68194: Restrict copy instru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68328
--- Comment #13 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:27:51 2015
New Revision: 230813
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230813&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ree] PR rtl-optimization/68194: Restrict copy instru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68185
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:27:51 2015
New Revision: 230813
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230813&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ree] PR rtl-optimization/68194: Restrict copy instruc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68321
Bug 68321 depends on bug 68194, which changed state.
Bug 68194 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on
x86_64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67702
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:03:16PM +, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
> 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 still fails:
>
Need an example the code causing the problem. I do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63997
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
> Any objection to apply the following patch
>
> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr61526_0.c2014-08-21
> 21:02:16.0 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68519
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #27 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #22)
> I agree that inline should be faster, if the compiler is reasonably smart,
> if the matrix dimensions are known at compile time (i.e. should be able to
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68520
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68519
Jorge Bellon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36824|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68492
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: Final SLP tree for instance:
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: node
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: stmt 0 REALPART_EXPR = _834;
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: stmt 1 IMAGPART_EXP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68221
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68514
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68517
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68519
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug 65530 depends on bug 68337, which changed state.
Bug 68337 Summary: [MPX] memcpy() for arrays with function pointers results in
huge resource usage and binaries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68337
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68337
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
