https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68396
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Nov 19 18:25:38 2015
New Revision: 230620
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230620&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68396
2015-11-19 Ryan Burn
* pt.c (find_parame
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67868
--- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt ---
However, I should note that although libvtv builds and installs for Power, it
fails the testsuite completely, so we are going to leave this disabled for now.
I'll open a bug report on the test failures.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68443
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68444
Bug ID: 68444
Summary: [libvtv] All libvtv tests fail for powerpc*-*-linux*
(undefined references)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68445
Bug ID: 68445
Summary: ICE: internal compiler error: in operator[], at vec.h
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66762
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> The attached patch fixes the problem but is, as yet, not regtested.
Confirmed and regtested without regression. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502
--- Comment #18 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
A bit simplified variant:
#include
int main()
{
int x, y = 1;
int *volatile v;
int *p;
v = &y;
p = v;
if (p == &x + 1) {
*p = 2;
printf("y = %d\n", y);
}
}
077t.ali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68446
Bug ID: 68446
Summary: jit testsuite failures seen inside
dwarf2out.c:gen_producer_string
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68446
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #0)
[...]
> I ran a git bisect, it indicated that the failure of test-volatile.c was
> introduced by:
>
> commit 25faed340686df8d7bb2242dc8d04285976922b6
> Author: mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68443
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
{ typedef M I; };
enum Type { };
typedef Dl L;
Type t;
struct R { X1 f; };
};
With: gcc version 6.0.0 20151119 (experimental) (GCC)
t.i: In instantiation of ‘class Dl’:
t.i:8:47: required from ‘class X1’
t.i:16:20: required from here
t.i:1:30: error: TYPE_CANONICAL is not compatibl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68447
Bug ID: 68447
Summary: ICE with -Wall on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in
fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:9085
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61534
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
The last patch did not fix the original testcase nor
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr40172-3.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61534
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
So that's why this PR is still open.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61534
--- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #9)
> So that's why this PR is still open.
Sure, sorry, I should have been clearer. It was mostly a note to myself so I do
not need to re-check next time I look
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61534
--- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek ---
Np. It's certainly something I'd love to see fixed :/. Hopefully the next
stage1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68447
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68412
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68448
Bug ID: 68448
Summary: Python Pretty Printers get disabled on libstdc++
reload by GDB
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68448
--- Comment #1 from Jan Kratochvil ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279406
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68448
--- Comment #2 from Jan Kratochvil ---
[patch] Python Pretty Printers get disabled on libstdc++ reload by GDB (PR
libstdc++/68448)
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02418.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68449
Bug ID: 68449
Summary: ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression on atomic_load in
C++
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68348
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68427
--- Comment #5 from wam at hiwaay dot net ---
Created attachment 36776
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36776&action=edit
response to comment 4
Here is the stuff in reply to comment 4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68412
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Nov 19 22:04:00 2015
New Revision: 230627
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230627&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/68412
* c-typeck.c (parser_build_binary_op): Prope
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68412
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68422
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Nov 19 22:29:08 2015
New Revision: 230629
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230629&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68422
* cp-tree.h (PACK_EXPANSION_SIZEOF_P): New.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68442
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68335
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68441
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68440
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68341
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68439
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68335
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop ---
testcase added in r230630
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68065
--- Comment #32 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
Sorry for the late reply. Decided to read DR 260 and got distracted. It
so fundamentally undermines the base of classical C that it took me some
time to grasp the scale:-)
On 2015-11-12 01:51, jose
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68428
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68065
--- Comment #33 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
On 2015-11-12 06:25, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68065
>
> --- Comment #31 from Martin Sebor ---
> (In reply to Alexander Cherepanov from comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68065
--- Comment #34 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, ch3root at openwall dot com wrote:
> What does the following mean then?
>
> C11, 4p5:
> "A strictly conforming program[...] It [...] shall not exceed any
> minimum im
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68450
Bug ID: 68450
Summary: regex matching different from ECMAScript?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68448
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66573
jvg1981 at aim dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvg1981 at aim dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68451
Bug ID: 68451
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when using
decltype with friend inside a class template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68452
Bug ID: 68452
Summary: C front end doesn't call PLUGIN_FINISH_DECL on
CONST_DECLs
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68279
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2015-11-20
--- Comment #4 from Joos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68453
Bug ID: 68453
Summary: graphite ICE: segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68453
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68454
Bug ID: 68454
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68454
--- Comment #1 from M Joshua Ryan ---
This is on a fresh install of cygwin64 on a new Windows 10 laptop.
101 - 148 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
