[Bug c++/68394] New: [concepts] segfault in valid code

2015-11-17 Thread ryan.burn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68394 Bug ID: 68394 Summary: [concepts] segfault in valid code Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Ass

[Bug c++/68395] New: [concepts] segfault in valid code

2015-11-17 Thread ryan.burn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68395 Bug ID: 68395 Summary: [concepts] segfault in valid code Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Ass

[Bug c++/68395] [concepts] segfault in valid code

2015-11-17 Thread ryan.burn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68395 --- Comment #1 from ryan.burn at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 36745 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36745&action=edit preprocessed code

[Bug bootstrap/68346] [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux

2015-11-17 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68346 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Nov 17 21:49:23 2015 New Revision: 230508 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230508&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR bootstrap/68346 * typeck.c (build_static_cast_1): Forc

[Bug c++/68396] New: bug with parameter pack expansion

2015-11-17 Thread ryan.burn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68396 Bug ID: 68396 Summary: bug with parameter pack expansion Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Ass

[Bug libstdc++/68397] New: std::tr1::expint fails in __expint_En_cont_frac for some long double arguments due to low __max_iter value

2015-11-17 Thread uquendo at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68397 Bug ID: 68397 Summary: std::tr1::expint fails in __expint_En_cont_frac for some long double arguments due to low __max_iter value Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UN

[Bug tree-optimization/68398] New: coremark regression due to r229685

2015-11-17 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68398 Bug ID: 68398 Summary: coremark regression due to r229685 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimiz

[Bug tree-optimization/68373] autopar fails on loop exit phi with argument defined outside loop

2015-11-17 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68373 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|UNCON

[Bug middle-end/68392] ICE: SIGSEGV in update_uses (fwprop.c:896) with -fno-checking

2015-11-17 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68392 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libgcc/59412] __fixunsdfDI triggers wrong inexact exceptions

2015-11-17 Thread pangbw at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59412 --- Comment #2 from baoshan --- Why this has been unconfirmed for so long time? Can someone tell us if this is a bug in libgcc2.c or not? Thanks.

[Bug libgcc/59412] __fixunsdfDI triggers wrong inexact exceptions

2015-11-17 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59412 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- It's a bug in libgcc2.c for the subset of targets for which this code gets used (note 64-bit targets will generally be using it for TImode not DImode) *and* which have hardware exceptions.

[Bug tree-optimization/66949] [6 Regression] ICE at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree_ssa_phiopt_worker, at tree-ssa-phiopt.c:335

2015-11-17 Thread anton at samba dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66949 Anton Blanchard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anton at samba dot org --- Comment #3

[Bug libgcc/59412] __fixunsdfDI triggers wrong inexact exceptions

2015-11-17 Thread pangbw at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59412 --- Comment #4 from baoshan --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #3) > It's a bug in libgcc2.c for the subset of targets for which this code gets > used (note 64-bit targets will generally be using it for TImode not > DImode) *

[Bug middle-end/68393] internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:286

2015-11-17 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68393 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirme

[Bug other/46218] TARGET_PREFERRED_OUTPUT_RELOAD_CLASS is not documented

2015-11-17 Thread sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46218 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/68393] internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:286

2015-11-17 Thread anton at samba dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68393 --- Comment #3 from Anton Blanchard --- No problems Richard! Thanks for the quick fix, it works for me.

[Bug other/42270] manual's sections are ordered counter intuitively

2015-11-17 Thread sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42270 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/68399] New: c++11 default initialization of a large array: slow compile

2015-11-17 Thread kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68399 Bug ID: 68399 Summary: c++11 default initialization of a large array: slow compile Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/68400] New: ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2125

2015-11-17 Thread nbd at nbd dot name
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68400 Bug ID: 68400 Summary: ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2125 Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: targe

[Bug middle-end/68117] [6 Regression] error: invalid PHI argument <<< Unknown tree: >>>

2015-11-17 Thread gary at intrepid dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68117 --- Comment #36 from Gary Funck --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #35) > Yes, I thought the cfgexpand.c place is a better one and the only one > that would be related to the place where I removed the old > redirect_edge_var_map_dest

[Bug libgcc/59412] __fixunsdfDI triggers wrong inexact exceptions

2015-11-17 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59412 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I'm not aware of anyone working on these exceptions / rounding modes issues.

[Bug c++/68396] bug with parameter pack expansion

2015-11-17 Thread ryan.burn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68396 --- Comment #1 from ryan.burn at gmail dot com --- It looks like this was caused with the commit "Handle auto parameter packs." (https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/018c146eec4143116f7f422239d56eb4047be3a4#diff-8570312acacadf34317aa24621800c0

[Bug fortran/68401] New: improve 'Allocation would exceed memory limit'

2015-11-17 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401 Bug ID: 68401 Summary: improve 'Allocation would exceed memory limit' Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fort

[Bug c++/68158] Function attributes parsed incorrectly in C++ (while -fcilkplus)

2015-11-17 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68158 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/68383] Demangler stack overflow

2015-11-17 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68383 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Created attachment 36749 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36749&action=edit Somewhat reduced testcase markus@x4 tmp % g++ -w -c -std=c++14 write.ii markus@x4 tmp % nm write.o | grep

[Bug tree-optimization/68402] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/split-path-1.c execution test

2015-11-17 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68402 Bug ID: 68402 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/split-path-1.c execution test Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/68402] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/split-path-1.c execution test

2015-11-17 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68402 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgomp/68403] New: FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/loop-auto-1.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 (internal compiler error)

2015-11-17 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68403 Bug ID: 68403 Summary: FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/loop-aut o-1.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 (internal compiler error)

[Bug libgomp/68403] FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/loop-auto-1.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 (internal compiler error)

2015-11-17 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68403 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgomp/68403] FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/loop-auto-1.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 (internal compiler error)

2015-11-17 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68403 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- src/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/loop-auto-1.c:119:9: internal compiler error: in gimplify_omp_for, at gimplify.c:8605 0xd6ff23 gimplify_omp_for src/gcc/gi

[Bug libgomp/68403] FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/loop-auto-1.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 (internal compiler error)

2015-11-17 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68403 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fails with r230508 for me.

<    1   2