[Bug target/68124] [6 Regression] Many i386 test failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68124 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68139 Bug ID: 68139 Summary: rethrow_if_nested should tolerate overloaded unary operator& Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug target/62018] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ftrapv-(1|2).c * execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin1[34]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|FAIL: |FAIL: |gcc.dg/t

[Bug fortran/68040] [5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68040 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/68065] Size calculations for VLAs can overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68065 --- Comment #13 from Alexander Cherepanov --- On 2015-10-27 20:09, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote: > I think it's undefined at the point where a type exceeds the limit on the > size of an object (half the address space minus one byte) Wait

[Bug c/68065] Size calculations for VLAs can overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68065 --- Comment #14 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, ch3root at openwall dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68065 > > --- Comment #13 from Alexander Cherepanov --- > On 2015-10-27 20:09, josep

[Bug c/68065] Size calculations for VLAs can overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68065 --- Comment #15 from Alexander Cherepanov --- On 2015-10-29 02:38, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote: >>> I think it's undefined at the point where a type exceeds the limit on the >>> size of an object (half the address space minus one byte) >

[Bug tree-optimization/68140] New: ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1413

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68140 Bug ID: 68140 Summary: ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1413 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug fortran/68040] [5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68040 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c/68119] GCC diagnostic push/pop interfere with control flow statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68119 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org Re

[Bug c/41517] Unexpected behaviour of #pragma in statement context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41517 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbrandmeyer at google dot com ---

[Bug c/41517] Unexpected behaviour of #pragma in statement context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41517 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i686-pc-linux-gnu | CC|

[Bug c/63326] whether a #pragma is a statement depends on the type of pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326 --- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Related bug: PR42979

[Bug c/59367] Syntax error with #pragma message before "else"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59367 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/42979] OpenMP #pragma omp taskwait after a label is not permitted - should fail at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42979 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||felix.abecassis at gmail dot com

[Bug fortran/51993] Erroneous type component initialization leads to internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51993 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/68040] [5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68040 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Is this configured with --enable-checking=release ? This is probably an ICE > that occurs earlier than reported with --enabled-checking=release. > Configure with --enable-checking=yes. I get the sam

[Bug libstdc++/68133] constexpr basic_string_view(const _CharT* __str)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68133 --- Comment #2 from __vic --- Too much black magic in the library already... I think this is defect in specification/design of the class. But it's easier for you guys to reach the committee than for me

<    1   2