https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68073
--- Comment #2 from nikola.kovacs at gmail dot com ---
It's not my code, I'm just trying to make it work.
The problem is it creates a new string into data, which is
std::aligned_storage:
new (&data) target_type(std::forward(val));
If the string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68073
--- Comment #3 from nikola.kovacs at gmail dot com ---
Never mind, I misread the documentation.
It looks like something else is causing the problem, since this works fine, and
it calls the destructor directly: (modified example from
http://en.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66681
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
A patch has been submitted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-09/msg00024.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68076
Bug ID: 68076
Summary: f95i reports "out of memory" on simple testcase
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68076
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68076
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Up to revision r228467 (2015-10-05) I get the ICE
f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11
At r228566 (2015-10-07) the test compiles without any problem, likely r228551
(pr65766).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68073
--- Comment #4 from nikola.kovacs at gmail dot com ---
(sorry for the triple post) I figured it out, it was caused by swap operating
on std::aligned_storage, so it didn't properly swap the string.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66681
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6)
> A patch has been submitted at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-09/msg00024.html.
Hi Dominique,
If you follow the correspondence, it ended with questio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68057
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
BTW there is a big binary size increase for SPEC2000/2006 apps using flto,
see https://vmakarov.fedorapeople.org/spec/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52622
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Does the problem still exist?
The change occurred between revisions r217100 (2014-11-04) and r217500
(2014-11-13), likely r217383 for pr44054.
Note that there is probably still a latent bug, an lea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68053
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66681
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Hi Dominique,
>
> If you follow the correspondence, it ended with questions from me that
> were never answered.
>
> Paul
Indeed I have read https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-09/msg00071.html! I ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68077
Bug ID: 68077
Summary: Namespace having the same name as contained class
should not compile
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56471
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-06-29 00:00:00 |2015-10-24
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68078
Bug ID: 68078
Summary: segfault with allocate and stat for derived types with
default initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67805
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Oct 24 16:20:26 2015
New Revision: 229287
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229287&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-24 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/67805
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63510
--- Comment #13 from Chen Gang ---
gcc version 6.0.0 20151023 (experimental) (GCC) has no this issue (I guess, the
reason is that it calls gimple_simplify instead of fold_binary).
For me, this issue can be closed.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67600
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68055
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Oct 24 17:09:35 2015
New Revision: 229288
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229288&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-24 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/68055
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67600
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68079
Bug ID: 68079
Summary: hppa: pointers to method types need canonicalization
before comparison
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68079
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 36575
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36575&action=edit
Patch for gcc-5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68079
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 36574
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36574&action=edit
Patch for trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32151
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68079
--- Comment #3 from deller at gmx dot de ---
Hi Dave,
Thanks for creating this bug report.
On 24.10.2015 19:48, danglin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68079
> A number of kde packages (e.g., kitemmodels)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68080
Bug ID: 68080
Summary: gcov returns negative counts
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68080
--- Comment #1 from Joshua Cranmer ---
For what it's worth:
jcranmer@huitzilopochtli /tmp/gcov-dir $ c++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=c++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63827
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68067
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68081
Bug ID: 68081
Summary: Cygwin GCC cannot compile program that uses
__builtin_ia32_rdseed64_step
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68081
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68081
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Why are you using the builtin directly? You should be using the intrinsics
> form instead.
Its a cross product of (1) that's what the docs tell me to use for R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68081
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > Why are you using the builtin directly? You should be using the intrinsics
> > form instead.
>
> Its a cross p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65947
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr65947-1.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr65947-1.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/opt/gcc/gcc-20151024/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65947-1.c:10:1: error: bogus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68082
Bug ID: 68082
Summary: issue on 64 bit shift
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcc
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68082
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68083
Bug ID: 68083
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimiza
mic_sub_fetch(p, 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE) == 0;
return 1;
}
GCC (6.0.0 20151024) generates the following assembler code:
dec_ref:
cmp $2, (%rdi)
movl$1, %eax
jc .L7
rep ret
.p2align 4,,10
.p2align 3
.L7:
lock subl $1, (%rdi)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68085
Bug ID: 68085
Summary: bug when using anonymous structs in function
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68085
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62109
David changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33302|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68070
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68056
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |c
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976
--- Comment #30 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Giuseppe Ottaviano from comment #19)
> At Facebook we experienced a similar regression, compilation times more than
> doubled for several large C++ files.
> We found that the regression was mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68086
Bug ID: 68086
Summary: Expression explicitly defined outside the loop is
moved inside the loop by the optimizer
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68086
--- Comment #1 from Igor A. Goussarov ---
Created attachment 36579
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36579&action=edit
Performance test for the problem
46 matches
Mail list logo
