https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68023
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68027
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68026
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68025
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid, diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68021
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68018
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68018
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #2)
> I am also seeing this (or another in ix86_compute_frame_layout) ICE when
> running the gfortran testsuite. Again with -mstackrealing. I will post the
> testcase when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68017
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68017
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Summary|[5 Regression] I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68027
--- Comment #3 from SztfG at yandex dot ru ---
btw why nobody confirm my old reported bug about stack-allocated array missed
optimization https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66152 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66152
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think there might be already another bug about this same exact thing but I
can't seem to find it right now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68025
--- Comment #2 from Yuan Pengfei ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Confirmed. profile-arcs is not supposed to be used in optimize pragmas or
> attributes and GCC should emit an error here but somehow it does not.
If so, how can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68024
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68016
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yeah, this is intentional design decision, trying to register something for an
object that might be living in completely different library and where the gap
might not be supplied is just wrong.
As the copy re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67854
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67907
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68026
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68021
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67443
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
I see multiple issues with ao_ref_from_mem connected with MEM_OFFSET/MEM_SIZE.
I don't remember exactly what was the issue with the promoted parameters
but it may have been with ranges_overlap_p not dealing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68017
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67947
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50599
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61938
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61931
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61906
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66625
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51794
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54417
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66912
--- Comment #3 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nsz
Date: Tue Oct 20 09:37:27 2015
New Revision: 229024
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229024&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix default_binds_local_p_2 for extern protected data
gcc:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66912
--- Comment #4 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nsz
Date: Tue Oct 20 09:50:58 2015
New Revision: 229030
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229030&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix default_binds_local_p_2 for extern protected data
Backp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67904
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67823
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66912
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67685
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67654
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67581
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68026
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68028
Bug ID: 68028
Summary: Compilation error "lto1: error: target attribute or
pragma changes single precision floating point", with
"-flto" on different variant of powerpc like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67868
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue Oct 20 10:36:33 2015
New Revision: 229043
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229043&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix VTV for targets with section anchors.
2015-10-20 Ramana Rad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67868
--- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue Oct 20 10:36:54 2015
New Revision: 229044
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229044&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix VTV for targets with section anchors.
2015-10-20 Ramana Rad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67868
--- Comment #8 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue Oct 20 10:39:30 2015
New Revision: 229045
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229045&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Enable VTV for aarch64 and arm
Requires fix for section anchors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68015
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67966
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Revision r228586 also caused
FAIL: g++.dg/opt/flifetime-dse2.C -std=gnu* execution test
on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with both -m32 and -m64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68020
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66755
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53440
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67460
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67064
--- Comment #30 from Daniel Gutson ---
May I ask what's wrong with Andres Tiraboschi's solution approach?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68028
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67907
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67460
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #7)
> Are you going to fix 5 branch as well? If not, would you like me to do the
> honours for you?
Please do it. I have no free time to spend on GCC these days. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68017
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Oct 20 12:34:19 2015
New Revision: 229073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-20 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/68017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68017
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.0
Target Milestone|6.0
: No such file or directory
gcc.exe a.c -fdiagnostics-color=never
will output not colored error: a.c: No such file or directory
gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 6.0.0 20151020 (experimental)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67435
--- Comment #10 from Yann Collet ---
> there already is an aligned attribute for functions, variables and fields,
Sure, but none of them is related to aligning the start of an hot instruction
loop. Aligning the function instead looks like a poor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67443
--- Comment #17 from Dominik Vogt ---
> So does [patch] fix the issue?
Yes. The testsuite on 64-bit and 31-bit systems has no regressions with the
patch either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67964
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67443
--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67443
>
> --- Comment #17 from Dominik Vogt ---
> > So does [patch] fix the issue?
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68030
Bug ID: 68030
Summary: Redundant address calculations in vectorized loop
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68015
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Created attachment 36549
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36549&action=edit
Experimental fix
I'm regression testing the attached patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68030
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68031
Bug ID: 68031
Summary: cc1 crashes when compiling newlib / mktm_r.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68031
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54389
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171
--- Comment #4 from Andre Vehreschild ---
Hi Paul,
please compare:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-10/msg00033.html
to your fix. Sounds like we are doing the same.
- Andre
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:13:55 +
"pault at gcc dot gnu.org" wr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68031
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The usual name_registered_for_update_p trick helps.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68031
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Yeah, it hits fold_stmt and follows SSA edges via nonnegative but it is not
supposed to (follow SSA edges). Reduced testcase:
void _mktm_r (long lcltime, int *res)
{
long rem = lcltime % ((60L * 60L) *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51591
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67933
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #3)
> (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #2)
> > The generated finalization wrapper has code doing
> > deallocate(ptr2%classes(:)%class_var)
> > where ptr2 is a poin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59796
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21855
Andrew Haley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68032
Bug ID: 68032
Summary: std-c++-14: Regex fails to match
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15525
Andrew Haley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67963
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67963
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 20 15:12:37 2015
New Revision: 229082
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229082&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Properly handle -miamcu and -march=lakemont
-miamcu specifies how
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67985
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 20 15:12:37 2015
New Revision: 229082
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229082&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Properly handle -miamcu and -march=lakemont
-miamcu specifies how
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67985
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66810
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 20 15:20:29 2015
New Revision: 229083
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229083&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Skip local error_mark_node decls
There is no need to finalize loca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66810
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67989
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68023
David Barto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68023
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #13 from Joseph John ---
Yes. i also tried without the mlp64 option both for building the 4.7.4 and also
for building the 4.9.2 using the 4.7.4 but again I have the same issue. Means.
* 4.7.4 build is successful.
* 4.9.2 build fails a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #14 from John Buddery ---
I did get a working 4.9.2 build, with the workaround from my earlier comment.
It's a 32 bit build, bootstrapped with the hp 4.6.2 gcc distribution, my config
line was:
$ ../gcc-4.9.2/configure --disable-l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67980
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52970
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68021
--- Comment #3 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
It looks like unswitching of outer loops pass simply triggers the issue and
this tree-ssa-loop-ivopts issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51947
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67948
Andre Vieira changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52052
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52403
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51815
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609
--- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Oct 20 16:26:05 2015
New Revision: 229087
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229087&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-20 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/67609
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19109
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 20 16:29:28 2015
New Revision: 229088
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229088&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add --enable-compressed-debug-sections={all,gas,gold,ld}
This patc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51632
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609
--- Comment #11 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I've committed the patch into the trunk. As the patch is not trivial, I'd wait
for a week before committing it into gcc-5-branch to see how it is doing on the
trunk first.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45859
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67964
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Oct 20 16:53:45 2015
New Revision: 229091
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229091&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/67964
* c-parser.c (c_parser_attributes): Break ou
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
