https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67844
--- Comment #3 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Patch available https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg00358.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697
mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.9.4
--- Comment #74 from mw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67816
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Reduction result looks the same. Maybe critical is that the compiler is built
with release checking (though that would be pretty serious - code gen depending
on CHECKING)
> /gcc/spec/sb-czerny-head-64/x86_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67816
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Yeah, trunk configured with --enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c
--disable-bootstrap reproduces the issue for me. Scary.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67816
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
#1 0x00ae7683 in duplicate_thread_path (
entry= 23)>,
exit= 59)>, region=0x1b68550, n_region=10,
region_copy=0x1b6abf0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67830
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67816
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67844
--- Comment #4 from Roland B ---
(In reply to Ville Voutilainen from comment #3)
> Patch available https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg00358.html
Works for me (sqlpp11, develop branch).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67830
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67828
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54430
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67816
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Started with r228306.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67819
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Yeah, exactly; this problem will require some significant effort, I'm afraid
>:(.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67839
--- Comment #1 from Senthil Kumar Selvaraj ---
Created attachment 36444
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36444&action=edit
Test case
Compile with avr-gcc test.c -Os
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67847
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Justas L from comment #4)
> I haven't tested this yet, but I understand this global solution would
> affect the performance of ALL functions, not only those that interface with
> outside code, corr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 36445
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36445&action=edit
Patch that enables force_align_arg_pointer attribute for x86_64 targets
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67841
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> ix86_expand_prologue in i386.c has
>
> /* The computation of the size of the re-aligned stack frame means
> that we must allocate the size of the register
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67848
Bug ID: 67848
Summary: ICE on gcc.dg/atomic/pr65345-4.c and
gcc.dg/pr65345-3.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67821
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67844
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67844
--- Comment #5 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ville
Date: Mon Oct 5 09:57:20 2015
New Revision: 228468
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228468&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-05 Ville Voutilainen
PR 67844.
* inc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67828
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67830
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67846
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67843
--- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon ---
I can attach a statically linked binary, if that helps.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42734
--- Comment #49 from Jonathan Wakely ---
std::thread no longer uses shared_ptr on trunk, so no longer depends on atomics
and doesn't break if you mix objects compiled with and without native atomics,
e.g. mixing objects built for i386 with object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67849
Bug ID: 67849
Summary: AVX512 Hitting upper-bank register on extract insn
split
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: assemble-failure, wrong-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67783
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 5 11:15:10 2015
New Revision: 228472
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228472&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-05 Richard Biener
PR ipa/67783
* ipa-inline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67783
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.5, 6.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67821
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
I think this should be just
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssanames.c b/gcc/tree-ssanames.c
index 64e2379..c3484fe 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssanames.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssanames.c
@@ -561,7 +561,10 @@ reset_flow_sensitive_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67730
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Oct 5 12:35:20 2015
New Revision: 228480
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228480&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/67730
* c-typeck.c (convert_for_assignment): Use t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67730
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67850
Bug ID: 67850
Summary: Wrong call_used_regs used in aggregate_value_p
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: midd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67851
Bug ID: 67851
Summary: improve "no unique final overrider" error
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67852
Bug ID: 67852
Summary: false warning: trigraph reported
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67783
--- Comment #6 from Ulya ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> Fixed on trunk sofar.
Thank you! Compiles much faster now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67853
Bug ID: 67853
Summary: decltype of parenthesized xvalue does not correctly
yield rvalue-reference
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67840
--- Comment #2 from BENAÏSSA ---
THank you for your reply. A.BENAÏSSA
Le Dimanche 4 octobre 2015 16h26, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
a écrit :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67840
Andrew Pinski changed:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67816
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Thanks. I've got it to fault here. It'll be first on the list of things to do
today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67850
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at ucw dot cz
--- Comment #1 from H.J.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67852
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Why do you think it's a false warning?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65021
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Mon Oct 5 14:07:50 2015
New Revision: 228488
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228488&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR other/65021] mkoffloads -save-temps handling, and cleanup cleanu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67852
--- Comment #2 from julien.boucaron at gmail dot com ---
It does not seem to be a correctly defined trigraph sequences.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67758
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|kargl at gcc dot gnu.org |mikael at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67816
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
As I suspected, what's happening is we've got an FSM jump thread path. After
we register the FSM path DOM discovers that a block embedded in the path has a
control statement with a staticly computable des
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67821
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Oct 5 15:28:06 2015
New Revision: 228490
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228490&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/67821
* tree-ssanames.c (duplicate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67852
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
??) is the trigraph for ]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67855
Bug ID: 67855
Summary: -g doesn't with x86 interrupt handler
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67854
Bug ID: 67854
Summary: Missing diagnostic for passing bool to va_arg
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67854
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I wonder if this is yet another issue with macros from system headers
(bool being defined in a system header to expand to _Bool) ... maybe we
need a systematic review of diagnostic location
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67853
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67855
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67552
Bug 67552 depends on bug 67855, which changed state.
Bug 67855 Summary: -g doesn't with x86 interrupt handler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67855
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Formal patch submission at [1].
Wine people, can someone please test that the patched compiler solves unaligned
stack access, as reported in WineHQ bug?
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg00450
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67854
--- Comment #2 from Mikhail Maltsev ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #1)
> I wonder if this is yet another issue with macros from system headers
> (bool being defined in a system header to expand to _Bool) ...
Looks like it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67814
Jameson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization
Version|5.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67856
Bug ID: 67856
Summary: callee-saved register saves should be shrink-wrapped
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67821
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Oct 5 18:39:16 2015
New Revision: 228499
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228499&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/67821
* tree-ssanames.c (duplicate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67821
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67830
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 58583, which changed state.
Bug 58583 Summary: [c++11] ICE with invalid non-static data member
initialization in template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697
--- Comment #8 from Justas L ---
I applied the first (testing) version of the patch on gcc 5.2.0 release source
(with slight modifications to make it apply). All new features work as
expected, as per the test in comment #2. However, compiling Win
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67852
--- Comment #4 from julien.boucaron at gmail dot com ---
Sorry for the waste of time
Regards
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67856
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67857
Bug ID: 67857
Summary: noreturn + volatile results in wrong code
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67857
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think you are invoking undefined behavior with overflow on signed integers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67857
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67474
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53856
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Oct 5 21:43:26 2015
New Revision: 228501
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228501&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-10-05 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/53856
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53856
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67857
--- Comment #3 from karl at skomski dot com ---
Thanks for the fast answer and sorry for wasting your time :/
Am Montag, 5. Oktober 2015 schrieb pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org :
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67857
>
> Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67834
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
This issue now breaks gcc build:
`.LC2' referenced in section
`.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN21mem_alloc_descriptionI9mem_us
ageED1Ev' of build/hash-table.o: defined in discarded section
`.gnu.linkonce.r._
ZN10hash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67834
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Re comment #2, this is with --disable-comdat added to configure command:
../gcc/configure --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --enable-shared --enable-multiarch
--enable-linker-build-id --build=hppa-linux-gnu --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67858
Bug ID: 67858
Summary: g++-5.1.1 warns about unused variable only when
optimization flag is used
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67858
--- Comment #1 from crayzeewulf ---
Here is the compiler command line and the warning:
$ g++ -Wall -std=c++11 -O3 -c bug_demo_code.cpp
bug_demo_code.cpp:34:27: warning: ‘container’ defined but not used
[-Wunused-variable]
const std::array cont
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67852
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67808
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Tue Oct 6 00:18:20 2015
New Revision: 228511
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228511&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Apply fix for PR 67808
Added:
branches/ibm/ieee/gcc/testsuite/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67856
--- Comment #2 from Andy Lutomirski ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #1)
> The call to "a" needs the prologue, maybe to align the stack?
The "subq $8, %rsp" is for stack alignment, and whether it's emitted depends on
the parity o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67856
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Currently, shrink-wrapping does not allow any call to happen without
prologue (see shrink-wrap.c:requires_stack_frame_p).
On x86-64, if you do not have a prologue but do do a call, the called
function w
-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20151005 (experimental) [trunk revision 228480] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -Os -c small.c
$ gcc-5.2 -O2 -c small.c
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 -c small.c
small.c: In function ‘fn1’:
small.c:4:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
fn1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67860
Bug ID: 67860
Summary: [concepts] bug with overloaded, refined function with
explicit and variadic template arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67861
Bug ID: 67861
Summary: coreutils' wc.c:write_counts is miscompiled since
commit 7e3a76de7c496449b187c2688d958631cf21a944
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67862
Bug ID: 67862
Summary: [concepts] ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:12625
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67861
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Justas L from comment #8)
> I applied the first (testing) version of the patch on gcc 5.2.0 release
> source (with slight modifications to make it apply). All new features work
> as expected, as pe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67861
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org,
89 matches
Mail list logo
