https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67622
--- Comment #3 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can reproduce and am looking into this, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67615
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Sep 21 18:24:52 2015
New Revision: 227982
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227982&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-09-21 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/67615
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67615
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67619
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Sep 21 19:08:38 2015
New Revision: 227984
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227984&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/67619
* except.c (expand_builtin_eh_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47781
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67619
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47781
--- Comment #16 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #15)
> Although checking the commentary on newer mainline versions of the
> _bfd_default_error_handler function, it looks like it does some additional
> weird st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67674
Bug ID: 67674
Summary: Incorrect result or ICE for deferred-length character
component
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67674
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
Bug ID: 67675
Summary: [SH] Improve __builtin_strcmp alignment test
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67676
Bug ID: 67676
Summary: Implicit alignment of struct not applied to members
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #0)
> struct S
> {
> int a, b, c;
> char s[64];// this array will be always 4 byte aligned.
> };
Currently this doesn't work, see PR 67676.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67649
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |miyuki at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67649
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67622
--- Comment #4 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've decided the revert LRA support for now. Debugging this failure is going
to be extremely time consuming, and in the meantime it's better to have the
build working properly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67622
davem at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67598
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #0)
> I still have to find out
> when the issue have started showing up, given that I now have half a year
> wide window.
6.0.0-alpha20150802 snapshot bootstraps fin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67649
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
A gave your patch a quick spin on gcc112 (compile farm machine).
It fixes the issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67141
--- Comment #6 from Chung-Lin Tang ---
Author: cltang
Date: Tue Sep 22 06:45:22 2015
New Revision: 227994
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227994&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-09-22 Chung-Lin Tang
PR libgomp/67141
* oacc-in
101 - 120 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
