[Bug c++/67533] internal compiler error: in build_call_a, at cp/call.c:372

2015-09-09 Thread chichiang_wan at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67533 --- Comment #2 from Chichiang Wan --- Created attachment 36317 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36317&action=edit second part of preprocessed file

[Bug target/56439] [avr] unnecessary spill for global and local register variables

2015-09-09 Thread thilo at tjps dot eu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56439 Thilo Schulz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thilo at tjps dot eu --- Comment #9 from

[Bug c++/67529] rx-elf C++ inherited class malformed call to overridden methods

2015-09-09 Thread ericns1 at spirilis dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67529 --- Comment #4 from Eric --- Okay, I think I've figured out what I'm looking at here. The inheritance has to do with the use of virtual functions - so the JSR vs BSR argument in here is a red herring, overridden virtual functions use JSR because

[Bug libfortran/67534] New: libgfortran.h sanitizer complains on left shift of ~0 runtime error: left shift of negative value -1

2015-09-09 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67534 Bug ID: 67534 Summary: libgfortran.h sanitizer complains on left shift of ~0 runtime error: left shift of negative value -1 Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/67529] rx-elf C++ inherited class malformed call to overridden methods

2015-09-09 Thread dj at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67529 DJ Delorie changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dj at redhat dot com --- Comment #5 from DJ

[Bug libfortran/67535] New: write.c sanitizer detects null pointer passed to memcpy

2015-09-09 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67535 Bug ID: 67535 Summary: write.c sanitizer detects null pointer passed to memcpy Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priorit

[Bug libfortran/67536] New: unix.c sanitizer detects null pointer passed to memcpy

2015-09-09 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67536 Bug ID: 67536 Summary: unix.c sanitizer detects null pointer passed to memcpy Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug sanitizer/67513] ASAN: Not optimal shadow value check (unlikely condition checked in fast path)

2015-09-09 Thread y.gribov at samsung dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67513 --- Comment #1 from Yury Gribov --- (In reply to Andrey Ryabinin from comment #0) > (shadow value is usually zero). What makes you think so? AFAIU for less-than-8-byte scalars it's always non-zero. I vaguely remember than Kostya did something li

[Bug libfortran/67535] write.c sanitizer detects null pointer passed to memcpy

2015-09-09 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67535 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

<    1   2