https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66218
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 10 07:25:55 2015
New Revision: 225650
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225650&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66218
* gcc/cp/pt.c (do_auto_deduction): Don't set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66092
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 10 07:25:49 2015
New Revision: 225649
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225649&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66092
* gcc/cp/cp-tree.h (concept_template_p): New.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 10 07:26:01 2015
New Revision: 225651
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225651&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66758
* gcc/cp/parser.c (cp_parser_requirement_para
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66823
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 10 07:53:06 2015
New Revision: 225652
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225652&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-10 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/66823
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66522
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66522
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2015-07/msg00440.html:
Author: vries
Date: Fri Jul 10 08:25:18 2015
New Revision: 225655
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225655&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Insert ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66703
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
This patch makes testcase more robust:
--cut here--
Index: readeflags-1.c
===
--- readeflags-1.c (revision 225648)
+++ readeflags-1.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66827
Bug ID: 66827
Summary: [6 Regression] left shifts of negative value warnings
due to C++14 switch
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66828
Bug ID: 66828
Summary: [5/6 Regression] gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.c:2182:38:
runtime error: left shift of 72057594037927936 by 8
places cannot be represented in type 'long int'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66822
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3)
> Please hold a bit with this change, I have a patch that improves generation
> of zero_extend substantially.
Eh, it won't have such drastic effect on code size, so if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65592
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
This issue is already fixed in mainline. I'm adding a testcase and closing it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65592
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jul 10 09:33:34 2015
New Revision: 225658
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225658&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-10 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/65592
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65592
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66775
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66780
--- Comment #6 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Fri Jul 10 09:50:18 2015
New Revision: 225660
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225660&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/66780
* config/sh/sh.md (symGOT_load): Revert a part of 2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563
--- Comment #53 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #52)
We are lucky:-) The test for backport of PR66780 patch for gcc-5 was done
and we get a chance to commit it:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg008
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563
--- Comment #54 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #53)
> (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #52)
> We are lucky:-) The test for backport of PR66780 patch for gcc-5 was done
> and we get a chance
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66820
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jul 10 10:26:19 2015
New Revision: 225661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225661&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/66820
* gimplify.c (maybe_fold_stmt): Don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65945
--- Comment #17 from npl at chello dot at ---
Hi,
so if I understand it right, the access fault itself isnt fixed, but if I use
ABI Version >= 9 it wont occur with this code?
Should I open a separate Bug for the unaligned access issue?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
I think I'll restrict the computation in unsigned only for
TYPE_OVERFLOW_SANITIZED, otherwise we fail to optimize important stuff :/ (e.g.
tree-ssa/pr23294.c).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66829
Bug ID: 66829
Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL:
23_containers/multiset/modifiers/erase/dr130-linkage-c
heck.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
No, that's not a good approach either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr23294.c should be still optimized, no? there is not a single
case with a possibly overflowing addition in there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66828
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66827
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66829
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66813
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Jul 10 11:56:48 2015
New Revision: 225662
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225662&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/66813
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_md_asm_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Right now .optimized looks like this:
f6 (int a, int b)
{
int _2;
int _4;
int _5;
:
_2 = a_1(D) * 3;
_4 = _2 - b_3(D);
_5 = _4 * 2;
return _5;
}
whereas if we compute the expression i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66813
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
With the conversion to unsigned we're also no longer able to optimize
tree-ssa/tailrecursion-6.c.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43341
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 10 12:33:28 2015
New Revision: 225671
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225671&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-10 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66794
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 10 12:33:28 2015
New Revision: 225671
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225671&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-10 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66823
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 10 12:33:28 2015
New Revision: 225671
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225671&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-10 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66703
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
> This patch makes testcase more robust:
>
> --cut here--
> Index: readeflags-1.c
> ===
> --- readeflags-1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66830
Bug ID: 66830
Summary: Problem with C++ unique symbols in plugins
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66826
--- Comment #1 from Daurnimator ---
nalaginrut (from #gcc irc channel) confirmed that the issue only occurs in GCC
5 at -O2 and higher. (the bug is *not* present in GCC 4.9 or at -O1).
Note: only the compilation of shared.so matters (the main bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66782
--- Comment #14 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Jul 10 13:17:02 2015
New Revision: 225674
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225674&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-10 Vladimir Makarov
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52749
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66782
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66372
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61991
--- Comment #1 from Ryan Johnson ---
C++14 (N3652 [1]) specifically alters the Standard to state that a thread_local
object with static or constexpr initialization may have a non-trivial
destructor (implying that such a destructor should actually
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66218
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66633
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jul 10 14:13:19 2015
New Revision: 225677
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225677&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-07-09 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66633
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66820
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jul 10 14:14:18 2015
New Revision: 225678
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225678&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/66820
* gimplify.c (maybe_fold_stmt): Don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66820
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62085
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60842
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
This is fixed in mainline. I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60842
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jul 10 14:44:43 2015
New Revision: 225679
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225679&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-10 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/60842
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60842
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21385
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|paolo.carlini at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13590
--- Comment #22 from Paolo Carlini ---
Not sure if Fabien is actively working on this..
Noticed while doing translation of the gcc messages. Please apply to trunk
if OK as I have no rfead/write access anymore AFAIK.
2015-07-10 Philipp Thomas
* params.def: fix typo.
index 3e4ba3a..08b5c7f 100644
--- a/gcc/params.def
+++ b/gcc/params.def
@@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ DEFPARAM(PARAM_VE
On 2015.07.10 at 16:58 +0200, Philipp Thomas wrote:
> Noticed while doing translation of the gcc messages. Please apply to trunk
> if OK as I have no rfead/write access anymore AFAIK.
Patches should be sent to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org.
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org is for automated Bugzilla mail only.
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66715
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66703
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Jul 10 15:32:48 2015
New Revision: 225680
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225680&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/66703
* gcc.target/i386/readeflags-1.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66353
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752
Yuri Rumyantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ysrumyan at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752
--- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Created attachment 35947
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35947&action=edit
test-case to reproduce
compile with -Ofast -m32 -march=slm and notice redundant test
.L30:
testl %e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks like bug 13876.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66831
Bug ID: 66831
Summary: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/iinline-attr-2.c scan-assembler
p2align
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
--- Comment #4 from Eric Niebler ---
Created attachment 35948
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35948&action=edit
Preprocessed source, bug the third
The previous fix caused the code in attachment #3 to stop working.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
Eric Niebler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66832
Bug ID: 66832
Summary: [concepts] parameters in requires clauses conflicting
with function arguments
Product: gcc
Version: c++-concepts
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66833
Bug ID: 66833
Summary: [4.9/5.1/6.0]: ICE on assumed-rank character actual
argument to intrinsic functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66834
Bug ID: 66834
Summary: [concepts] concept parameter kind mismatch causes hard
error
Product: gcc
Version: c++-concepts
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54521
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66835
Bug ID: 66835
Summary: C++ openMP test failed after switching to C++14
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66835
--- Comment #1 from Stupachenko Evgeny ---
wrong revision bisected. Was just bootstrap fail. Searching for really bad.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66087
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
I think combine should reject this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66819
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jul 10 20:30:10 2015
New Revision: 225688
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225688&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Allow indirect sibcall with register arguments
Indirect sibcall wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66836
Bug ID: 66836
Summary: inconsistent unqualified lookup for friend declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66835
Stupachenko Evgeny changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66837
Bug ID: 66837
Summary: Non-Native Default_Scalar_Storage_Order Breaks
Enum'Image
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66835
--- Comment #3 from Stupachenko Evgeny ---
The same reproduced on GCC 5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 10 22:11:22 2015
New Revision: 225696
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225696&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66758
* gcc/cp/pt.c (tsubst_constraint_variables):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 10 22:45:41 2015
New Revision: 225704
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225704&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66758
PR c++/66832
* gcc/cp/parser.c (cp_pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66832
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 10 22:45:41 2015
New Revision: 225704
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225704&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66758
PR c++/66832
* gcc/cp/parser.c (cp_pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66832
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54521
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jul 10 22:56:35 2015
New Revision: 225705
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225705&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-07-10 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/54521
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54521
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30044
--- Comment #8 from Patrick Palka ---
Author: ppalka
Date: Fri Jul 10 23:21:39 2015
New Revision: 225706
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225706&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/30044
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/30044
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66740
--- Comment #4 from tprince at computer dot org ---
It optimizes with implicit simd reduction and gives correct result with option
-ffast-math in place of -fopenmp.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
--- Comment #9 from Eric Niebler ---
Created attachment 35950
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35950&action=edit
Bug number 4
ICE ICE baby
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
Eric Niebler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66838
Bug ID: 66838
Summary: Calling multiple SYSV AMD64 ABI functions from MS x64
ABI one results in clobbered parameters
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66834
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
This was introduced by my patch for bug 66092, applying the tentative
resolution of core issue 1430 to concepts as well as alias templates. This
makes sense to me since they have the same issue of needing to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #11)
> Fixed.
in r225710.
91 matches
Mail list logo
