https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66633
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 9 21:14:11 2015
New Revision: 225638
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225638&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/66633
* tree-nested.c (get_static_chain): O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563
--- Comment #50 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #49)
> Kaz, please could you propose these patches for 5.2 too, even if the branch
> is currently frozen?
Btw, the main reason for most of these segfault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66812
--- Comment #10 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch posted as:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/jit/2015-q3/msg00060.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65634
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65636
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563
--- Comment #51 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #49)
> Kaz, please could you propose these patches for 5.2 too, even if the branch
> is currently frozen?
It's too late, I think.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563
--- Comment #52 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #51)
BTW, I've already committed the patch in c#37 for gcc-5 for this PR.
The backport patch for PR/66780 is still in test for gcc-5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66822
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Turn off|Turn -mtune=iamcu for size
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66822
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
X86_TUNE_USE_BT also reduces code size:
[hjl@gnu-tools-1 pr66822]$ cat y.i
void bar (void);
void
foo (int x)
{
if (x != 2 && x != 3 && x != 10 && x != 11 && x != 17 && x != 18 && x != 23)
bar ();
}
[hjl@gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66822
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> X86_TUNE_USE_BT also reduces code size:
>
> [hjl@gnu-tools-1 pr66822]$ cat y.i
> void bar (void);
>
> void
> foo (int x)
> {
> if (x != 2 && x != 3 && x != 10 && x != 11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66092
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64848
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
This is fixed for 5.2. I'm adding a testcase and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66169
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64848
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jul 10 02:44:39 2015
New Revision: 225648
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225648&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-09 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/64848
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64848
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 64848, which changed state.
Bug 64848 Summary: G++ internal compiler error with templated lambdas capturing
variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64848
What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66826
Bug ID: 66826
Summary: Unused dlsym return results in segfault
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
101 - 117 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
