https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60670
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.4 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66509
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zanpeeters at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54114
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Target Milestone|4.9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64540
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66685
Bug ID: 66685
Summary: [6 Regression] conftest.c:16:1: internal compiler
error: in as_a, at is-a.h:192
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66067
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 26 20:33:41 2015
New Revision: 225083
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225083&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66067
* mangle.c (write_nested_name): Limit TYPENA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66654
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 26 20:33:35 2015
New Revision: 225082
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225082&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66654
* typeck2.c (digest_init_r): Only expect resh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66255
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 26 20:33:46 2015
New Revision: 225084
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225084&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66255
* pt.c (check_unstripped_args): Split out fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66067
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 26 20:35:06 2015
New Revision: 225085
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225085&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66067
* mangle.c (write_template_args): Handle 0 l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60290
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.4 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66685
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66685
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|FIX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66684
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 26 21:31:08 2015
New Revision: 225086
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225086&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66684
* typeck2.c (merge_exception_specifiers): All
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66216
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 26 21:31:13 2015
New Revision: 225087
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225087&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66216
* class.c (finish_struct): Call fixup_attribu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66216
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 26 21:41:34 2015
New Revision: 225088
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225088&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66216
* class.c (finish_struct): Call fixup_attribu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66216
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66684
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
Bug ID: 66686
Summary: Instantiation of dependent template template parameter
with non-dependent template rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66685
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
Backtrace:
Breakpoint 1, _Z4as_aIP13rtx_jump_insn8rtx_insnET_PT0_ (p=0x7ae2beb0)
at ../../gcc/gcc/is-a.h:192
192 gcc_checking_assert (is_a (p));
(gdb) bt
Python Exception Failed to load
/home
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66687
Bug ID: 66687
Summary: WPA link fau: internal compiler error: bytecode
stream: found non-null terminated string
Product: gcc
Version: lto
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66687
--- Comment #1 from Guido Haztsis ---
Created attachment 35861
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35861&action=edit
preproc source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66687
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Are you sure that this is not a bug in musl?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Comment #47 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Jun 27 00:46:58 2015
New Revision: 225094
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225094&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2015-06-25 Oleg Endo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66611
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Jun 27 00:46:58 2015
New Revision: 225094
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225094&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2015-06-25 Oleg Endo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66611
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66687
--- Comment #3 from Guido Haztsis ---
Musl claims that they support LTO. Also all that I have changed was bumping gcc
from the 5.1_release tag to the latest overnight commit.
The res file doesn't even include libc.so (nor libc.a for a static bui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66687
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
MUSL support is not included in GCC 5.x is another thing. Also you are using
x32 which is not tested that much.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66620
--- Comment #2 from Chen Gang ---
(In reply to Mikhail Maltsev from comment #1)
> Started with r208165.
OK, thanks. Really it is, it is valuable to me (it can generate the correct
insns for comparing). And also if remove "-fno-reorder-blocks", i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66620
--- Comment #3 from Chen Gang ---
Created attachment 35862
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35862&action=edit
The insns for our issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66620
--- Comment #4 from Chen Gang ---
Created attachment 35863
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35863&action=edit
The correct insns without -fno-reorder-blocks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66620
--- Comment #5 from Chen Gang ---
Created attachment 35864
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35864&action=edit
The correct insns should be with -fno-reorder-blocks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66642
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from vrie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66652
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35865
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35865&action=edit
follow-up patch for demonstrator patch
This patch in addition allows transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66688
Bug ID: 66688
Summary: [6 Regression] compare debug failure building Linux
kernel on ppc64le
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66685
--- Comment #4 from Mikhail Maltsev ---
Revision number r225078 looks wrong to me: it's a release tag for v. 4.9.3 (and
line numbers in the backtrace do not match with the source code of that
revision)
601 - 635 of 635 matches
Mail list logo