https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Comment #2 from Antonio Poggiali ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #1)
> Obvious "dumb" question given this is a cross-environnment - I'm assuming
> that you have the same libstdc++ in both places ?
Yes, it is the same. I've
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66412
--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Jun 26 07:45:07 2015
New Revision: 224994
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224994&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/66412
* config/i386/i386.md (various spl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65711
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65371
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66633
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
The error mark is inserted by omp-low.c:omp_copy_decl for FRAME.1:
spl ()
{
static real(kind=8) fli (void);
struct FRAME.spl FRAME.1;
__builtin_init_trampoline (&FRAME.1.fli, fli, &FRAME.1);
#pragma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66633
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
The problem is that the FRAME variable is created too late for the GOMP
machinery in tree-nested.c to handle it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66633
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|fortran |middle-end
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65371
--- Comment #4 from Stuart ---
The assembly generated from Comment #1 looks good.
However, the assembly generated from Comment #3 hasn't improved, it still
contains the unnecessary mov instruction on line 2 (mov r2, r3).
The first instruction m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66648
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66412
--- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Jun 26 10:30:37 2015
New Revision: 225006
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225006&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/66412
* config/i386/i386.md (various sp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66677
Bug ID: 66677
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: in vect_transform_stmt, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:7626
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66677
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
trippels@gcc2-power8 libyuv_libyuv % cat row_common.ii
int *a, *b;
void fn1(char *p1) {
int x;
for (; x; x += 2) {
a[x] = p1[0];
a[x + 1] = 0;
b[x] = b[x + 1] = p1[1];
p1 += 4;
}
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66638
--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Fri Jun 26 11:12:20 2015
New Revision: 225008
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225008&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/66638
* tree-ssa-loop-niter.c (loo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66678
Bug ID: 66678
Summary: loop counter not accurately described by vrp
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Poggiali ---
I've understand a little better the problem.
The compiler passes to std::list copy constructor a different address respect
to the destination variable.
This causes size() call to fail (endless loop or seg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Comment #4 from Antonio Poggiali ---
I've understand a little better the problem.
The compiler passes to std::list copy constructor a different address respect
to the destination variable.
This causes size() call to fail (endless loop or seg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66648
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Untested patch:
--cut here--
Index: config/i386/i386.c
===
--- config/i386/i386.c (revision 224993)
+++ config/i386/i386.c (working copy)
@@ -2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66677
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g |
|nu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Comment #5 from Antonio Poggiali ---
Sorry but this comment is incorrect. See the next one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66679
Bug ID: 66679
Summary: ICE with class(*) and transfer
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66678
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I.
(In reply to vries from comment #0)
> AFAIU:
> - the loop iv i_1 has range [0, 4294967294], and
This bit is incorrect. i_1 can actually be 4294967295.
II.
With this demonstrator patch:
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66680
Bug ID: 66680
Summary: ICE with openmp, a loop and a type bound procedure
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66680
--- Comment #1 from Miha Polajnar ---
Created attachment 35856
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35856&action=edit
Source code for the described bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64134
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66681
Bug ID: 66681
Summary: Wrong result in assigning this_image() to a complex
coarray
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66638
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
r225008 gave me:
../../src-trunk/gcc/../libcpp/include/line-map.h: In function
‘linemap_check_ordinary’:
../../src-trunk/gcc/../libcpp/include/line-map.h:325:10: internal compiler
error: in check_die, at dwarf2out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66682
Bug ID: 66682
Summary: Lots of macro expansion, very slow compilation
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66682
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Jun 26 14:59:11 2015
New Revision: 225019
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225019&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR 66301 - check for dump_file in eliminate_dom_walker::before_dom_c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66682
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Note that this code is not really "stand-alone": See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66638
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66682
cr88192 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.8.2
--- Comment #3 from cr88
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66683
Bug ID: 66683
Summary: Large macro with float multiplications fails
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66682
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66680
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66680
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[Regression 5] ICE with |[5 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66605
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Jun 26 17:13:51 2015
New Revision: 225023
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225023&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR 66301.
2015-06-26 Martin Jambor
PR debug/66301
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66684
Bug ID: 66684
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in merge_exception_specifiers, at
cp/typeck2.c:2114
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-inv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
--- Comment #59 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61763
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58893
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42108
--- Comment #71 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55943
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12245
--- Comment #58 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47481
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60500
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66178
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33781
--- Comment #36 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37633
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56852
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57955
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56049
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62231
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36443
--- Comment #62 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50210
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57413
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24976
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66137
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50421
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54063
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54114
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63347
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28831
--- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56069
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59124
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56145
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64172
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40060
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57218
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65355
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59586
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39838
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59781
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59490
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65061
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60795
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60576
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64928
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61908
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49775
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62016
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58981
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60526
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65542
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63191
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47679
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65821
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59507
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59908
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55278
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55181
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20617
--- Comment #37 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20285
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60736
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54699
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
1 - 100 of 635 matches
Mail list logo