[Bug rtl-optimization/64818] User specified register don't work correctly in inline-asm operands.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64818 --- Comment #2 from halewang at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: halewang Date: Wed Jun 3 07:17:23 2015 New Revision: 224057 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224057&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Hale Wang Backport from mainline r2

[Bug tree-optimization/66388] [6 Regression] Test gcc.target/i386/pr49781-1.c failed because of recent scev overflow patches.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66388 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/66391] suboptimal code for assignment of SImode struct with bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66391 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug c++/66383] [5/6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr on this passed in inline initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66383 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/66272] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66272 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 07:39:06 2015 New Revision: 224059 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224059&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/62031] [4.8 Regression] Different results between O2 and O2 -fpredictive-commoning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031 --- Comment #18 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 07:39:06 2015 New Revision: 224059 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224059&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug tree-optimization/66123] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Array of labels as values + ternary operator + pointer arithmetic = internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66123 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 07:39:06 2015 New Revision: 224059 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224059&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug c++/66211] [5 Regression] Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66211 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 07:39:06 2015 New Revision: 224059 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224059&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug debug/65549] [4.9 Regression] crash in htab_hash_string with -flto -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65549 --- Comment #34 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 07:39:06 2015 New Revision: 224059 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224059&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug tree-optimization/66280] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE: in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1472

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66280 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 07:39:06 2015 New Revision: 224059 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224059&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug c++/66211] [5 Regression] Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66211 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/65961] [6 Regression] ice in vect_is_simple_use_1 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65961 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/59048] operator== between std::string and const char* slower than strcmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59048 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug middle-end/66375] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66375 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 07:57:13 2015 New Revision: 224060 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224060&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/66375

[Bug tree-optimization/63916] value-numbering fails to forward variable addresses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63916 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 08:02:10 2015 New Revision: 224061 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224061&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/63916

[Bug tree-optimization/66142] Loop is not vectorized because not sufficient support for GOMP_SIMD_LANE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66142 Bug 66142 depends on bug 63916, which changed state. Bug 63916 Summary: value-numbering fails to forward variable addresses https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63916 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/63916] value-numbering fails to forward variable addresses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63916 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66392] New: rejects-valid: copy-initialization through user-defined conversion sequence fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66392 Bug ID: 66392 Summary: rejects-valid: copy-initialization through user-defined conversion sequence fails Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keyword

[Bug c/29358] Warning issued two times with snprintf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29358 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Jun 3 08:24:50 2015 New Revision: 224062 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224062&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/64223 PR c/29358 * tree.c (attribute_value

[Bug c/64223] same warning repeated twice with same line number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64223 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Jun 3 08:24:50 2015 New Revision: 224062 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224062&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/64223 PR c/29358 * tree.c (attribute_value

[Bug c++/53431] C++ preprocessor ignores #pragma GCC diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431 --- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Created attachment 35688 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35688&action=edit WIP patch A WIP patch. I took a different approach: Move the handling of the pragma to the preprocessor.

[Bug c/64223] same warning repeated twice with same line number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64223 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/65366] gdbhooks.py is incompatible with Python3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65366 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/29358] Warning issued two times with snprintf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29358 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/66098] #pragma diagnostic 'ignored' not fully undone by pop for strict-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66098 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/66387] [5/6 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl with lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66387 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/66099] _Pragma diagnostic 'ignored' in macro with strict-overflow not suppressing warning fully with -Werror

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66099 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/66358] [5/6 Regression] [SH] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2232

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66358 --- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #7) > (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #6) > > There could be some negative side effects with the patch above, because it > > forces the R0 usage quite early (at RTL e

[Bug rtl-optimization/66393] New: register asm input for inline asm not respected when using a template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66393 Bug ID: 66393 Summary: register asm input for inline asm not respected when using a template Product: gcc Version: 4.8.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/33661] template methods forget explicit local reg vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33661 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/66393] register asm input for inline asm not respected when using a template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66393 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/66394] New: ICE in -flto -fmerge-all-constants -fno-use-linker-plugin targetting i686-w64-mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66394 Bug ID: 66394 Summary: ICE in -flto -fmerge-all-constants -fno-use-linker-plugin targetting i686-w64-mingw32 Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug other/66394] ICE in -flto -fmerge-all-constants -fno-use-linker-plugin targetting i686-w64-mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66394 --- Comment #1 from Stanisław Halik --- Created attachment 35689 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35689&action=edit preprocessed source of ICE

[Bug middle-end/66251] [6 Regression] ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1484

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66251 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 11:03:26 2015 New Revision: 224072 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224072&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug tree-optimization/66272] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66272 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 11:03:26 2015 New Revision: 224072 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224072&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/65518] [4.8/4.9 Regression] gcc consumes all memory with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65518 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 11:03:26 2015 New Revision: 224072 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224072&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/66123] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Array of labels as values + ternary operator + pointer arithmetic = internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66123 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 11:03:26 2015 New Revision: 224072 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224072&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/62031] [4.8 Regression] Different results between O2 and O2 -fpredictive-commoning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031 --- Comment #19 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 11:03:26 2015 New Revision: 224072 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224072&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug debug/65549] [4.9 Regression] crash in htab_hash_string with -flto -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65549 --- Comment #35 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 11:03:26 2015 New Revision: 224072 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224072&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug target/66395] New: [SH]: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints: when building gcc-5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66395 Bug ID: 66395 Summary: [SH]: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints: when building gcc-5 Product: gcc Version: unknown URL: http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status

[Bug tree-optimization/66396] New: [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-pr47593.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66396 Bug ID: 66396 Summary: [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-pr47593.c execution test Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug go/66303] runtime.Caller() returns infinitely deep stack frames on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66303 --- Comment #9 from Dominik Vogt --- The problem is reproduceable with the makecontext C testcases in Glibc (with some manual intervention). So, this isn't a Go related problem. Our analysis so far seems to indicate that it's a bug in the s390x

[Bug tree-optimization/66396] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-pr47593.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66396 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/66395] [SH]: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints: when building gcc-5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66395 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/66358] [5/6 Regression] [SH] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2232

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66358 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.d

[Bug target/66395] [SH]: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints: when building gcc-5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66395 --- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #1) > Dup of PR 66358. > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 66358 *** Hmm, I thought 66358 was already fixed.

[Bug target/66395] [SH]: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints: when building gcc-5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66395 --- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #2) > Hmm, I thought 66358 was already fixed. Oh, that's a different one. Sorry, my bad.

[Bug c/66397] New: sanitize=undefined triggers extra -Warray-bounds warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66397 Bug ID: 66397 Summary: sanitize=undefined triggers extra -Warray-bounds warning Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c/66397] sanitize=undefined triggers extra -Warray-bounds warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66397 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Comment on attachment 35691 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35691 testcase, warns with gcc-6 -c -O2 -fsanitize=undefined Except it is undefined behavior to have one element before the st

[Bug c/66397] sanitize=undefined triggers extra -Warray-bounds warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66397 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/66396] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-pr47593.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66396 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/66397] sanitize=undefined triggers extra -Warray-bounds warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66397 --- Comment #3 from Franz Sirl --- Yeah, I feared so :-(. This is a bit unfortunate though, as for our code base we compile with -Werror=array-bounds, now when I add -fsanitize=undefined I need to downgrade the error to a warning again. Another s

[Bug tree-optimization/66396] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-pr47593.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66396 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- on x86_64 with -m32 btw

[Bug go/66368] [5 Regression] go tool crashes on powerpc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66368 --- Comment #6 from boger at us dot ibm.com --- I think you've said the problem only occurs when using -fstack-protector-strong and when building with glibc-2.21. Have you tried using gdb to see where the segv actually occurs? >gdb go . >r

[Bug fortran/66386] ICE: FORALL reading multiple elements from one array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66386 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/66385] ICE: FORALL writing multiple elements of one array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66385 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 66386 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/66398] New: g++.dg/abi/anon1.C FAILs with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66398 Bug ID: 66398 Summary: g++.dg/abi/anon1.C FAILs with PIE Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Ass

[Bug c++/66398] g++.dg/abi/anon1.C FAILs with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66398 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug go/66303] runtime.Caller() returns infinitely deep stack frames on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66303 --- Comment #10 from Dominik Vogt --- Just a short update before the bank holiday weekend in Germany. The problem is caused by missing cfi directives in the Glibc sources. We'll open a Glibc bug report and provide a patch next week. Gdb has so

[Bug c++/66399] New: g++.dg/abi/anon4.C FAILs with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66399 Bug ID: 66399 Summary: g++.dg/abi/anon4.C FAILs with PIE Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Ass

[Bug c++/66399] g++.dg/abi/anon4.C FAILs with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66399 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug c++/66400] New: g++.dg/stackprotectexplicit2.C FAILs with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66400 Bug ID: 66400 Summary: g++.dg/stackprotectexplicit2.C FAILs with PIE Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/66400] g++.dg/stackprotectexplicit2.C FAILs with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66400 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug fortran/66385] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: FORALL writing multiple elements of one array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66385 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/66401] New: g++.dg/ubsan/vla-1.C FAILs with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66401 Bug ID: 66401 Summary: g++.dg/ubsan/vla-1.C FAILs with PIE Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer

[Bug sanitizer/66401] g++.dg/ubsan/vla-1.C FAILs with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66401 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug c/66402] New: gcc.dg/uninit-19.c FAILs with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66402 Bug ID: 66402 Summary: gcc.dg/uninit-19.c FAILs with PIE Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assig

[Bug c/66402] gcc.dg/uninit-19.c FAILs with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66402 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug c/66403] New: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-self.c FAILs with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66403 Bug ID: 66403 Summary: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-self.c FAILs with PIE Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/66403] gcc.dg/torture/builtin-self.c FAILs with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66403 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug c/66404] New: gcc.target/i386/pad-10.c etc. FAIL with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66404 Bug ID: 66404 Summary: gcc.target/i386/pad-10.c etc. FAIL with PIE Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/66404] gcc.target/i386/pad-10.c etc. FAIL with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66404 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug fortran/66366] ICE on invalid with non-allocatable CLASS variable [OOP]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66366 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery,

[Bug c++/66405] New: [5/6 Regression] ICE: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:11984

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66405 Bug ID: 66405 Summary: [5/6 Regression] ICE: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:11984 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/66405] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:11984

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66405 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Created attachment 35692 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35692&action=edit unreduced testcase

[Bug go/66406] New: go.test/test/nilptr.go FAILs with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66406 Bug ID: 66406 Summary: go.test/test/nilptr.go FAILs with PIE Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug go/66406] go.test/test/nilptr.go FAILs with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66406 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug middle-end/66251] [6 Regression] ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1484

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66251 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 13:50:11 2015 New Revision: 224081 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224081&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug tree-optimization/62031] [4.8 Regression] Different results between O2 and O2 -fpredictive-commoning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031 --- Comment #20 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 13:50:11 2015 New Revision: 224081 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224081&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug tree-optimization/65518] [4.8 Regression] gcc consumes all memory with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65518 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/65518] [4.8 Regression] gcc consumes all memory with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65518 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 13:50:11 2015 New Revision: 224081 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224081&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/66272] [4.8 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66272 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 13:50:11 2015 New Revision: 224081 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224081&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/66123] [4.8 Regression] Array of labels as values + ternary operator + pointer arithmetic = internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66123 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 13:50:11 2015 New Revision: 224081 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224081&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug tree-optimization/66123] [4.8 Regression] Array of labels as values + ternary operator + pointer arithmetic = internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66123 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/66272] [4.8 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66272 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|4.8.4

[Bug libgomp/66407] New: libgomp.c/examples-4/e.53.5.c etc. FAIL with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66407 Bug ID: 66407 Summary: libgomp.c/examples-4/e.53.5.c etc. FAIL with PIE Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: li

[Bug libgomp/66407] libgomp.c/examples-4/e.53.5.c etc. FAIL with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66407 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug c++/66405] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:11984

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66405 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Creduce came up with: template struct A; template struct enable_if; template struct B; template using and_c = A>; template using Constructible = int; template struct common_tuple { template <

[Bug c++/66405] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:11984

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66405 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/32394] some operations to not work properly in df_deferred_rescan mode.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32394 --- Comment #2 from Kenneth Zadeck --- yeh

[Bug c++/30044] ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:7359

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30044 ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug libgomp/65611] examples-4/e.53.5.c examples-4/e.53.5.f90 don't work with -fPIE -pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65611 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from H.J.

[Bug libgomp/66407] libgomp.c/examples-4/e.53.5.c etc. FAIL with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66407 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/66251] [6 Regression] ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1484

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66251 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12

[Bug other/66394] [5/6 Regression] ICE in -flto -fmerge-all-constants -fno-use-linker-plugin targetting i686-w64-mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66394 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Reduced test case: $ cat color.ii template void CvtColorLoop(int, int, const Cvt &); enum { R2Y, G2Y, B2Y }; struct RGB2Gray { RGB2Gray(int, int, int coeffs) { const int coeffs0[]{G2Y, B2Y}; coeffs

[Bug target/65368] [4.8/4.9 Regression]_bzhi_u32 intrinsic generates incorrect code when -O1 or above is specified and index is an immediate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65368 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jun 3 15:26:15 2015 New Revision: 224085 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224085&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2015-03-10 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/65427] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn with wide vector types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65427 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jun 3 15:26:56 2015 New Revision: 224086 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224086&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2015-03-16 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/65450] [4.9 Regression]: Unaligned access with -O3 -mtune=k8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65450 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jun 3 15:27:43 2015 New Revision: 224087 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224087&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2015-03-18 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/65504] [4.9 Regression] select case with strings and -fgcse -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jun 3 15:30:58 2015 New Revision: 224089 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224089&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Jakub Jelinek Backported from mainline 201

[Bug gcov-profile/64634] [4.8/4.9 Regression] gcov reports catch(...) as not executed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64634 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jun 3 15:25:15 2015 New Revision: 224084 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224084&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2015-02-18 Jakub Jelinek

  1   2   >