[Bug lto/66229] LTO fails with -fauto-profile on mcf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66229 Dehao Chen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dehao at google dot com --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c++/39478] please improve recursive template instantiation diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39478 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #6 from Manuel Lóp

[Bug libgcc/66225] libgcc/config/rs6000/morecore.S will not build on systems with an older assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66225 --- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Wed May 20 21:39:40 2015 New Revision: 223463 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223463&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR 66225 fix Modified: branches/ibm/ieee-submit/libgcc/config/r

[Bug target/63810] gcc sets incorrect macro for OS X deployment targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810 --- Comment #25 from Lawrence Velázquez --- (In reply to m...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #22) > Though I approved it on list, you should feel free to update with the review > points others have and post that version if you wish. Re-roll posted: ht

[Bug c/66230] New: Using optimizations causes program to segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66230 Bug ID: 66230 Summary: Using optimizations causes program to segfault Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug libgcc/66212] Exception handling broken on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66212 --- Comment #3 from Andri Yngvason --- This is the libgcc that I built. I put it there. However, it is entirely within the realm of possibility that it may have been stripped on it's way there via dpkg. I'll try copying it there directly. Thanks!

[Bug c++/66231] New: -Werror=zero-as-null-pointer-constant - errors on -isystem function default values of NULL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66231 Bug ID: 66231 Summary: -Werror=zero-as-null-pointer-constant - errors on -isystem function default values of NULL Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgcc/66225] libgcc/config/rs6000/morecore.S will not build on systems with an older assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66225 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Wed May 20 23:55:08 2015 New Revision: 223464 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223464&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libgcc/66225 * config/rs6000/morestack.S: Remove ".abiver

[Bug libgcc/66225] libgcc/config/rs6000/morecore.S will not build on systems with an older assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66225 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug debug/61033] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Infinite loop in variable tracking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61033 Michael Collison changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|michael.collison at linaro dot org |mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/66232] New: -fPIC -fno-plt -mx32 fails to generate indirect branch via GOT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66232 Bug ID: 66232 Summary: -fPIC -fno-plt -mx32 fails to generate indirect branch via GOT Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug target/66232] -fPIC -fno-plt -mx32 fails to generate indirect branch via GOT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66232 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- We can add patterns to support (call (mem:QI (zero_extend:DI (mem/u/c:SI (const:SI (unspec:SI [ (symbol_ref:SI ("bar") [flags 0x41] ) ] UNSPEC_GOTPCREL)) [1 S4

[Bug fortran/66079] [6 Regression] memory leak with source allocation in internal subprogram

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66079 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 35583 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35583&action=edit Further advanced patch This version fixes non-character allocatable scalar functions. Now, only allocatable chara

[Bug lto/66180] [6 Regression] many -Wodr false positives when building LLVM with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66180 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka --- I can reproduce these now, too. Indeed it is a bug - there is template instantiated with anonymous namespace parameter that makes it also anonymous. Sadly my fix for the false positives of type_in_anonymous_na

[Bug c/66230] Using optimizations causes program to segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66230 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/66215] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong after label NOP emission for -mhotpatch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215 --- Comment #5 from Dominik Vogt --- Wouldn't the correct and easy to identify place be right after the first NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK?

[Bug c/66233] New: internal compiler error: in expand_fix, at optabs.c:5358

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66233 Bug ID: 66233 Summary: internal compiler error: in expand_fix, at optabs.c:5358 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c/52952] Wformat location info is bad (wrong column number)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952 --- Comment #38 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Author: manu Date: Thu May 21 06:49:38 2015 New Revision: 223470 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223470&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2015-05-21 Manuel López-Ibáñez

<    1   2