[Bug target/66140] New: ICE at extract_insn, at recog.c:2343 when compiling for alpha with gcc-5.1.1

2015-05-14 Thread dhowells at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66140 Bug ID: 66140 Summary: ICE at extract_insn, at recog.c:2343 when compiling for alpha with gcc-5.1.1 Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug c/66127] Division by zero gets folded away

2015-05-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66127 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |c --- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---

[Bug fortran/66141] New: Invalid code generation with -O1, -O2, -O3 for x86_64 target for array reference in Fortran COMMON

2015-05-14 Thread george at gly dot bris.ac.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66141 Bug ID: 66141 Summary: Invalid code generation with -O1, -O2, -O3 for x86_64 target for array reference in Fortran COMMON Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/66141] Invalid code generation with -O1, -O2, -O3 for x86_64 target for array reference in Fortran COMMON

2015-05-14 Thread george at gly dot bris.ac.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66141 --- Comment #1 from george at gly dot bris.ac.uk --- uname -m -r -s -p output: Darwin 13.4.0 x86_64 i386

[Bug fortran/66141] Invalid code generation with -O1, -O2, -O3 for x86_64 target for array reference in Fortran COMMON

2015-05-14 Thread george at gly dot bris.ac.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66141 --- Comment #2 from george at gly dot bris.ac.uk --- #gfortran -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gfortran COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/Cellar/gcc/4.9.2/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0/4.9.2/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-14 Thread thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug fortran/53086] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

2015-05-14 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||george at gly dot bris.ac.uk ---

[Bug fortran/66141] Invalid code generation with -O1, -O2, -O3 for x86_64 target for array reference in Fortran COMMON

2015-05-14 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66141 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think the right solution is just to stop using AC_STRUCT_DIRENT_D_TYPE which expands to the opendir link test. The autoconf manual doesn't say anything about it doing a link test, I was only trying to fi

[Bug rtl-optimization/63277] ARM - NEON excessive use of vmov for vtbl2 / uint8x8x2 for shuffling data unnecessarily around

2015-05-14 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63277 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra CC|

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-14 Thread thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9) > I think the right solution is just to stop using AC_STRUCT_DIRENT_D_TYPE > which expands to the opendir link test. > > The autoconf manual doesn't say an

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- It seems very intentional, not a bug. I have a patch to stop using it but I can't regenerate the configure script because of the move to automake-1.11.6

[Bug c/66127] Division by zero gets folded away

2015-05-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66127 --- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu May 14 11:42:53 2015 New Revision: 223193 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223193&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/66066 PR c/66127 * c-common.c (c_fully_fo

[Bug c/66066] [6 Regression] r222889 causes bogus error: initializer element is not constant

2015-05-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66066 --- Comment #18 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu May 14 11:42:53 2015 New Revision: 223193 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223193&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/66066 PR c/66127 * c-common.c (c_fully_fo

[Bug c/66127] Division by zero gets folded away

2015-05-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66127 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/66066] [6 Regression] r222889 causes bogus error: initializer element is not constant

2015-05-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66066 Bug 66066 depends on bug 66127, which changed state. Bug 66127 Summary: Division by zero gets folded away https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66127 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c/66066] [6 Regression] r222889 causes bogus error: initializer element is not constant

2015-05-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66066 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu May 14 11:47:19 2015 New Revision: 223194 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223194&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/66018 * acinclude.m4 (GLIBCXX_CHECK_FILESYS

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |6.0 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wake

[Bug c++/66121] internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1369

2015-05-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66121 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/66061] [5/6 Regression] Internal Compiler Error when specializing a variable template when the specialization is variadic

2015-05-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66061 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/66130] "invalid use of non-static member function" message could be clearer

2015-05-14 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66130 --- Comment #5 from Tom Tromey --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #4) > For this testcase, my patch gives: > > test.cc:8:34: error: invalid use of non-static member function ‘void X::m()’ That seems great to me.

[Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split

2015-05-14 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955 --- Comment #16 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu May 14 13:16:32 2015 New Revision: 223195 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223195&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] Fix PR 65955: Do not take REGNO on non-REG operand

[Bug libstdc++/66011] [6 Regression] call to '__open_missing_mode' declared with attribute error

2015-05-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66011 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu May 14 13:23:14 2015 New Revision: 223196 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223196&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/66011 * acinclude.m4 (GLIBCXX_CHECK_FILESYST

[Bug libstdc++/66011] [6 Regression] call to '__open_missing_mode' declared with attribute error

2015-05-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66011 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/66055] hash containers missing required reserving constructors

2015-05-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66055 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu May 14 13:47:19 2015 New Revision: 223198 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223198&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-05-14 Nathan Myers Jonathan Wakely PR libs

[Bug libstdc++/66055] hash containers missing required reserving constructors

2015-05-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66055 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/66142] New: Loop is not vectorized because not sufficient support for GOMP_SIMD_LANE

2015-05-14 Thread ysrumyan at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66142 Bug ID: 66142 Summary: Loop is not vectorized because not sufficient support for GOMP_SIMD_LANE Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/66142] Loop is not vectorized because not sufficient support for GOMP_SIMD_LANE

2015-05-14 Thread ysrumyan at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66142 --- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Created attachment 35541 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35541&action=edit test-case to reproduce Must be compiled with -Ofast -fopenmp -march=core-avx2 options.

[Bug rtl-optimization/65862] [MIPS] IRA/LRA issue: integers spilled to floating-point registers

2015-05-14 Thread wdijkstr at arm dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65862 --- Comment #13 from Wilco --- (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #9) > Created attachment 35503 [details] > ira-hook.patch > > Here is the patch. Could you try it and give me your opinion about it. > Thanks. I tried it out and when f

[Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split

2015-05-14 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug ada/66143] New: __gnat_set_executable insufficient for correct gprinstall

2015-05-14 Thread jeditekunum at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66143 Bug ID: 66143 Summary: __gnat_set_executable insufficient for correct gprinstall Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug target/66144] New: vector element operator produces very bad code

2015-05-14 Thread mkg at us dot ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66144 Bug ID: 66144 Summary: vector element operator produces very bad code Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/66144] vector element operator produces very bad code

2015-05-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66144 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Version|tree-ssa|4.9.0 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug target/66144] vector element operator produces very bad code

2015-05-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66144 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I suspect a == b is all equals and not element by element equals. I am wrong. >From the manual: Vector comparison is supported with standard comparison operator

[Bug c++/66130] "invalid use of non-static member function" message could be clearer

2015-05-14 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66130 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug other/63513] Error to build gcc loaded from svn

2015-05-14 Thread zfefm at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63513 zf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zfefm at gmx dot de --- Comment #2 from zf --- I h

[Bug libstdc++/66145] New: std::ios_base::failure objects thrown from libstdc++.so use old ABI

2015-05-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66145 Bug ID: 66145 Summary: std::ios_base::failure objects thrown from libstdc++.so use old ABI Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ABI

[Bug libstdc++/66146] New: call_once not C++11-compliant on ppc64le

2015-05-14 Thread andrey.vul at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146 Bug ID: 66146 Summary: call_once not C++11-compliant on ppc64le Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc+

[Bug go/66147] New: [5/6 Regression] go fails to cross build

2015-05-14 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66147 Bug ID: 66147 Summary: [5/6 Regression] go fails to cross build Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug target/66140] ICE at extract_insn, at recog.c:2343 when compiling for alpha with gcc-5.1.1

2015-05-14 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66140 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/66148] New: [6 regression] build/genpreds: Internal error: abort in choose_enum_order, at genpreds.c:1006

2015-05-14 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66148 Bug ID: 66148 Summary: [6 regression] build/genpreds: Internal error: abort in choose_enum_order, at genpreds.c:1006 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/66149] New: ICE: tree check: expected field_decl, have template_decl in int_bit_position, at tree.h:5012 with -std=c++14 -gstabs

2015-05-14 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66149 Bug ID: 66149 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected field_decl, have template_decl in int_bit_position, at tree.h:5012 with -std=c++14 -gstabs Product: gcc Version:

[Bug c++/66150] New: [C++11] cv-qualifiers on function types are not ignored.

2015-05-14 Thread eric at efcs dot ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66150 Bug ID: 66150 Summary: [C++11] cv-qualifiers on function types are not ignored. Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug fortran/65903] [5/6 Regression] Line continuation followed by comment character in string fails to compile

2015-05-14 Thread laurent.chardon at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65903 --- Comment #4 from Laurent Chardon --- Thanks for the fix. If I may suggest a modification of the testcase in order to check also when there are no blanks between the & and !. I know in Fortran it shouldn't matter, but I don't see any harm in ma

[Bug c++/66151] New: different "override" options

2015-05-14 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66151 Bug ID: 66151 Summary: different "override" options Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assign

[Bug target/66144] vector element operator produces very bad code

2015-05-14 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66144 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/65862] [MIPS] IRA/LRA issue: integers spilled to floating-point registers

2015-05-14 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65862 --- Comment #14 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Thu May 14 20:40:44 2015 New Revision: 223202 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223202&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-05-14 Vladimir Makarov PR rtl-optimization/65862

[Bug rtl-optimization/66152] New: suboptimal load bytes to stack

2015-05-14 Thread SztfG at yandex dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66152 Bug ID: 66152 Summary: suboptimal load bytes to stack Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug ipa/65972] ICE after applying a patch to enable verify_ssa

2015-05-14 Thread dehao at google dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65972 --- Comment #5 from Dehao Chen --- Could you try if the following patch fixes the bug? Thanks, Dehao Index: gcc/auto-profile.c === --- gcc/auto-profile.c (revision 223204) +++ gcc

[Bug c++/66153] New: Internal compiler error in nested template function

2015-05-14 Thread paboyle at ph dot ed.ac.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66153 Bug ID: 66153 Summary: Internal compiler error in nested template function Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component

[Bug rtl-optimization/66152] suboptimal load bytes to stack

2015-05-14 Thread SztfG at yandex dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66152 --- Comment #1 from SztfG at yandex dot ru --- If array of char is initialized using string, gcc can use larger mov instruction, like movabsq, movq, movl etc. but not movdqa, movaps or other xmm But if zero byte appears in string, compiler always

[Bug testsuite/66154] New: ReserveShadowMemoryRange test suite errors when memory overcommitting is turned off on Linux

2015-05-14 Thread f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66154 Bug ID: 66154 Summary: ReserveShadowMemoryRange test suite errors when memory overcommitting is turned off on Linux Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/66154] ReserveShadowMemoryRange test suite errors when memory overcommitting is turned off on Linux

2015-05-14 Thread f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66154 --- Comment #1 from Frank Heckenbach --- Somehow this got sent before the text was inserted, so here goes: Also reported on Debian, but I was asked to report it here: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785249 When I tried to buil

[Bug sanitizer/66154] ReserveShadowMemoryRange test suite errors when memory overcommitting is turned off on Linux

2015-05-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66154 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-14 Thread thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #13) > This should be fixed now, please check. It is indeed. Thanks.

[Bug target/63810] gcc sets incorrect macro for OS X deployment targets

2015-05-14 Thread vq at larryv dot me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810 --- Comment #20 from Lawrence Velázquez --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #18) > (In reply to Lawrence Velázquez from comment #17) > > Hey Lawrence, do you have a copyright assignment in place with the FSF? If > so, please su