[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-13 Thread kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 --- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- For aarch64-none-elf it fails during. 01:53:39 checking for dirent.h that defines DIR... no 01:53:39 checking for sys/ndir.h that defines DIR... no 01:53:39 checking for sys/dir.h that defines DIR.

[Bug inline-asm/65897] GAS(asm) "named variable" of extended asm (type ::"m" or "g") generated in wrong code style, variable stays still in ".att_syntax" -32(%ebp) not ".intel_syntax noprefix" DWORD P

2015-05-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65897 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-13 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 --- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon --- Looking at libstdc++'s config.log, I noticed that GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES is set because the default GCC link command fails on aarch64-none-elf and arm-none-eabi --with-mode=thumb because librdimon.a is not used

[Bug rtl-optimization/66048] [i386] ICE in create_pre_exit when both AVX and MPX are used

2015-05-13 Thread ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66048 --- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Wed May 13 07:49:59 2015 New Revision: 223114 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223114&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/66048 * function.c (diddle_return_valu

[Bug rtl-optimization/65862] [MIPS] IRA/LRA issue: integers spilled to floating-point registers

2015-05-13 Thread robert.suchanek at imgtec dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65862 --- Comment #12 from Robert Suchanek --- Thanks Vlad. The regression in clean on MIPS. I'll send a patch along with the testcase(s) once the core part it's committed on the trunk.

[Bug target/66112] __builtin_mul_overflow for int16_t emits poor code

2015-05-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66112 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed May 13 08:07:58 2015 New Revision: 223115 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223115&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/66112 * internal-fn.c (get_min_precision): Use U

[Bug target/66112] __builtin_mul_overflow for int16_t emits poor code

2015-05-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66112 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed May 13 08:09:01 2015 New Revision: 223116 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223116&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/66112 * config/i386/i386.md (mulv4, umulv4, *um

[Bug target/66112] __builtin_mul_overflow for int16_t emits poor code

2015-05-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66112 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/65103] [i386] GOTOFF relocation is not propagated into address expression

2015-05-13 Thread ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65103 --- Comment #2 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Wed May 13 08:29:14 2015 New Revision: 223119 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223119&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/65103 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_rtx_c

[Bug c/66090] Wrong loop code generation with -O2 on ARM

2015-05-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66090 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c/66090] Wrong loop code generation with -O2 on ARM

2015-05-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66090 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm, i?86-*-* --- Comment #5 from Richa

[Bug tree-optimization/66129] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-*c execution test

2015-05-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66129 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2015-05-13 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 --- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon --- Setting LDFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-specs=rdimon.specs works for me for aarch64-none-elf. Is it expected that we have to use such settings for the build to succeed?

[Bug tree-optimization/66010] [6 Regression] Missed optimization after inlining va_list parameter

2015-05-13 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66010 --- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Wed May 13 09:06:18 2015 New Revision: 223120 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223120&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Gimplify va_arg ap based on do_deref 2015-05-13 Tom de Vries

[Bug tree-optimization/66010] [6 Regression] Missed optimization after inlining va_list parameter

2015-05-13 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66010 --- Comment #11 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- FTR, patch submission for follow-up patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg01178.html .

[Bug tree-optimization/66129] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-*c execution test

2015-05-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66129 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Oops... Index: tree-vect-slp.c === --- tree-vect-slp.c (revision 223119) +++ tree-vect-slp.c (working copy) @@ -3459,7 +3459,7 @@ vect

[Bug fortran/66100] [6 Regression] ICE in simplify_bound

2015-05-13 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66100 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/65447] AArch64: iv-opt causes bad addressing

2015-05-13 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65447 --- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch for review at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg00641.html

[Bug tree-optimization/63602] [5/6 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O2 -ftree-loop-linear

2015-05-13 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63602 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.2 Summary|Wrong code w/

[Bug tree-optimization/66131] New: [6 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O2 -ftree-loop-linear

2015-05-13 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66131 Bug ID: 66131 Summary: [6 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O2 -ftree-loop-linear Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/66110] uint8_t memory access not optimized

2015-05-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66110 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed May 13 10:53:42 2015 New Revision: 223126 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223126&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-05-13 Richard Biener PR middle-end/66110 * ali

[Bug middle-end/66110] uint8_t memory access not optimized

2015-05-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66110 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/57271] ARM: gcc generates insufficient alignment for memory passed as extra argument for function return large composite type

2015-05-13 Thread chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57271 Maxim Ostapenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/66119] [5/6 Regression] in optimization of avx-code

2015-05-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66119 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #7) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > > DEFPARAM (PARAM_SRA_MAX_SCALARIZATION_SIZE_SPEED, > > "sra-max-scalarization-size-Ospeed", > >

[Bug tree-optimization/66123] Array of labels as values + ternary operator + pointer arithmetic = internal compiler error

2015-05-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66123 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed May 13 10:59:49 2015 New Revision: 223130 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223130&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-05-13 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/66123

[Bug tree-optimization/66123] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Array of labels as values + ternary operator + pointer arithmetic = internal compiler error

2015-05-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66123 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.3.4, 6.0 Version|unknown

[Bug c/66122] Bad uninlining decisions

2015-05-13 Thread vda.linux at googlemail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66122 --- Comment #6 from Denis Vlasenko --- Got a hold on a machine with gcc version 5.1.1 20150422 (Red Hat 5.1.1-1) Pulled current Linus kernel tree and built it with this config: http://busybox.net/~vda/kernel_config2 Note that "CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE

[Bug tree-optimization/66131] [6 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O2 -ftree-loop-linear

2015-05-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66131 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug middle-end/66127] Division by zero gets folded away

2015-05-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66127 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Note that the inconsistent handling of */% 0 has been 1:1 translated from fold-const.c (also the comments).

[Bug c/66122] Bad uninlining decisions

2015-05-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66122 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- You can look at -Winline output

[Bug c/66132] New: Undefined reference to inline function

2015-05-13 Thread shea at shealevy dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66132 Bug ID: 66132 Summary: Undefined reference to inline function Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/66132] Undefined reference to inline function

2015-05-13 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66132 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/66132] Undefined reference to inline function

2015-05-13 Thread shea at shealevy dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66132 --- Comment #2 from Shea Levy --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1) > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html I see, sorry for the noise!

[Bug middle-end/66133] New: Wrong-code with noreturn #pragma omp task body

2015-05-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66133 Bug ID: 66133 Summary: Wrong-code with noreturn #pragma omp task body Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Prio

[Bug middle-end/66127] Division by zero gets folded away

2015-05-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66127 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/30967] Extra sign/zero extend with word comparison result

2015-05-13 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30967 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/66134] New: [CHKP] ICE: Unable to coalesce ssa_names 18 and 17 which are marked as MUST COALESCE

2015-05-13 Thread ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66134 Bug ID: 66134 Summary: [CHKP] ICE: Unable to coalesce ssa_names 18 and 17 which are marked as MUST COALESCE Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug rtl-optimization/33089] combine not combining add + test in if (a + b) > 0

2015-05-13 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33089 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/66130] "invalid use of non-static member function" message could be clearer

2015-05-13 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66130 --- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Created attachment 35537 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35537&action=edit non-working patch This patch fails for: struct Local { void f(); }; Local *l; void (Local::*ptr)(); d

[Bug c++/66135] New: trailing return type generic lambda

2015-05-13 Thread barry.revzin at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66135 Bug ID: 66135 Summary: trailing return type generic lambda Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug rtl-optimization/49884] get_last_value in combine ignores register mode

2015-05-13 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49884 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug rtl-optimization/55611] Operand swapping for commutative operators

2015-05-13 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55611 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/66127] Division by zero gets folded away

2015-05-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66127 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- I think the proper solution is to mark all problematic operations with TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS so that the side-effects are preserved when omitting operands.

[Bug tree-optimization/66129] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-*c execution test

2015-05-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66129 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/66129] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-*c execution test

2015-05-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66129 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed May 13 14:38:19 2015 New Revision: 223164 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223164&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-05-13 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/66129

[Bug middle-end/66127] Division by zero gets folded away

2015-05-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66127 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Like a more complete variant of Index: gcc/tree.c === --- gcc/tree.c (revision 223151) +++ gcc/tree.c (working copy) @@ -4402,6 +4402,11 @@

[Bug middle-end/66127] Division by zero gets folded away

2015-05-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66127 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Where I get for the testcase int z = 0; int a = 1, 0; return a; for some odd reason (1?! ... fold_ignored_results fault...)

[Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split

2015-05-13 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955 --- Comment #14 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Wed May 13 15:00:50 2015 New Revision: 223165 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223165&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] Fix PR 65955: Do not take REGNO on non-REG operand

[Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split

2015-05-13 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|5.0 |5.1.0 --- Comment #15 from

[Bug c/66090] Wrong loop code generation with -O2 on ARM

2015-05-13 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66090 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I think this comes under tracking pointer provenance (DR#260) and saying that certain arithmetic on pointers derived by casts from integers has undefined behavior.

[Bug c/66066] [6 Regression] r222889 causes bogus error: initializer element is not constant

2015-05-13 Thread sje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66066 --- Comment #16 from Steve Ellcey --- I tried Marek's patch and it fixed the build issue with glibc. I did get a few new errors that I think are caused by this change: FAIL: g++.dg/warn/overflow-warn-1.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors) F

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch segfaults in operand::gen_transform (gcc/hash-table.h:223)

2015-05-13 Thread dougmencken at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 --- Comment #7 from Douglas Mencken --- $ ls -l /usr/bin/ld -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 2622416 Jul 12 2008 /usr/bin/ld $ /usr/bin/ld -v @(#)PROGRAM:ld PROJECT:ld64-85.2.1 LLVM version 3.5.0

[Bug c/66066] [6 Regression] r222889 causes bogus error: initializer element is not constant

2015-05-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66066 --- Comment #17 from Marek Polacek --- Yeah, fixing PR66127 in some way is a prerequisite for the patch to go in. PR66127 is being discussed in the ML, where I've posted an updated version of the patch for this PR.

[Bug lto/66103] [6 Regression] ICE verify_type failed with LTO and "-g -O0" via dwarf2out.c's gen_type_die_with_usage

2015-05-13 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66103 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/66110] uint8_t memory access not optimized

2015-05-13 Thread kevin at koconnor dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66110 --- Comment #8 from Kevin OConnor --- Thanks! I can confirm the latest trunk performs the desired optimization. However, this test case still isn't fully optimized: void f2(struct s1 *ps1, uint8_t *pi8) { ps1->f1 = 3; *pi8 = 8; ps1

[Bug ipa/65873] [5 Regression] Failure to inline always_inline memcpy

2015-05-13 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65873 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6 Regression] Failure to |[5 Regression] Failure to

[Bug target/66047] [5 Regression] vlc compilation failure with target attribute

2015-05-13 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66047 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6 Regression] vlc|[5 Regression] vlc |comp

[Bug c/65892] gcc fails to implement N685 aliasing of union members

2015-05-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65892 --- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor --- Thanks (again) for your comments, Joseph. I had a chance to discuss this issue with Clark Nelson last week. Clark has worked on improving the aliasing parts of the C specification in the past, for example i

[Bug c++/66130] "invalid use of non-static member function" message could be clearer

2015-05-13 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66130 --- Comment #3 from Tom Tromey --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #1) > Confirmed. A small testcase would help. Perhaps it would be even clearer if > it said something like: "non-static member function can be used only as the > ope

[Bug middle-end/66133] Wrong-code with noreturn #pragma omp task body

2015-05-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66133 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed May 13 16:59:20 2015 New Revision: 223171 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223171&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/66133 * omp-low.c (expand_omp_taskreg): For

[Bug c++/66130] "invalid use of non-static member function" message could be clearer

2015-05-13 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66130 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #4 from Manuel L

[Bug fortran/66128] ICE for some intrinsics with zero sized array parameter

2015-05-13 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/66047] [5 Regression] vlc compilation failure with target attribute

2015-05-13 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66047 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug target/66047] [5 Regression] vlc compilation failure with target attribute

2015-05-13 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66047 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Author: manu Revision: 223111 Modified property: svn:log Modified: svn:log at Wed May 13 17:42:41 2015 -- --- svn:log (origin

[Bug target/66136] New: AArch64 geniterators.sh relies on GNU sed syntax, causing build failure on FreeBSD

2015-05-13 Thread emaste at freebsd dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66136 Bug ID: 66136 Summary: AArch64 geniterators.sh relies on GNU sed syntax, causing build failure on FreeBSD Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug target/66137] New: [4.9/5 Regression] ICE with -ffixed-ebp

2015-05-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66137 Bug ID: 66137 Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] ICE with -ffixed-ebp Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/66137] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE with -ffixed-ebp

2015-05-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66137 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/66136] AArch64 geniterators.sh relies on GNU sed syntax, causing build failure on FreeBSD

2015-05-13 Thread emaste at freebsd dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66136 --- Comment #1 from Ed Maste --- It appears this comes from \n newlines in the replacement pattern - I can partially fix it by using an expression like: sed 's/(define_mode_iterator \([A-Za-z0-9_]*\) \([]\[A-Z0-9 \t]*\)/\ #define BUILTIN_\1(T

[Bug rtl-optimization/30967] Extra sign/zero extend with word comparison result

2015-05-13 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30967 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Wed May 13 19:14:07 2015 New Revision: 223174 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223174&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/30967 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (

[Bug go/66138] New: json decoder Decode function fails for some structure return values

2015-05-13 Thread boger at us dot ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66138 Bug ID: 66138 Summary: json decoder Decode function fails for some structure return values Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/30967] Extra sign/zero extend with word comparison result

2015-05-13 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30967 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66139] New: destructor not called for members of partially constructed anonymous struct/array

2015-05-13 Thread f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66139 Bug ID: 66139 Summary: destructor not called for members of partially constructed anonymous struct/array Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug c++/66092] [c++-concepts] Concept can't check variadic template arguments

2015-05-13 Thread yingpo.liao at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66092 --- Comment #1 from Ying-Po Liao --- Here's another implementation, which results in the same consequence. template struct Checker { constexpr static decltype(auto) check( std::true_type ) { return std::integral_constant(); } c

[Bug libstdc++/35968] nth_element fails to meet its complexity requirements

2015-05-13 Thread lopresti at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35968 Patrick J. LoPresti changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lopresti at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug fortran/65903] [5/6 Regression] Line continuation followed by comment character in string fails to compile

2015-05-13 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65903 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle --- Possible path here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-05/msg00071.html