[Bug c++/66026] New: C++14] throw-expression is not a valid constant-expression

Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rhalbersma at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- g++ 5.1.0 and current trunk 20150505 won't compile the following code with -std=c++1y: constexpr auto fun(int n) { switch(n) { c

[Bug target/64835] -fno-ipa-cp is inconsitently supported when attributes optimize or target are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64835 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab --- Also fails on powerpc{-m32,-m64}.

[Bug lto/66027] New: lto1: internal compiler error: in odr_types_equivalent_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66027 Bug ID: 66027 Summary: lto1: internal compiler error: in odr_types_equivalent_p Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c++/66028] New: false positive, unused loop variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66028 Bug ID: 66028 Summary: false positive, unused loop variable Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/66020] [6.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc64-abi-2.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66020 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug lto/66029] New: Build error compiling gcc5.1 using LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66029 Bug ID: 66029 Summary: Build error compiling gcc5.1 using LTO Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto

[Bug lto/66029] Build error compiling gcc5.1 using LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66029 --- Comment #1 from JD --- I compiled with used: -O3 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects and tried to link with: -flto=4 -O3 -fuse-linker-plugin

[Bug target/65916] Unnecessary floating-point instruction causes runtime exception on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65916 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/59678] [F03] Segfault on equalizing variables of a complex derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59678 --- Comment #19 from Hossein Talebi --- Hi, This patch goes to Gfortran 4.8 or the current version? Thank you. Cheers H. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:03 PM, vehre at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug lto/66029] Build error compiling gcc5.1 using LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66029 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/66029] Build error compiling gcc5.1 using LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66029 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Also what version of binutils is on the system? Can you try using latest release from FSF rather than SUSE one?

[Bug lto/66027] lto1: internal compiler error: in odr_types_equivalent_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66027 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/66030] New: [5.1.0] std::codecvt_byname missing from libstdc++ DLL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66030 Bug ID: 66030 Summary: [5.1.0] std::codecvt_byname missing from libstdc++ DLL Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug libstdc++/66030] [5.1.0] std::codecvt_byname missing from libstdc++ DLL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66030 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Sailer --- Created attachment 35471 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35471&action=edit preprocessed testcase

[Bug middle-end/66021] GCC miscompiles Z3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66021 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug debug/61352] gcc 4.9.0 fails to execute dsymutil when linking executables on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61352 --- Comment #12 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Wed May 6 00:33:49 2015 New Revision: 222835 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222835&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-05-05 Jack Howarth Backport from mainline

[Bug c/66031] New: Spurious array bounds warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66031 Bug ID: 66031 Summary: Spurious array bounds warning Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assigne

[Bug c++/54835] [C++11][DR 1518] Explicit default constructors not respected during copy-list-initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54835 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 6 02:07:34 2015 New Revision: 222836 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222836&root=gcc&view=rev Log: DR 1518 DR 1630 PR c++/54835 PR c++/60417

[Bug c++/60417] [DR 1518] Bogus error on C++03 aggregate initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60417 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 6 02:07:34 2015 New Revision: 222836 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222836&root=gcc&view=rev Log: DR 1518 DR 1630 PR c++/54835 PR c++/60417

[Bug target/66020] [6.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc64-abi-2.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66020 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgcc/66032] New: RTEMS MIPS build fails on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66032 Bug ID: 66032 Summary: RTEMS MIPS build fails on FreeBSD Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcc

[Bug libgcc/66032] RTEMS MIPS build fails on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66032 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Have you tried GNU sed rather than BSD sed?

[Bug lto/65995] LTO: ICE in add_symbol_to_partition_1 for debug build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65995 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Starke --- I was able to build r222810 without bootstrap. However, the result remains the same. I am still getting the following error when linking all together: lto1.exe: internal compiler error: in add_symbol_to_parti

[Bug ipa/66004] [6 Regression]: performance of 26_numerics/random/negative_binomial_distribution/operators/values.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66004 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libgcc/66032] RTEMS MIPS build fails on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66032 --- Comment #2 from Chris Johns --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Have you tried GNU sed rather than BSD sed? No and a good idea. I will. FYI I tend to keep the machines used for testing builds clean and minimal to minimised th

[Bug target/66033] New: rs6000 nops removed by rtl_dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66033 Bug ID: 66033 Summary: rs6000 nops removed by rtl_dce Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Ass

[Bug tree-optimization/65957] Loop with if-statement yields different results for -O3 vs -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65957 --- Comment #2 from Scott Brozell --- Ok, we shall add this to the todo list.

[Bug libgcc/66032] RTEMS MIPS build fails on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66032 --- Comment #3 from Chris Johns --- Built GNU sed from source and added to my path: ruru rtems $ sed --version GNU sed version 4.2 Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. T

[Bug fortran/62283] basic-block vectorization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 --- Comment #25 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #23) > The bb-slp-14.c testcase now FAILs on Solaris/SPARC. Attaching the dump. > > Rainer /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-14.c:19:10:

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 62283, which changed state. Bug 62283 Summary: basic-block vectorization fails https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/62283] basic-block vectorization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/62283] basic-block vectorization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 --- Comment #27 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed May 6 06:47:38 2015 New Revision: 222843 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222843&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-05-06 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/62283

[Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] severe regression in gfortran 6.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894 --- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Created attachment 35464 [details] > Follow-up patch fixing latest regression. > > With this patch all code samples and the code in the tar-archive compile > and execute well. This patch will need m

[Bug tree-optimization/48052] loop not vectorized if index is "unsigned int"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48052 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- That's an interesting idea - your argument is that if niter analysis was able to compute an expression for the number of iterations and the cast we are looking at is a widening of a BIV then it is ok to ass

<    1   2