https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65989
Bug ID: 65989
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached,
at recog.c:2256 (insn does not satisfy its
constraints) with -fsanitize=thread -mavx512dq
Produc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65990
Bug ID: 65990
Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2341 (unrecognizable
insn) with -mmemcpy-strategy=rep_8byte:-1:noalign -m32
-mtune=btver2
Product: gcc
Ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65988
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
Yes, there is (was?) a bug in ISL where they are missing extern "C" in
isl/val_gmp.h, which was hacked around in a buggy way in
graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c by including that file inside extern "C". I think
it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64835
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
Also fails on ia64.
$ grep --color hooray iinline-attr.c.062i.inline
Analyzing function: hooray/0
Analyzing function body size: hooray
Inline summary for hooray/0 inlinable
hooray/0 function not conside
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65989
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65915
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65915
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
*** Bug 65986 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65986
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65988
--- Comment #2 from Jesus Cea ---
What can I do, then?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65931
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I have already filed Bug ID# 20510039 and I am using dsymutil from Xcode 6.2.
Good, that helped quite a lot.
Thanks for the info.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53533
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-05-31 00:00:00 |2015-5-3
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53533
--- Comment #27 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 35448
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35448&action=edit
testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65991
Bug ID: 65991
Summary: maybe-unitialized - false positive
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65991
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65991
Дилян Палаузов changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65991
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65931
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> I have already filed Bug ID# 20510039 and I am using dsymutil from Xcode 6.2.
Did you also upload a standalone test case as a reproducer in that radar?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64845
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65992
Bug ID: 65992
Summary: Internal compiler error: in gimple_expand_cfg, at
cfgexpand.c:5658
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65993
Bug ID: 65993
Summary: [6 Regression] Numerous libgomp.oacc failures seen in
r222712
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64840
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58755
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Comment #5 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
> I can't see these failures on my cross builds of gcc-5, though.
> It could be a problem of the build compiler too.
I am manually building the latest gcc-4.9.2 snapshot we have in Debian now and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65994
Bug ID: 65994
Summary: auto deduces object instead of initializer_list
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65982
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65931
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Did you also upload a standalone test case as a reproducer in that radar?
I did provide what I was asked for. Since then I don't have any news.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
--- Comment #27 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun May 3 18:09:57 2015
New Revision: 222751
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222751&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-05-03 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/37131
* gfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65995
Bug ID: 65995
Summary: LTO: ICE in add_symbol_to_partition_1 for debug build
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65992
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65996
Bug ID: 65996
Summary: [5.1 Regression] gfortran ICE with -dH
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65994
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(Hi Barry!)
Generally when we fix defects we apply them retroactively to older standards
modes as well, if the old behaviour is defective then it's better to change it
than maintain two code paths just for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65994
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> ... just for the same of nitpicky conformance.
s/same/sake/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47123
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47123
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47093
Bug 47093 depends on bug 47123, which changed state.
Bug 47123 Summary: *freebsd configurations configure, but don't build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47123
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61303
--- Comment #7 from Maciej Bliziński ---
Checked again, the problem is still there in GCC-5.1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #34 from Frédéric Buclin ---
My debug code caught the problem. In one of the last bugmails, I got:
Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 14:56:33 +
X-Bugzilla-Debug-Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 14:56:33 +
X-Bugzilla-Debug-DeltaTS: 2015-05-03 20:2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48890
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48890
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.6.1 |6.0
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65997
Bug ID: 65997
Summary: -mregparm=3 causes bad DWARF debug info
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65997
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65997
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
This could be a readelf bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65998
Bug ID: 65998
Summary: please support multiarch for the user search paths
(CPATH, etc.)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65997
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65999
Bug ID: 65999
Summary: c11 compliance - fopen_s not supported
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66000
Bug ID: 66000
Summary: Suggestion: more than one "not declared in this scope"
per line
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66001
Bug ID: 66001
Summary: [5.1/6 regression] ICE when NSDMI in a literal class
uses a destructor
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65999
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65999
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> These should be provided by your libc if at all.
This means report it to glibc if you use GNU/Linux. Apple if you use Mac OS X,
etc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65871
--- Comment #7 from James Almer ---
Thanks for the above fix.
I forgot to test BMI1's andn. That one should have an insn modeled this way as
well.
int foo (unsigned int x, unsigned int y)
{
if (~x & y)
return 1;
return 0;
}
gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66001
--- Comment #1 from David Krauss ---
If a non-constexpr constructor is addend to struct dt, the behavior is
different, and inconsistent between a bound temporary and an initializer_list
sequence.
#include
struct dt
{ dt() {} ~ dt() {} };
51 matches
Mail list logo
