[Bug go/65616] New: libgobegin.a not compiled with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65616 Bug ID: 65616 Summary: libgobegin.a not compiled with -fPIC Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug ipa/65478] [5 regression] crafty performance regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenther at suse dot de --- Comment #13 f

[Bug c++/65617] New: new valgrind error in update_costs_from_copies

rror in update_costs_from_copies. $ diff 20150323.out 20150329.out > ==13155== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) > ==13155==at 0xBDF10D: update_costs_from_copies(ira_allocno*, bool, bool) [ clone .constprop.58] (ira-color.c:1445) > ==13155==by 0xBE12B9: assign_hard_reg(ir

[Bug ipa/65076] [5 Regression] 16% tramp3d-v4.cpp compile time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076 --- Comment #28 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Yes, it is still 15% on my machine, too: markus@x4 ~ % time g++ -w -Ofast tramp3d-v4.cpp g++ -w -Ofast tramp3d-v4.cpp 25.45s user 0.33s system 99% cpu 25.832 total (At least this is still faster tha

[Bug libfortran/65563] Segfault on reopening fort.xxx file with explicit name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65563 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- I upgraded to recent trunk (which I hadn't done for some time) and found that I can no longer reproduce the error with 5.0. So I'll make this into a test case and commit this as obvious, to make sure no regr

[Bug tree-optimization/61114] Scalar evolution hides a big-endian const-folding bug.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug testsuite/64983] Incomplete summary when regtesting with dejagnu 1.5.2.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64983 --- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth --- Note that this issue seems to only be fixable from within dejagnu and that the commit of 6d2e2d3791bcea70131a6cf64a0a522a7b8e effectively broke the log_summary proc in dejagnu's lib/framework.exp by reseti

[Bug testsuite/64983] Incomplete summary when regtesting with dejagnu 1.5.2.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64983 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I confirm that the dejagnu 1.5.2-3 packaging in fink restores the correct results. Thanks for the debugging.

[Bug target/65564] [5 Regression] builtin-bnd-narrow-ptr-bounds-2-nov.c:15:1: internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5745

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65564 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Mar 29 14:20:29 2015 New Revision: 221761 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221761&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-03-29 Thomas Koenig PR libgfortran/65564 * gfortran.dg/

[Bug libfortran/65563] Segfault on reopening fort.xxx file with explicit name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65563 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/65563] Segfault on reopening fort.xxx file with explicit name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65563 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Mar 29 14:33:09 2015 New Revision: 221762 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221762&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-03-29 Thomas Koenig PR libgfortran/65563 Refer to corre

[Bug target/65564] [5 Regression] builtin-bnd-narrow-ptr-bounds-2-nov.c:15:1: internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5745

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65564 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug ada/65618] New: [5 Regression] gnat bootstrap comparison failure on mips{,el}-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65618 Bug ID: 65618 Summary: [5 Regression] gnat bootstrap comparison failure on mips{,el}-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/65478] [5 regression] crafty performance regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478 --- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Sun Mar 29 15:38:52 2015 New Revision: 221763 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221763&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/65478 * params.def (PARAM_IPA_CP_RECURSION_PENALTY) : New

[Bug ipa/65588] [5 Regression] lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65588 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Sun Mar 29 15:41:55 2015 New Revision: 221764 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221764&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/65588 * gcc.target/i386/pr65588.c: New testcase. Added:

[Bug target/65456] powerpc64le autovectorized copy loop missed optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456 --- Comment #15 from Bill Schmidt --- That last bit also needs an update to the table in ISA 2.07 II.2, p. 754. I'm planning to include the change for the vector alignment piece in my P8 unaligned vectors patch, since it seems relevant there. I

[Bug target/63683] m32c-rtems ICE unable to find spill register compiling libgcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63683 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- C

[Bug c++/65509] [5 Regression] [C++11] GCC rejects operator== with two distinct pointers as not constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65509 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/65456] powerpc64le autovectorized copy loop missed optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456 --- Comment #16 from Bill Schmidt --- Proposed patch added to the general P8 unaligned vector patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-03/msg01502.html

[Bug c++/65398] [5 Regression] [C++11] GCC rejects constexpr variable definitions with valid initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65398 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug c++/65619] New: friend declaration with template template parameter not recognized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619 Bug ID: 65619 Summary: friend declaration with template template parameter not recognized Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/61635] LTO partitioner does not handle &&label in statics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61635 --- Comment #7 from Andi Kleen --- Still happens with current trunk and with newer LTO Linux kernels (4.0-rc*)

[Bug bootstrap/60946] Current 4.9 branch does not boot strap on FC20 with systemtap-devel installed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60946 --- Comment #8 from Andi Kleen --- I still get that one with current trunk on my fedora 21 system.

[Bug target/65612] g++.dg/ext/mvXX.C don't work with -fPIE -pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65612 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- I don't think the compiler is at fault here. Tracing the executable, I got: Breakpoint 1, 0x4780 in __cpu_indicator_init@plt () (gdb) disass Dump of assembler code for function __cpu_indicator_ini

[Bug fortran/59016] f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59016 drikosev at otenet dot gr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drikosev at otenet dot gr ---

[Bug fortran/59016] f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59016 --- Comment #7 from drikosev at otenet dot gr --- Hi, The reduced test case which has been posted by janus (comment 1) crashes also 4.8.4 and gcc 5.0 (the latter was copied from trunc a few days ago). The backtrace I get agrees with that of Domi

[Bug c/65620] New: Incorrect warning for !! with -Wlogical-not-parentheses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65620 Bug ID: 65620 Summary: Incorrect warning for !! with -Wlogical-not-parentheses Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug target/65612] g++.dg/ext/mvXX.C don't work with -fPIE -pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65612 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/65612] g++.dg/ext/mvXX.C don't work with -fPIE -pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65612 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 35173 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35173&action=edit A patch to move __cpu_indicator_init This patch is incomplete. We need to handle backward compatibility as well as v

[Bug rtl-optimization/64164] [4.9/5 Regression] one more stack slot used due to one less inlining level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164 --- Comment #26 from Alexandre Oliva --- Patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-03/msg01491.html

[Bug target/65351] [5 Regression] ld: absolute addressing (perhaps -mdynamic-no-pic) used in _byte_common_op_match_null_string_p from ../libiberty/pic/libiberty.a(regex.o) not allowed ... on powerpc-a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65351 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- Created attachment 35174 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35174&action=edit Patch addressing review comments Will be posting this to @patches after some more checking.

[Bug fortran/59016] f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59016 --- Comment #8 from drikosev at otenet dot gr --- When gfortran reports the error, it expects that the name 'atomic_kind_type' is likely a procedure or function; but the syntax of the access-stmt is: access-stmt ::= access-spec [ [ :: ] access-i

[Bug libffi/65567] ERROR: tcl error sourcing /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libffi/testsuite/libffi.complex/complex.exp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65567 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sun Mar 29 20:46:17 2015 New Revision: 221765 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221765&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libffi/65567 * testsuite/lib/libffi.exp (libffi_feature_t

[Bug target/65612] g++.dg/ext/mvXX.C don't work with -fPIE -pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65612 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #35173|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libffi/65567] ERROR: tcl error sourcing /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libffi/testsuite/libffi.complex/complex.exp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65567 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- Fixed.

[Bug libstdc++/65500] [5 Regression] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++2014/all_attributes.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65500 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/65621] New: boot strap with checking enabled ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65621 Bug ID: 65621 Summary: boot strap with checking enabled ICEs Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug bootstrap/65621] boot strap with checking enabled ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65621 Andi Kleen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/65478] [5 regression] crafty performance regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478 --- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka --- The inline bump needed is about 23. Richard, i guess convincing early optimizers to turn that hack into shifts (that is done by GCC but only at RTL time), is out of reach for this release, right?

[Bug target/65507] avr-gcc -fmerge-all-constants causes internal compiler error in get_section, at varasm.c:312

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65507 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/57597] ICE: in get_section, at varasm.c:312: Segmentation fault with -fmerge-all-constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57597 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dfnsonfsduifb at gmx dot de --- Comme

[Bug c++/65622] New: No known conversion to initializer_list with default argument in constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65622 Bug ID: 65622 Summary: No known conversion to initializer_list with default argument in constructor Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug ipa/65076] [5 Regression] 16% tramp3d-v4.cpp compile time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076 --- Comment #29 from Jan Hubicka --- I also tested with -Os and compile times seems about same as for 4.9 modulo noise. The following one liner brings instruction and function count in final binary to same as in 4.9: Index: ipa-inline.c

[Bug ipa/65076] [5 Regression] 16% tramp3d-v4.cpp compile time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076 --- Comment #30 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Mon Mar 30 02:00:56 2015 New Revision: 221769 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221769&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/65076 * ipa-inline.c (edge_badness): Base denominator on

[Bug target/65612] Multiversioning doesn't work with DSO nor PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65612 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.5 Summary|g++.dg/ext/mvXX.C don

[Bug target/65612] Multiversioning doesn't work with DSO nor PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65612 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 35176 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35176&action=edit A testcase with DSO [hjl@gnu-tools-1 pr65612]$ make g++ -O2-c -o main.o main.cc g++ -shared -fPIC -O2 -o libmv20

[Bug lto/61635] LTO partitioner does not handle &&label in statics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61635 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- I

[Bug lto/61635] LTO partitioner does not handle &&label in statics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61635 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka --- This is patch I am testing

[Bug lto/64860] [5 Regression] multiple definition of typeinfo in 5.0 (4.9.2 works)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64860 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka --- I filled in binutils PR for extension of plugin API https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18178

[Bug c++/65623] New: Incorrect location of error messages on calling copy constructor of unique_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65623 Bug ID: 65623 Summary: Incorrect location of error messages on calling copy constructor of unique_ptr Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug target/65624] New: ICE in aarch64-builtins.c when expanding 4-argument aarch64 intrinsic.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65624 Bug ID: 65624 Summary: ICE in aarch64-builtins.c when expanding 4-argument aarch64 intrinsic. Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/65624] ICE in aarch64-builtins.c when expanding 4-argument aarch64 intrinsic.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65624 --- Comment #1 from Maxim Ostapenko --- Created attachment 35179 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35179&action=edit Trivial fix Trivial fix.