https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
> > This suggests that cloning of function Search and not inlining
> > NextMove is only part of the story.
> >
>
> I'm attaching output of my script that compares inlining decisions.
> "File 1" is wpa inlinin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65537
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65457
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka ---
The chkp stuff is IMO bit problematic. I was thinking about cutting the
optimization queue but was always hesitant to do so because of the cache
locality and other implications. I am not sure if that was consi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076
--- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka ---
> > Even though the inline decisions does not seem to be changed considerably
> > (at least on tramp3d).
>
> Yeah, clobbers don't account for anything for size/inline estimates
> (well, I hope so!).
Yep, the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61051
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65498
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65471
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65452
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076
--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076
>
> --- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka ---
> > > Even though the inline decisions does not s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65452
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65509
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
Summary|[C++11] GCC rejec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65519
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65519
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 25 08:46:20 2015
New Revision: 221654
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221654&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-25 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/65519
* genmatch.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65509
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63256
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ma...@linux-mips.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62028
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65536
--- Comment #28 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #26)
> Created attachment 35130 [details]
> linemap
>
> this is a proof of concept patch that makes streamer in to collect locations
> into a "cache" and apply them in s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65536
--- Comment #30 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 35132
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35132&action=edit
Chrome: ODR warnings with patch from #c21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65536
--- Comment #29 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 35131
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35131&action=edit
Chrome: ODR warnings before
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
> Or, as discussed on IRC we can consider MEM_REFs where first operand isn't
> just
> SSA_NAME or ADDR_EXPR of a decl, but allow also ADDR_EXPR of
> handled_comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65536
--- Comment #31 from Martin Liška ---
Beginning of the difference of ODR warnings:
210,211c210,211
< gen/blink/core/CSSPropertyNames.cpp:2330:0: warning: type ‘struct
stringpool_t’ violates one definition rule [-Wodr]
< static const short looku
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63230
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64787
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65509
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65536
--- Comment #32 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #16)
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65536
> >
> > --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
> > The main issue with LTO is that it re-creates a combine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65543
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Mar 25 09:57:06 2015
New Revision: 221655
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221655&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-25 Paolo Carlini
PR libstdc++/65543
* inclu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65515
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 25 09:58:18 2015
New Revision: 221656
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221656&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/65515
* lto-streamer-out.c (DFS::worklist): New struct.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65515
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65536
--- Comment #33 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #26)
> Created attachment 35130 [details]
> linemap
>
> this is a proof of concept patch that makes streamer in to collect locations
> into a "cache" and apply them in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65544
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Can you verify if the cross compiler uses a linker-plugin by specifying
-fuse-linker-plugin? Without that errors like this are unfortunately expected.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65546
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Peeling is certainly not profitable as with just 32 char elements in tmp.b
and then just iterating over the first 16 there will be no vectorized
iteration left if we peel at least one iteration (assuming v16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65532
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Morin ---
Author: mikael
Date: Wed Mar 25 10:15:46 2015
New Revision: 221657
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221657&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix regression introduced at revision 221586.
PR fortran/64952
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64952
--- Comment #11 from Mikael Morin ---
Author: mikael
Date: Wed Mar 25 10:15:46 2015
New Revision: 221657
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221657&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix regression introduced at revision 221586.
PR fortran/64952
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62164
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65509
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
const int i1 = 1;
const int i2 = 2;
constexpr auto b = &i1 == &i2;
int main() {}
is now also rejected, when it used to be accepted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65547
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65549
Bug ID: 65549
Summary: crash in htab_hash_string with -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65549
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61670
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65547
--- Comment #3 from Edward Diener ---
Where do you get the idea that the standard doesn't require an error, it
requires a diagnostic message ?
It clearly is a violation of the C++11 standard according to the section and
paragraph I cited in my b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65509
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Krügler ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> const int i1 = 1;
> const int i2 = 2;
> constexpr auto b = &i1 == &i2;
> int main() {}
>
> is now also rejected, when it used to be accepted.
Both behavioral c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65549
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65538
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 25 11:47:04 2015
New Revision: 221658
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221658&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR65538.
PR tree-optimization/65538
* symbol-summary.h (funct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65538
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65547
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Edward Diener from comment #3)
> Where do you get the idea that the standard doesn't require an error, it
> requires a diagnostic message ?
1.4 [intro.compliance], the text I quoted. Where do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65547
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And as has been documented forever, the way to get diagnostics for GNU
extensions that contradict the ISO standard is the -pedantic switch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.2/gcc/Warning-Options.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65508
--- Comment #1 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed Mar 25 12:41:27 2015
New Revision: 221661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221661&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/65508
* tree-chkp.c (chkp_add_bo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65508
ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62630
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||xfail
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62630
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 25 12:54:12 2015
New Revision: 221662
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221662&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-25 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/62630
* gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65543
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Mar 25 12:55:04 2015
New Revision: 221663
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221663&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-25 Paolo Carlini
PR libstdc++/65543
* inclu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64972
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65543
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Mar 25 12:55:22 2015
New Revision: 221664
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221664&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-25 Paolo Carlini
PR libstdc++/65543
* inclu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65536
--- Comment #34 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #30)
> Created attachment 35132 [details]
> Chrome: ODR warnings with patch from #c21
@Martin:
The previous comment where the ICE is mentioned seems to refer to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
I've meanwhile disabled pass_chkp_instrumentation_passes by default.
The fixup_cfg in pass_build_ssa_passes doesn't do anything on tramp3d
(and bootstrap/testing shows no issue removing it either).
Adding
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65506
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65541
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> This fixes it: ...
Confimed (the patch in comment 4 does not apply cleanly and needs some minor
surgery) and it regtest without regression.
Thanks for quick fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65154
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.5
Summary|ICE with {} ini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65342
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Results with the patch in comment 11 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-03/msg02484.html
Note that the patch in comment 6 also fixes this PR. It is probably the best
short term solution.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65415
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65543
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 35133
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35133&action=edit
gcc5-pr64715.patch
Untested temporary hack for GCC 5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65509
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> The difference between when i1 and i2 are constexprs and when they are not
> is that their cgraph nodes have definition = false if they are constexprs.
> Dunno if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65154
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65550
Bug ID: 65550
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) with pch
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: pch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65509
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
The following (untested) should work:
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c
@@ -6113,6 +6113,7 @@ make_rtl_for_nonlocal_decl (tree decl, tree init, const
char* asmspec)
not emitted into the object fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65551
Bug ID: 65551
Summary: [5 Regression] FAIL: 26_numerics/complex/50880.cc
execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65509
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #8)
> The following (untested) should work:
>
> --- a/gcc/cp/decl.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c
> @@ -6113,6 +6113,7 @@ make_rtl_for_nonlocal_decl (tree decl, tree init,
> c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65509
--- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> But in the #c5 testcase it isn't DECL_DECLARED_CONSTEXPR_P, is it?
True :(.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65154
--- Comment #5 from Mikhail Maltsev ---
I have posted a patch for this bug:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-03/msg00026.html
But it reveals some latent bug (PR65503). In the following case (after applying
the patch):
struct ss {
ss()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64972
--- Comment #17 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Mar 25 15:05:02 2015
New Revision: 221665
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221665&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libgomp/64972
* oacc-parallel.c (GOACC_parallel): Use PRIu64 if a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64972
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65550
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63385
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65552
Bug ID: 65552
Summary: [c++-concepts] Constraint checking regression for
concepts with multiple type requirements
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65531
--- Comment #3 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
When instrumentation clone is created for a node with a comdat group, it gets
the same comdat group and is linked with the original node via
same_comdat_group. Do I need to change this behavior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61717
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61639
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65553
Bug ID: 65553
Summary: ICE on valid variadic template
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65510
--- Comment #3 from Chen Gang ---
(In reply to Chen Gang from comment #2)
> For test.i:
>
> int oxu_driver_init(void)
> {
> *(volatile unsigned int *)(-1) = *(unsigned int *)(-1);
> }
>
> If test.i use a valid number (>= 0x10) or normal variab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33394
--- Comment #4 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: alalaw01
Date: Wed Mar 25 15:46:58 2015
New Revision: 221666
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221666&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/33394
* testsuite/21_strings/basic_st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65553
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65554
Bug ID: 65554
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65553
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
Bug ID: 6
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (LHS in
noreturn call)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65537
--- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Mar 25 16:01:36 2015
New Revision: 221667
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221667&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
config/ChangeLog:
PR bootstrap/65537
* bootstrap-lto-nopl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57588
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65556
Bug ID: 65556
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (type
precision mismatch in switch statement)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30277
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65557
Bug ID: 65557
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in hash_table<>::find_slot_with_hash()
with -fdevirtualize -fipa-cp -fipa-icf-functions
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50462
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65551
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65558
Bug ID: 65558
Summary: crash using __attribute__((__abi_tag__)) on anonymous
inline namespace
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52099
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
