https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
Bug ID: 65521
Summary: [5 Regression] nondeterministic -fcompare-debug
failures
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 35102
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35102&action=edit
unreduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64952
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin ---
Author: mikael
Date: Mon Mar 23 07:53:31 2015
New Revision: 221586
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221586&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-23 Paul Thomas
Mikael Morin
PR fortran/64952
for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65443
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35092|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65238
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 23 08:02:39 2015
New Revision: 221587
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221587&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR preprocessor/65238
* internal.h (_cpp_scan_out_logical_line):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65238
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 35104
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35104&action=edit
testcase for x86_64
Also happens on x86_64:
% gcc -c -fcompare-debug -std=gnu89 -O2 hooks.i
gcc: error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64952
--- Comment #6 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Dear Mikael,
The pureness is also confused by the C pure, which is whiter than
white pure. I agree with your last remark about the standards
committee needing to reflect on this.
Than
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65513
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
struct socket {
int sk;
};
selinux_task_getioprio(struct task_struct *p) {
return current_has_perm(p, 256UL);
}
selinux_task_getscheduler(struct task_struct *p) {
return current_has_perm(p, 256UL)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
I resent change causes ada no longer to bootstrap
multiple definition of ada_demangle
/usr/local/src/gcc4.3/src/libiberty/cplus-dem.c:895: multiple definition
of `ada_demangle'
ada/adadecode.o:/usr/local/src/gcc4.3/src/gcc/ada/adadecode.c:374: first
defined here
graham
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65518
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65517
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65515
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
--- Comment #57 from Kai Tietz ---
(In reply to doug mcilroy from comment #56)
> (In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #55)
> Comment #55 overlooks the Standard's translation phase 1, which replaces an
> implementation-defined end-of-line indicator
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65513
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65506
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65505
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65502
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 35105
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35105&action=edit
gcc5-pr65521.patch
This fixes this for me. But I haven't done any in-depth analysis whether the
symtab order f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63587
--- Comment #16 from Yvan Roux ---
Author: yroux
Date: Mon Mar 23 09:50:33 2015
New Revision: 221589
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221589&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2015-03-23 Yvan Roux
Backport from trunk r216841.
2014-10-29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65520
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
--- Comment #23 from Yvan Roux ---
Author: yroux
Date: Mon Mar 23 09:55:34 2015
New Revision: 221590
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221590&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-23 Yvan Roux
Backport from trunk r220616.
2015-02-11 Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65473
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Louis Dionne from comment #0)
> One would expect that including _any_ header from the standard library
> defines the relevant detection macros.
That's not true for most of the headers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, judging from the fact that we print symtab_node::order into the
-fdump-final-insns= dumps:
;; Function selinux_ops (selinux_ops, funcdef_no=4, cgraph_uid=4,
symbol_order=4)
it should be ok (otherwise
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65168
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65508
ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35105|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65494
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65516
--- Comment #8 from David Kredba ---
Svn revision 221590 fails bootstrap in gnat1 so I cannot test your patch.
../libiberty/libiberty.a(cplus-dem.o): In function `ada_demangle':
cplus-dem.c:(.text+0xdb8): multiple definition of `ada_demangle'
a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65522
Bug ID: 65522
Summary: Svn revision 221590 fails bootstrap -
../libiberty/libiberty.a(cplus-dem.o): In function
`ada_demangle': cplus-dem.c:(.text+0xdb8): multiple
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65498
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65519
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65519
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|ebotcazou at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65499
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65523
Bug ID: 65523
Summary: ICE: in gimple_op, at gimple.h:2270 with
-fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64570
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
Seems ok with trunk dated 20150322.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64570
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #4)
> Seems ok with trunk dated 20150322.
No, it still fails. You're probably using an --enable-checking=release
compiler...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65519
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
This boils down to:
with Ada.Strings.Unbounded; use Ada.Strings.Unbounded;
with Interfaces;use Interfaces;
package P is
type Arr is array (Unsigned_32 range <>) of Unbounded_String;
end P;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64952
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #6)
> Thanks for finishing the job.
I have yet to fix 4.9 as well, as you suggested. In a week or so.
> Will you post a message on the clf
> thread, or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65523
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65522
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60255
--- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Mon Mar 23 11:58:49 2015
New Revision: 221591
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221591&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
2015-03-23 Andre Vehreschild
J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64570
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #5)
> No, it still fails. You're probably using an --enable-checking=release
> compiler...
Indeed I am, sorry for the false alarm.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65473
--- Comment #2 from Louis Dionne ---
Does the standard specify which headers should define those macros? If not,
then it's a QOI issue that could easily be solved. In all cases, does stdcxx
document which headers must be included in order to get
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 35108
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35108&action=edit
gcc5-pr65504.patch
Patch I'm going to bootstrap/regtest now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65494
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 23 12:47:54 2015
New Revision: 221592
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221592&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-23 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/65494
* tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65522
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21334
--- Comment #51 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is no longer an issue when using the new non-reference-counted std::string
implementation in GCC 5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16612
Bug 16612 depends on bug 24882, which changed state.
Bug 24882 Summary: [meta-bug] Non-refcounted, moveable basic_string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21334
Bug 21334 depends on bug 24882, which changed state.
Bug 24882 Summary: [meta-bug] Non-refcounted, moveable basic_string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19495
Bug 19495 depends on bug 24882, which changed state.
Bug 24882 Summary: [meta-bug] Non-refcounted, moveable basic_string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24196
Bug 24196 depends on bug 24882, which changed state.
Bug 24882 Summary: [meta-bug] Non-refcounted, moveable basic_string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57221
--- Comment #9 from Maxim Kuvyrkov ---
Hi Bero,
I'm working on reproducing this. How do you build the android toolchain? Is
it manual or do you have this scripted?
In particular, do you use a pre-generated sysroot with Bionic or do you build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65522
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65522
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456
--- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #10)
> I believe that the choice to scalarize is based on the vector cost model.
Hm, that would be interesting. The applied patch changes the cost model to
favor the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65522
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Ah, except ada_demangle is also exported from libgnat*.so - wonder why the
> RTS is built with IN_GCC.
This is explained in gcc-interface/Makefile.in.
> In that case, guess the Ada folks need to decide wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|ebotcazou at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64931
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #56 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: clyon
Date: Mon Mar 23 13:43:22 2015
New Revision: 221593
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221593&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-23 Christophe Lyon
PR sanitizer/59009
* san
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #57 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Cherry-picked r230324 and committed in GCC as r221593, to fix aarch64 problems.
I'm not sure whether the "old arm" and hppa problems have been fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65523
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65494
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65500
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #1)
> At one time, GCC was permissive about system header issues, particularly
> when they aren't
> really a problem. Is this still the case?
It is, yes, but this spe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65506
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 35111
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35111&action=edit
gcc5-pr65506.patch
Indeed, have verified this with the cross-compiler and the attached patch
should cure this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65519
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
It's forwprop4 propagating an abnormal SSA name:
:
[...]
I.3_30(ab) = I.3_1 + 1;
_31 = (interfaces__unsigned_32) I.3_30(ab);
[...]
:
_43 = v.P_ARRAY;
_45 = (sizetype) _31;
is changed into:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65047
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21494
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65047
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65524
Bug ID: 65524
Summary: gnatbind generates decrementing the unexisting
elab-counter into finalize_library
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59256
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #3 from Jo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65524
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65522
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35109|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59254
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65500
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-03-23 10:02 AM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> 3) Use fixincludes to change either the definition of __LWP_RWLOCK_VALID to
> (short)0x8c91 or change the definition of PTHREAD_RWLOCK_INI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65506
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|rguenth at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65506
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-03-23 10:05 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Indeed, have verified this with the cross-compiler and the attached patch
> should cure this.
I have applied the patch for testing but hi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65518
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 23 14:59:57 2015
New Revision: 221595
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221595&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-23 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/65518
* tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65518
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.0
Known to fail|5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 23 15:17:20 2015
New Revision: 221596
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221596&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65521
* ipa-icf.c (sem_item::update_hash_by_addr_refs): Ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 23 15:31:59 2015
New Revision: 221597
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221597&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/65504
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_copy_addr_to_reg): Set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65518
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] select |[4.9 Regression] select
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62051
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65496
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Richard, any thoughts what to do about this? Avoid scheduling frame related
> instructions across conditional jumps? Something else?
Yes, for the short ter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60851
--- Comment #14 from Richard Henderson ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #13)
> In 4.9 branch, the check is located in three different places throughout
> constrain_operands. There was a big cleanup by Richard Sandiford in this
> area [1]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64967
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Or drop the gnu-versioned-namespace support altogether.
I'd like to do that ... maybe for GCC 6 though. It seems a bit late now to
remove it without deprecatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64967
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Looks reasonable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65522
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 23 15:49:02 2015
New Revision: 221599
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221599&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/65522
* ipa-devirt.c: Remove duplicate demangle.h inc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65522
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65519
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
The problematic statement is created by the gimple-match stuff:
Applying pattern match.pd:761, gimple-match.c:1727
Applying pattern match.pd:625, gimple-match.c:1525
gimple_simplified to _71 = I.3_30(ab) & 4
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
